- Messages
- 5,064
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
This is especially true if you add a battery grip too, the main problem with such as the D4 is that you can't make it bigger and hence more professional
Dave
The new Nikon D500 DX for wedding photography ?
- Thread starter tesco
- Start date
This is especially true if you add a battery grip too, the main problem with such as the D4 is that you can't make it bigger and hence more professional
Dave
Of course I forgot the grip
It needs to be at least 25-30mp just in case the bride needs a set of billboards instead of a 14in album
jason nelson
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1
- Name
- jason
- Edit My Images
- No
I am considering changing systems though and it'll either be to the Fuji XPro2 or the D750 - neither is fully 'Pro' spec cos Wedding togs just don't need cameras like the D4 - that's a waste of money
..................
SUMMARY
Just in case you couldn't be arsed to read all of the above...
ANY modern mirrorless, FX, DX, camera is good enough for Weddings
Dave
Hi Dave. I know this thread is pretty old but I am curious, did you get around to trying out the Fuji system? I'm considering trying one out as well. I have a D500 and really like it, but I find I don't want to carry it with me unless I have something special planned. I really like the size factor of the fuji.
The Fuji x system is great for weddings
Especially if you get the newer bodies with the better focus module
- Messages
- 5,064
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I got close lol
I tried using a pal's XPRO2 for a bit and while it was impressive it actually didn't seem that much smaller that size/weight was really any better than such as my D7200 with a 35mm f1.8 on is (a small lens). But another pal of mine considering the same move went for the D750, which he's delighted with too; so if I do move in the NY it'll be to the D750
3 years from now though, when every niggle has been ironed out I suspect the wee camera systems will be the 'default' for Weddings
Dave
boyfalldown
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 17,486
- Name
- Hugh
- Edit My Images
- No
I tried it. Admittedly using the XT1 (rather than then 2) I so wanted it to work but it just wasn't quiet there. The big feeling I had was it ran out of talent before I did. I run out of talent before my d750. It was also like stepping back a couple of generations camera. I've no tried with the latest versions though
- Messages
- 5,064
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
I have the D750 and XT1, the XT1 is a million miles behind the D750 when it comes to AF-C, you miss vital moments with the XT1 waiting for it to decide to lock focus and take the shot, it sometimes feels like it's taking seconds.
Aa another Fuji v Nikon comparison, a few weeks ago I had both XPro2 and D750 and was surprised how much the AF-C on the Fuji lagged behind that on the the D750.
For me, the Fuji system is fantastic for many genres of photography but action / sports is, in my experience, not one.
I would also think twice about using a Fuji for weddings for that very reason; I would be worried about missing AF on crucial shots.
Those that do use Fuji here for weddings clearly have better photographic techniques than me - which is not difficult !
I must add that XT2 might be a tad better in this respect, I have no experience of that body.
Back to the OP, the D500 would be perfect for weddings, again, IMVHO. That said, FF would be best for the dreamy narrow DoF shots much liked by brides and their mothers.
For me, the Fuji system is fantastic for many genres of photography but action / sports is, in my experience, not one.
I would also think twice about using a Fuji for weddings for that very reason; I would be worried about missing AF on crucial shots.
Those that do use Fuji here for weddings clearly have better photographic techniques than me - which is not difficult !
I must add that XT2 might be a tad better in this respect, I have no experience of that body.
Back to the OP, the D500 would be perfect for weddings, again, IMVHO. That said, FF would be best for the dreamy narrow DoF shots much liked by brides and their mothers.
Last edited:
snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Apparently the XT2 is way more than a tad better, apparently it's night and day and some are saying as good as higher end DSLRs. I'd like to try one myself to see.
I keep reading about how Fuji have improved their AF speed vs Canikon,
However, bear in mind AF is about being accurate as well as fast plus consider 3D tracking. I am not a Fuji expert having owned only XE1 XE2, X10, x100 (T or S ?), plus XPro 2 plus shot with XT1, but their AF-C ability has not overwhelmed me in any case and I have very realistic expectations.
That stated, I would be highly delighted for all XT2 owners if their AF-C is up to Canikon standards.
I clearly need to borrow one and see !
Last edited:
snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
In theory the Fuji should be more accurate as does not have the intolerances of traditional DSLR phase detect, however AF-C on my XT1 is not only slower to react and slower to acquire focus than my D750, I also get far more missed focus shots (I've even had missed shots in AF-S where it's focussed on the background even though it's clearly on the subject when I've reviewed the focus point positioning during playback) . George on the Fuji forum whose job (along with his team) is to shoot F1 has just ditched all of the company's Nikon gear in favour of the XT2, take from that what you will
dan_yorkshire
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,398
- Name
- Dan
- Edit My Images
- Yes
In theory the Fuji should be more accurate as does not have the intolerances of traditional DSLR phase detect, however AF-C on my XT1 is not only slower to react and slower to acquire focus than my D750, I also get far more missed focus shots (I've even had missed shots in AF-S where it's focussed on the background even though it's clearly on the subject when I've reviewed the focus point positioning during playback) . George on the Fuji forum whose job (along with his team) is to shoot F1 has just ditched all of the company's Nikon gear in favour of the XT2, take from that what you will
Thanks for the additional information.
I have only shot F1 once, from the region of Stowe Corner at Silverstone, but have been to a couple of dozen Grands Prix over the years. Of consideration, I think that the cars are quite big and they tend to travel in fairly predictable places so it may or may not be more difficult than shooting small, flitty birds darting all over the place which is what I am more used to shooting. Sounds like George has good experience of both systems and has come down on the side of Fuji for his use' I will take this as a testament to the AF ability of the XT2.
- Messages
- 5,064
- Name
- Dave
- Edit My Images
- Yes
If its not a stupid question - why do you still have a 35mm f1.8 and 85mm f1.8, and even the 50mm f1.4 too - expensive back-ups?
Dave
dan_yorkshire
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,398
- Name
- Dan
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Daren't get rid of them Dave.
I quite often like to head out for a family day out and just have a prime on, nice and light and can get creative.
Might sell the 85 eventually but the other two aren't worth selling, especially the 35mm, so cheap and so good!
boyfalldown
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 17,486
- Name
- Hugh
- Edit My Images
- No
In theory the Fuji should be more accurate as does not have the intolerances of traditional DSLR phase detect, however AF-C on my XT1 is not only slower to react and slower to acquire focus than my D750, I also get far more missed focus shots (I've even had missed shots in AF-S where it's focussed on the background even though it's clearly on the subject when I've reviewed the focus point positioning during playback) . George on the Fuji forum whose job (along with his team) is to shoot F1 has just ditched all of the company's Nikon gear in favour of the XT2, take from that what you will
Interesting about George. I'm a little surprised he feels he has the lenses he needs.
I'd like to try an xt2 with quick moving dogs - see if it can match the d750/70-200 combo for that job
snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
He's bought all new lenses to go with the Fuji, with the 50-140mm f2.8 and 100-400mm I'd imagine this covers track action, then there's a number of nice primes for pitlane stuff etc. Of course, I'm only guessing and George would be able to fill you in better
snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
I agree I don't find motorsports to be amongst the most demanding test of an AF system, but people are rating the XT2.
Swanseajack
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 3,659
- Name
- Simon
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Biggest problem I had with the XT2 was the VF. I was trying the camera and 100-400mm out and there was some Jackdaws in strongish light, but all I could see was black blobs. I loved my XE-1, Xpro1 and XT1 along with the baby Fujis and especially the VF in the XT1 at the time, but after using the D750 and now D810 for a couple of years I prefer the OVF for my main camera now, well for birds anyway.
After a recent heart attack and other disabilities I'm going to get a D500 and the 300mm f4 PF lens as my birding kit and probably the 1.7 TC to get me some reach back over the 600mm I have on FF now.
What wide/walk about lenses to get though, the Nikon 16-80mm and Sigma 18-35mm seem like a good lenses
After a recent heart attack and other disabilities I'm going to get a D500 and the 300mm f4 PF lens as my birding kit and probably the 1.7 TC to get me some reach back over the 600mm I have on FF now.
What wide/walk about lenses to get though, the Nikon 16-80mm and Sigma 18-35mm seem like a good lenses
Last edited:
snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Sorry to hear of your health problems. For APS the 18-35mm F1.8 is supposed to be very nice, but I'd personally prefer the flexibility of the 16-80 for a walk about lens. I use my 24-120mm on FF and find it a very great walkabout.
Swanseajack
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 3,659
- Name
- Simon
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Recently sold my 24-120mm f4 which was the best I have owned out of the three, not sure if that's due to the D810 though as the other two were with the D750. Wanted to try the Sigma 24-35mm f2 and Tamron 15-30mm f2.8 but since the HA, I have returned these lenses and sold what I had, just kept the 50mm, 100mm and 70-30mm for now.
Finally got my appointment with the Spinal Doctor in beginning of January after the failed Shoulder Arthroscopes and Ulnar Nerve Transposition which we have talked about in the past. So maybe best waiting until then, with what set-up I go with going forward.
snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
The 16-80 and 18-35 are DX lenses so no wonder they couldn't match the 24-120mm/D810 if you were using them on the D750.
Swanseajack
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 3,659
- Name
- Simon
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Perhaps I didn't make myself 100% clear, as I thought we were talking about the 24-120mm f4 as you mentioned it!..............I have owned three 24-120mm f4 lenses, the last recent one I used on the D810, the two previous ones were when I was using the D750. I have found sample variation between them and the last one was excellent from the off, without any need for MFA etc..........
Also, I know the 16-80mm and 18-35mm are DX lenses, you must think I'm as dull as you.
.... I was using Nikon Digital when you was still pooing yellow with your Sony.
Last edited:
gad-westy
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 6,527
- Name
- Graham
- Edit My Images
- No
I always think of the sigma 18-35 as one of the best reasons to go dx! Can't be light but what a great option.
Swanseajack
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 3,659
- Name
- Simon
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Amazon have started their Christmas sale as they're down to £479.00 with them now. Tempted, but If I bought the D500 with 16-80mm as a kit, the 16-80mm offers excellent value. I have owned the FF version of the 18-35mm, the 24-35mm f2, heavy but feels very nice in the hand. The first copy was poor until f4 then razor sharp from there onwards, the second was excellent from the off, but as I have recently had some health problems I returned it while I decide what to do.