Any international team has to be a mixture of experience and youth, but you shouldn't overlook a wildcard who is in form though.:shake: I think too many times over the years people in form have lost out because the 'best' players get in the squad everytime, regardless of their form at the time and most of the times do nothing. If you just walk into the team, any team, where is the extra pressure to succeed that competition for your place brings? :shrug:
That said, any friendlies should be used to bring young players into the squad to gain experience. And once qualification for a competition has passed, you can start to experiment a bit more. If you don't actually qualify for a competition you can be a bit more radical with your experimentation. :shrug:
And is there any reason why you can have more players meet up during an international week over the number in the squad who actually have a chance of playing? :shrug:
I know Liverpool are trying to bring the youth players closer to the first team squad to interact more, as the way it is set up now, the youth players are at a different training facility and perhaps feel that the first team is out of reach. If they train with the first team occasionally, they can measure themselves and their progression. And if they prove themselves against the senior players in training, good luck to them.

And when 16 and 17 year olds are getting near the first team, more interaction may bring some young players on sooner.
Do the England squad and Under 21, Under 18 and whatever squads interact together? :shrug: You'd certainly know when someone was ready for the full England team if a young player is bettering a senior play in training sessions.
That could cement notion that once you're a young international you automatically progress through the age ranges, and may exclude late developers.

Teddy Sheringham was 27 on his England debut and Ian Wright was 28.