The Fabulous Fuji X owners thread

Thanks.
Used prices for the Vi seem to be anywhere between £1499 and £1950 depending on the shop.

£200 more than the average for a V seems to be a good deal...?
 
Thanks. I'm going to pop into a couple of stores tomorrow and see one in person.
I'm a little concerned it's not that much smaller in reality and maybe I need to be thinking about a true high quality compact...
 
Personally, I like the 26MP sensor, and am more than happy with the 100V, but if you've got the X-T5 I'd be tempted to pay the extra £200 to have the same sensor on both cameras.

The X100 is much more compact that an X-Tx with a pancake lens, and is my preferred set up for travelling light.
 
As an alternative view, I think the extras you get on the VI aren’t worth the premium. Unless you plan on doing video I think IBIS is unnecessary for this type of camera.

Finally, the image quality will be exactly the same; and I think in some aspects the smaller sensor performs better - like in low light. I’ve said before on here that I’ve found my X-T50 to be lacking as much vibe as my X-T20; I think the colours are a little worse and the 40mp sensor is a double edged sword.

If I was getting a second body (and I plan to) I’d want something different from the body I have; and so I plan on getting an X100F or X-E3.

In real world scenarios no one (certainly not me) would be able to tell the difference between a 26mp shot and a 40mp shot of the same subject in the same location - without pixel peeping at least
 
Last edited:
colourofsound said:
As an alternative view, I think the extras you get on the VI aren’t worth the premium. Unless you plan on doing video I think IBIS is unnecessary for this type of camera.

Finally, the image quality will be exactly the same; and I think in some aspects the smaller sensor performs better - like in low light. I’ve said before on here that I’ve found my X-T50 to be lacking as much vibe as my X-T20; I think the colours are a little worse and the 40mp sensor is a double edged sword.

If I was getting a second body (and I plan to) I’d want something different from the body I have; and so I plan on getting an X100F or X-E3.

In real world scenarios no one (certainly not me) would be able to tell the difference between a 26mp shot and a 40mp shot of the same subject in the same location - without pixel peeping at least
Click to expand...

I've had an X-T3, X100VI, and X-T5.

You're right about image quality - Once you get above 8mp (4k), not much improves other than cropability. If anything the 26mp is a little cleaner in low light.

Size wise, for me there isn't enough in it. Both an X100 and an X-T5 + pancake are just "about the size of a camera". Neither is pocketable. Shaving 10mm off here and there wasn't worth the added price of the x100.

As for the X100 - I'd considered one for a few years, and the X100VI was the one that sold me on the idea. As said above, the main bonus of the resolution is cropability - a major boon on a fixed lens camera. You've essentially got a native 23mm and a 35mm by virtue of cropping. Bolt on the wide/tele adapters, and combined with crops you get quite a focal range.
The IBIS is absolutely worth it. Not just at night but anywhere with "less light" such as forests etc.
Standalone, it's a fantastic camera, and the upgrades from the X100V are definitely worth it, no question. But as a second body, I just couldn't justify it - but everyone is different in that regard.
 
Thanks all. .
I've had a look at a few in some stores today and given the lack of size difference am now decided against an X100V or IV.

I did however see two smaller options in the Fuji House of Photography - the X-T50 and the X-m5.

I also saw a Leica D-Lux 7 (can I say that in here?:oops: :$) in Park but have no idea if that's anywhere near comparable. Time for more research methinks.
 
beercan said:
Thanks all. .
I've had a look at a few in some stores today and given the lack of size difference am now decided against an X100V or IV.

I did however see two smaller options in the Fuji House of Photography - the X-T50 and the X-m5.

I also saw a Leica D-Lux 7 (can I say that in here?:oops: :$) in Park but have no idea if that's anywhere near comparable. Time for more research methinks.
Click to expand...
X-M5 is tiny, no viewfinder, same 26mp sensor as the V / X-E4. Not sure if its a better processor though.

I have the X-T50 and I don't think the size difference will be enough for you if you feel that way about the X100
 
beercan said:
Thanks all. .
I've had a look at a few in some stores today and given the lack of size difference am now decided against an X100V or IV.

I did however see two smaller options in the Fuji House of Photography - the X-T50 and the X-m5.

I also saw a Leica D-Lux 7 (can I say that in here?:oops: :$) in Park but have no idea if that's anywhere near comparable. Time for more research methinks.
Click to expand...

The current D-Lux 8 is a nice camera, this has much better phone interface than previous models and supports Lieca Looks, the equivalent to fim simulations, the menu and the body have been made much more mini-Q3 like. But its a small sensor (Micro 4/3), and many of crop modes don't use the whole sensor, but on the plus side you get a reasonably fast zoom lens. Once you add the clever hood/lens cover and the grip its price exceeds that of the X100VI. The D-Lux 7 is not the current model, and the D-Lux 8 is about as available as the X100VI - ie pre-order!!

BTW the X-M5 must be discounted as its not a camera as it has no viewfinder (IMHO :) )

I'd wait until Thursday and see if the new 23mm pancake materialises, then you have some options for the X-T5
 
Last edited:
If you're looking for something much smaller which is a comparable quality, maybe consider the Ricoh GR. If you're not buying an interchangeable lens body then it really doesn't matter which brand it is. I'd love a GR as a second body but its too expensive for me at the moment.
 
colourofsound said:
If you're looking for something much smaller which is a comparable quality, maybe consider the Ricoh GR. If you're not buying an interchangeable lens body then it really doesn't matter which brand it is. I'd love a GR as a second body but its too expensive for me at the moment.
Click to expand...

I refer the gentleman to the comment above applies to GR cameras................................. :)

Mr Perceptive said:
BTW the X-M5 must be discounted as its not a camera as it has no viewfinder (IMHO :) )
Click to expand...
 
Having looked at the Ricoh GRiii and the Sony RX100vii today and being concerned at the lack of dials, I think I'm going to wait for the X-E5 launch.

Assuming the X-E5 is the same size as the 4 it could be a good solution.
Below is the X-E4 compared to the X-T5 and X-T50.
Shame it's not out in time for my hols!

1000118451.jpg
 
beercan said:
Having looked at the Ricoh GRiii and the Sony RX100vii today and being concerned at the lack of dials, I think I'm going to wait for the X-E5 launch.

Assuming the X-E5 is the same size as the 4 it could be a good solution.
Below is the X-E4 compared to the X-T5 and X-T50.
Shame it's not out in time for my hols!

View attachment 455230
Click to expand...

If you do use the viewfinder/EVF for most of your photography, then you will need to adjust your expectations with these 'lesser' Fuji cameras, all of the X-Tx0 cameras, X100 series and X-E cameras have smaller EVF's (often in resolution and in terms of magnification), this can make a huge difference to your shooting experience if you like the larger, high resolution viewfinder in the X-T5, you may find the other cameras challenging.

Obviously if you are using your camera in a non-photography way and using just the rear screen this will not apply :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
I tend to use both the rear screen and evf depending on the task at hand.
 
Mr Perceptive said:
If you do use the viewfinder/EVF for most of your photography, then you will need to adjut your expectations with these 'lesser' Fuji cameras, all of the X-Tx0 cameras, X100 series and X-E cameras have smaller EVF's (often in resolution and in terms of magnification), this can make a huge difference to your shooting experience if you like the larger, high resolution viewfinder in the X-T5, you may find the other cameras challenging.

Obviously if you are using your camera in a non-photography way and using just the rear screen this will not apply :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
I can vouch for this. When I had my X-T30 I thought it was fine, but I got an X-T1 as a second body, and although it was missing a lot of the newer features of the T30, it did feel like a much nicer shooting experience, mainly due to the bigger EVF.
 
colourofsound said:
As an alternative view, I think the extras you get on the VI aren’t worth the premium. Unless you plan on doing video I think IBIS is unnecessary for this type of camera.

Finally, the image quality will be exactly the same; and I think in some aspects the smaller sensor performs better - like in low light. I’ve said before on here that I’ve found my X-T50 to be lacking as much vibe as my X-T20; I think the colours are a little worse and the 40mp sensor is a double edged sword.

If I was getting a second body (and I plan to) I’d want something different from the body I have; and so I plan on getting an X100F or X-E3.

In real world scenarios no one (certainly not me) would be able to tell the difference between a 26mp shot and a 40mp shot of the same subject in the same location - without pixel peeping at least
Click to expand...

You make some very good points here, I have an X-T20 and I plan to keep it until it dies, the image quality is lovely and in reality, 24mp is more than enough for me and most other casual photographers. I do sometimes wish it had IBIS, but that isn't a deal breaker for me.

Oddly though, I also have an X100F and although it's near enough the same age, 2018 (ish), and lacks a touch screen, it feels more modern compared to the X-T20.
 
I still use my X-T2 occasionally, I think that the 24MP sensor still holds its own.

Although I wouldn't be reliably getting shots like this of my son racing earlier today on my X-T2, whereas with the X-H2s most of the shots are in focus.


LRCX3578 by Lewis Craik, on Flickr
 
nx4737 said:
You make some very good points here, I have an X-T20 and I plan to keep it until it dies, the image quality is lovely and in reality, 24mp is more than enough for me and most other casual photographers. I do sometimes wish it had IBIS, but that isn't a deal breaker for me.

Oddly though, I also have an X100F and although it's near enough the same age, 2018 (ish), and lacks a touch screen, it feels more modern compared to the X-T20.
Click to expand...
I always turn the touch screens off anyway! Just end up taking a picture with my nose otherwise :ROFLMAO:

Let me know if you ever fancy getting rid of the X100F ;)
 
colourofsound said:
I always turn the touch screens off anyway! Just end up taking a picture with my nose otherwise :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...

skullfunkerry said:
On my X-T4 I mostly keep the screen folded in for exactly the same reason :)
Click to expand...


One of the nice things about the current Leica user interface, is that you can set it to turn off the touchscreen during shooting, but retain it for Q-menu and menu functions. Mine you that alone isn't worth the price difference :ROFLMAO:
 
colourofsound said:
I always turn the touch screens off anyway! Just end up taking a picture with my nose otherwise :ROFLMAO:

Let me know if you ever fancy getting rid of the X100F ;)
Click to expand...

It's the other way around for me, I end up jabbing away at the X100F screen, forgetting it isn't a touch screen!
 
FujiRumors has released the following -

  • Fujifilm X-E5 Body: $1699
  • Fujifilm X-E5 with XF23mmF2.8: $1,899

That's some pretty wild pricing... $1700 with no lens? That's X-T5 money with no weather sealing? Smaller EVF? One-way flippy screen? Yikes.

You can grab an R8 for $1300, a Zf for $1800, even an A7Cii for $2000...

Who knows, maybe that's US only pricing because of tariffs, but I doubt it...
 
Considering they've moved a lot of production to Japan to avoid tariffs, if the X-E5 is in that camp, that's insane.
If it's north of £1,200 body only, I'm out.
 
jimmyjamjojo said:
FujiRumors has released the following -

  • Fujifilm X-E5 Body: $1699
  • Fujifilm X-E5 with XF23mmF2.8: $1,899

That's some pretty wild pricing... $1700 with no lens? That's X-T5 money with no weather sealing? Smaller EVF? One-way flippy screen? Yikes.

You can grab an R8 for $1300, a Zf for $1800, even an A7Cii for $2000...

Who knows, maybe that's US only pricing because of tariffs, but I doubt it...
Click to expand...

In that list, I'll be getting an XT5. Or a used A74, or go back to Canon R8 with a lens!
 
The new 23mm might be of interest, but likely £400 for lens on it's own :(
 
Mr Perceptive said:
If you do use the viewfinder/EVF for most of your photography, then you will need to adjust your expectations with these 'lesser' Fuji cameras, all of the X-Tx0 cameras, X100 series and X-E cameras have smaller EVF's (often in resolution and in terms of magnification), this can make a huge difference to your shooting experience if you like the larger, high resolution viewfinder in the X-T5, you may find the other cameras challenging.

Obviously if you are using your camera in a non-photography way and using just the rear screen this will not apply :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...
You literally fitted a periscope to your GFX so I’m not sure you have an impartial view on the points you raise :p
 
Last edited:
I’ve been running the X100VI through its paces for the last 3 weeks, extremely impressive piece of kit. What I’m finding which surprised me somewhat is how little tweaking the files need in post. Auto WB, exposure and colours are spot on, this surprised me having owned a lot of previous Fuji models, it just works.
 
imattersuk said:
I’ve been running the X100VI through its paces for the last 3 weeks, extremely impressive piece of kit. What I’m finding which surprised me somewhat is how little tweaking the files need in post. Auto WB, exposure and colours are spot on, this surprised me having owned a lot of previous Fuji models, it just works.
Click to expand...

13 years and 5 versions of X-Trans to get there ................................... looks for tongue in cheek emoji ....................................
 
imattersuk said:
I’ve been running the X100VI through its paces for the last 3 weeks, extremely impressive piece of kit. What I’m finding which surprised me somewhat is how little tweaking the files need in post. Auto WB, exposure and colours are spot on, this surprised me having owned a lot of previous Fuji models, it just works.
Click to expand...

I find the same with the 'f' tbh I do very little editing to my Fuji files.
 
imattersuk said:
I’ve been running the X100VI through its paces for the last 3 weeks, extremely impressive piece of kit. What I’m finding which surprised me somewhat is how little tweaking the files need in post. Auto WB, exposure and colours are spot on, this surprised me having owned a lot of previous Fuji models, it just works.
Click to expand...
Yup, my X100S has an arty purple tinge to all shots, the X100VI is excellent. Really brings out the best in the film sims. The auto WB improvements have been a big improvement in recent cameras particularly Sony + Fuji. Just saves a bunch of time fiddling in post.
 
A candid street style Snap captured a lady in a fast food joint, savouring her coffee and other treats. As I snapped her through the window, she gave me a lovely smile.

"Spotted With A Smile"

Spotted With A Smile-03975 by G.K.Jnr., on Flickr
 
addicknchips said:
X-e5 announced. £1,300 for the body.
Click to expand...

I think Fuji have borrowed Canon's Cripple Hammer and taken it to the EVF

X-E5 0.39in 2.36K
X100VI 0.5in 3.69K

In my mind at £1549 for the X-E5 + XF23mm F2.8 bundle, I'd be taking the X100VI, and for £50 be gaining a better EVF and faster lens (not to mention, leaf shutter, built in ND filter, OVF, etc, etc)
 
I think this was touched on a few weeks ago.
One of my pet hates on the xt50 is knocking the joystick and send the focus point off to the edge.
I had got round this a bit by setting it to press joystick to recenter.
But have found a slightly better way now.
Not sure which models this works on, if you hold the menu button down for about 3 seconds, you get a yellow lock picture on the screen.
When this is on, it locks anything you have set for this in the menu. I have just tested with the joystick so far.
If I need a different focus point, just hold menu for 3 again and the lock is off
 
leaky5 said:
I think this was touched on a few weeks ago.
One of my pet hates on the xt50 is knocking the joystick and send the focus point off to the edge.
I had got round this a bit by setting it to press joystick to recenter.
But have found a slightly better way now.
Not sure which models this works on, if you hold the menu button down for about 3 seconds, you get a yellow lock picture on the screen.
When this is on, it locks anything you have set for this in the menu. I have just tested with the joystick so far.
If I need a different focus point, just hold menu for 3 again and the lock is off
Click to expand...

The lock has been available on Fuji cameras for a long time.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top