Hi Guys. Hopefully you'll be able to point me in the right direction. Apologies if this is in the wrong section.
This time last year, I was asked to take some photographs of a theatre production in London for their 'press coverage'. Only a small affair on a small budget so was doing a friend and his wife a favour. As it turns out, the charity that part-funded the theatre production commissioned another photographer to come along to the dress rehearsal. I had no issue with that. It turns out that this photographer was a very big name (so I've since discovered looking on the web and does a huge amount of work for the BBC). There was me with my D750 and there was he with his two D5s with a 24-70 and 70-200 all ready to go. I sort of looked like the poor relation.
So took the photos that was requested alongside this big, spent a whole lot of time processing them afterwards in a very short amount of time and sent them over to my friends within 48hrs. I wasn't being paid but saw it as getting some much needed exposure and was under the impression these were going to be used in the press.
However, when the theatre reviews started appearing in the press a week later after the full press performance (including the Evening Standard, the Metro and the Sun), every single article had a photograph taken by the other guy. Ok, he's a top photographer, got no issue with that. But I'm keen to know how the press got hold of his photographs?
Do they get uploaded to a press website and they help themselves for a fee?
Do they get handed over to the theatre and they circulate the images?
Is this stock photography?
What is the normal process and procedure?
I'm asking now as the friend has just approached me to photograph his next production which would mean taking two days off work for no pay again but I'd like to try and get some exposure the effort deserves this time and hopefully see at least one of my photos in the press.
He's told me I'm the only photographer coming this time but I guess there's always the possibility that a journalist reviewer will always bring a photographer with them too... at least I'm going armed with twin D750s this time lol.
Any help/advice greatly received. Thanks.
This time last year, I was asked to take some photographs of a theatre production in London for their 'press coverage'. Only a small affair on a small budget so was doing a friend and his wife a favour. As it turns out, the charity that part-funded the theatre production commissioned another photographer to come along to the dress rehearsal. I had no issue with that. It turns out that this photographer was a very big name (so I've since discovered looking on the web and does a huge amount of work for the BBC). There was me with my D750 and there was he with his two D5s with a 24-70 and 70-200 all ready to go. I sort of looked like the poor relation.
So took the photos that was requested alongside this big, spent a whole lot of time processing them afterwards in a very short amount of time and sent them over to my friends within 48hrs. I wasn't being paid but saw it as getting some much needed exposure and was under the impression these were going to be used in the press.
However, when the theatre reviews started appearing in the press a week later after the full press performance (including the Evening Standard, the Metro and the Sun), every single article had a photograph taken by the other guy. Ok, he's a top photographer, got no issue with that. But I'm keen to know how the press got hold of his photographs?
Do they get uploaded to a press website and they help themselves for a fee?
Do they get handed over to the theatre and they circulate the images?
Is this stock photography?
What is the normal process and procedure?
I'm asking now as the friend has just approached me to photograph his next production which would mean taking two days off work for no pay again but I'd like to try and get some exposure the effort deserves this time and hopefully see at least one of my photos in the press.
He's told me I'm the only photographer coming this time but I guess there's always the possibility that a journalist reviewer will always bring a photographer with them too... at least I'm going armed with twin D750s this time lol.
Any help/advice greatly received. Thanks.
Last edited: