cobwebscavern
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 422
- Name
- Stephen
- Edit My Images
- No
...as i said...if you are happy and aren't worried that's fine.
Turn on telly and listen to the establishment tell you everything is all right. Everything is all right...there is nothing to worry about.
Thing is with posts like that you seem to be implying that you know differently - but you arent offering any credible evidence that everthing isnt allright, beyond saying that a towpath is going to be shut for a couple of months , which frankly I file under BFD.
seriously have a read of this http://www.mind.org.uk/help/diagnoses_and_conditions/paranoia then look back at your posts on this and other similar 'rights' issues
Oh hang on somebody will say there have been none because security and intelligence is so good at preventing one :nono:OP location Black Country

This simply shows the level of posters we are dealing with here I think eh?
Originally Posted by CaptainPenguin
OP location Black Country
sorry mistook the other guy getting wound up about this for the OP..
Quote: Originally Posted by cobwebscavern
This simply shows the level of posters we are dealing with here I think eh?
make a thread that isnt sensationalist twoddle and i'll give you a serious response.
What would you object to then? Maybe if the banned anyone brown and with a beard from anywhere in London for 2 months?


I always say twoddle, twaddle must be Scottish.
hang on while i get my tinfoil hat.
From google.co.UK
![]()
As opposed to 1,330,000 results for the correct spelling.
Both spellings are correct.![]()
.cobwebscavern said:....and on that note after providing evidence to the contrary.
Good night all and may your own personal imaginary friend in the sky with a big white beard look after you.
cobwebscavern said:Ah yes...Urban Dictionary..the home of the "Cleveland Steamer" et al....always a good place to base your research on.
Ah yes...Urban Dictionary..the home of the "Cleveland Steamer" et al....always a good place to base your research on.
I'm surprised twaddlegate has overtaken the initial discussion.
On second thoughts...![]()

)Yeah they ran the inaugral colyford 'rebel run' last wednesday and acess to my road for motor vehicles was suspened for 90 minuites - this was clearly an abuse of my human rights on a scale of tianmen square , as I had to wait until 20.30 before i could go to tescos to buy my tea
(or it could have just been a minor inconvenience I had to work round)
You were denied adequate nutrition![]()

Yeah they ran the inaugral colyford 'rebel run' last wednesday and acess to my road for motor vehicles was suspened for 90 minuites - this was clearly an abuse of my human rights on a scale of tianmen square , as I had to wait until 20.30 before i could go to tescos to buy my tea
(or it could have just been a minor inconvenience I had to work round)
You were denied adequate nutrition![]()
During the summer riots last year we thought the disaffected youth in colyford was going to kick off too - however we just gave him a slap and told him to wind his neck in

I just spat Pepsi over my computer.....you owe me a new keyboard.jon ryan said:The Provisional Wing of the Colyford Residents Association can get quite nasty. You should have seen the reaction a few years ago when the Midweek Herald billed Colyford Goose Fair as ColyTON Goose Fair. We had to sacrifice a sub-editor to appease them and it was only because the UN were able to rush in some extra barrels of Branoc that Colyton was not razed to the ground.
Worst riots I've had to cover since Sidmouth Waitrose ran out of sun dried tomatoes and copies of the Daily Telegraph on the same day.
I can picture it the scene.You know something?
Earlier this week a security guard standing on Park Lane in central London thrust his hand into a photographer's lens and told him that the wasn't allowed to take photographs there.
The bloke was a press snapper?
The venue was the pavement outside The Hilton.
The reason given was Olympic Security.
The security guard was from G4S.
If that story had been posted on here instead of a towpath closure, then people would have been bating for blood.
Not all of the LOG restrictions are driven by sound security reasoning. Several are driven by either commercialism, poor forethought or just bad training.
Tell that to Pastor Niemoller Linky
viv1969 said:Where did you see / hear this?
IF it's true then the "guard" in question was a d*ck...pure and simple. Plenty of them around befor the games, and there's be plenty left after.
It's true. There's no need to post IF quite like that.
Sheesh...well forgive me for a typo why don't ya, and get back in the pram. :baby:
Actually Hugh, no. Please show me in my post where I disagreed with Mark?
But because I commit the ultimate sin of a typo, he get's all snotty in his reply....and you too for that matter.
To explain myself better, I was stopped several years ago by some jumped up private uniform outside the National Gallery, who made a grab for my camera and told me I couldn't take pictures of the gallery frontage. They love to think they have powers that they don't actually have, and although the Olympics is giving them carte-blanche for a few weeks, there will still be private sector uniformed morons on the streets of London long after the circus has left town.
.............But this thread is about the Olympics
It might have been, briefly. Seems to have descended into complete paranoia since then. I think I'll don my foil cap and sit in a corner until it all blows over.