it is true that China has a certain hive like quality where the individual is expected to conform for the welfare of all.
But it is a system that both works and is adaptable.
Today it is a hybrid system, a joint state controlled private enterprise venture, and like most hybrids it is doing remarkably well. it has a growth and success rate that most countries would die for.
Somewhat like Russia, it has taken to the individual capitalist business model like duck to water. however though its leading business men are incredibly rich, and corruption is rife. The State seems to curb their excesses with ruthless determination, with those caught out, severely punished usually at the cost of their lives. ultimately everything is dominated by the command structure of the state.
For instance the ownership of Huawei has preoccupied Political minds for some time. The official answer is..
" Huawei is owned by our employees through an Employee Stock Ownership Program (ESOP) that has been in place since the beginning. No one can own a share without working at Huawei, and as of 2018 there were 96,768 shareholding employees. Our founder, Ren Zhengfei, owns a 1.14% stake in the company. "
As the employees stock ownership plan is administered by their official trade union. and all such trade unions are, state controlled. it is thought, by many in the west, that the Chinese state must equally control Huawei. While that might be true in the sense of ultimate ownership control, as in how a main board share ownership might outweigh all other factors . There seems to be no evidence that the Chinese state micromanages Huawei at all. Were there such evidence. I am sure it would have come to light by now. The suggestion seems to be entirely speculation based on no more than "what Iffs"
I would suggest that every Chinese company operates with the consent and within the control structure of the Chinese state.
In practical terms this is little different to the controls used by government in the west to control and regulate their own companies.
Neither system should give any particular concern to the other.
In East or west, should their government "requests" a company, organisation or individual, to do something for the benefit/ security of the country, they would find it very difficult not to comply. The general population, in both cases, would most likely, remain in total ignorance of it.
Largely freedom in the west is an illusion, none of us can do more than our particular legal and political systems allow. We are, perhaps, even more controlled by our financial positions, and the reality of our obligations to maintain the lives of both ourselves and our families.
If we do not comply with the laws and regulation of the land, or our contracts of employment and whims of our employers, then our remaining freedoms are nullified, and life become difficult to impossible.
In China these things are codified to a far greater extent, and they are seen in the west as a violation of human rights.
A person who ends up on the waste heap of humanity would find it impossible to distinguish any benefit in either system.