The Fabulous Fuji X owners thread

Just renewed my acquaintance with the Fuji X-T4 and looking for a fish to use with it. What is the usual to use. I don't want to spend a fortune as it will only be used maybe once or twice a year.
 
I have a couple of fish for my Fuji X a circular 6.5mm f2.0 made by Meike and a Samyang 8mm f2.8 rectilinear both can be picked up used or new and I think you will find a few more on eBay
 
www.ebay.co.uk

7artisans 12mm f2.8 for Fuji X Mount | eBay

<p>You are invited to place bids on this 7artisans 12mm f2.8 for Fuji X Mount, the lens is is in superb condition & has been used on my Fujifilm X Mount cameras. This is a fully manual lens no electronic contacts to the camera body, to use manual lenses on Fujifilm cameras set “release without...
www.ebay.co.uk

 
Fisheye converters are another option that you can fit to a wide prime or zoom a series 7 and a stepping ring will do the job for occasional use I think you can even get a fisheye lens body cap
cheapy here
www.ebay.co.uk

Rockstar 10mm F8 Wide angle Fisheye Lens For Canon Nikon Sony Fuji M4/3 Camera | eBay

Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Rockstar 10mm F8 Wide angle Fisheye Lens For Canon Nikon Sony Fuji M4/3 Camera at the best online prices at eBay! Free delivery for many products!
www.ebay.co.uk
 
Last edited:
Low Tide



20mm; ISO200; f11; 1/150

X-T1; XC 15-45: PP in C1 and finished in Silver Efex Pro 2
 
FlyPhot said:
Low Tide



20mm; ISO200; f11; 1/150

X-T1; XC 15-45: PP in C1 and finished in Silver Efex Pro 2
Click to expand...
Excellent Jim, I'd have that professionally printed large and hung proudly on a wall at home, superb photographic skills Sir..!!!

Regards;
Peter
 
macvisual said:
Excellent Jim, I'd have that professionally printed large and hung proudly on a wall at home, superb photographic skills Sir..!!!

Regards;
Peter
Click to expand...

Wow! Thanks Peter, lovely comment.
 
Leroy4bz said:
Go on Nick, rub it in. I saw three today....bloody greys
Click to expand...
Actually it is quite novel to see the greys when we go to the mainland, they let you get so much closer than the reds. Off for a stroll later to see if I can get a glimpse of our sea eagles which have been released on the Island. So far only seen them at a distance!
 
Paulie-W said:
Something a little different ....

Forget-Me-Nots

H1 80mm

Forget-Me-Not by Paulie-W, on Flickr
Click to expand...

I have to say seeing your macro shots is not good for my self-control!
Always wanted to play with a Macro lens and being in lockdown feels a good time to do it....
 
chrism_scotland said:
I have to say seeing your macro shots is not good for my self-control!
Always wanted to play with a Macro lens and being in lockdown feels a good time to do it....
Click to expand...

I enjoy it, Chris. Always liked macro, but not bugs lol there's so much about the house you can experiment with :)

Go for it ;)
 
swiftflo said:
Just renewed my acquaintance with the Fuji X-T4 and looking for a fish to use with it. What is the usual to use. I don't want to spend a fortune as it will only be used maybe once or twice a year.
Click to expand...
Oh dear, made a cockup there, please alter "fish to flash". These modern computers !!!!!!!.
 
swiftflo said:
Oh dear, made a cockup there, please alter "fish to flash". These modern computers !!!!!!!.
Click to expand...

Godox work well with fuji. I have 2 680's and an X1 trigger. Very happy with them.
 
Fuji Dave said:
Got to be Godox, they work great and do the job well.
Click to expand...
I do have a Neewer TT680 which I bought to use with my Canon gear. The instruction booklet with this talks about it being a Godox flash, (I.e."thanks for purchasing this Godox flash")do you think that maybe this will work on my X-T4 ?. I don't really want to try it on the camera in case it fry's the electronics on the camera.
 
swiftflo said:
I do have a Neewer TT680 which I bought to use with my Canon gear. The instruction booklet with this talks about it being a Godox flash, (I.e."thanks for purchasing this Godox flash")do you think that maybe this will work on my X-T4 ?. I don't really want to try it on the camera in case it fry's the electronics on the camera.
Click to expand...


If you have a Fuji trigger then it should be fine to use, but have never heard a flash wreck a camera though.
 
Fuji Dave said:
If you have a Fuji trigger then it should be fine to use, but have never heard a flash wreck a camera though.
Click to expand...

No I don't have a Fuji trigger, I have only ever used the flash on Camera. What is this trigger ?.
 
swiftflo said:
I do have a Neewer TT680 which I bought to use with my Canon gear. The instruction booklet with this talks about it being a Godox flash, (I.e."thanks for purchasing this Godox flash")do you think that maybe this will work on my X-T4 ?. I don't really want to try it on the camera in case it fry's the electronics on the camera.
Click to expand...


If you got it for only your Canon, I'd not try it at all on the X-T4 as the pins on the flash might be different and you don't want to wreck the T4.
 
Many thanks to you all, just tried the flash on my X-T4 and it works okay, will think about purchasing a trigger.
 
Fuji Dave said:
If you got it for only your Canon, I'd not try it at all on the X-T4 as the pins on the flash might be different and you don't want to wreck the T4.
Click to expand...

Checked the pins on the flash + camera and they are the same, so I thought give it ago and as I have said pleased with that.
 
DSCF3313.jpg


The magnificent Red Kite soaring over a roadkill Pheasant outside my house just as I was trying out my newly arrived X-T4 body with the 100-400mm. We are built into the hillside so the Kite was almost level with me at times.

Still trying to get the hang of BIF, but the X-T4 is much better at tracking than the X-T3 and the Smallrig L bracket really helps with handling and grip. RAW, processed with Capture 1 and taken about 150m from the Kite.

DSCF3333 2.jpg
 
How many of you guys have swapped your 55-200s for 70-300s already?
 
patr said:
Sold my 55-200 when the 50-140 mysteriously arrived and the 70-300 is on order. Probably stuck in the Suez Canal!
Click to expand...
Been thinking of the 50-140 too, but the 70-300 is possibly a more practical lens for me at the moment.

I have to wait til next weekend to find the boxes etc before I can sell my 18-55 and 55-200 to fund one though!
 
AJQS said:
Been thinking of the 50-140 too, but the 70-300 is possibly a more practical lens for me at the moment.

I have to wait til next weekend to find the boxes etc before I can sell my 18-55 and 55-200 to fund one though!
Click to expand...

I love my 50-140, in fact I'm moving on my 90mm because I no longer use it. Two things with the 50-140 though.

1) It's heavy. I really notice when it's in my bag.
2) Close focus distance is awful, I tend to use it with a a tube if I want to get close to anything.

It is a stunning lens though...
 
AJQS said:
How many of you guys have swapped your 55-200s for 70-300s already?
Click to expand...
Swapped my 50-140 for the 70-300. Picked it up on Tuesday...first impressions are excellent, am impressed by the lack of distortion (barrel/pincushion), lack of vignetting wide open and overall sharpness, particularly at f/8, and surprisingly f/16.
 
AJQS said:
Been thinking of the 50-140 too, but the 70-300 is possibly a more practical lens for me at the moment.

I have to wait til next weekend to find the boxes etc before I can sell my 18-55 and 55-200 to fund one though!
Click to expand...

The 50-140 is a stunning lens but it is a heavy b****r. I think the 70-300 will be a lovely lens and as I do have both tele-converters, it will be interesting to travel a bit lighter!
 
I love my 50-140 f2.8 and I can't see myself replacing it with any other lens even though its not the lightest for the reseons below:

- Very fast
- Very sharp
- Constant F2.8 through out the zoom range
- Versatile zoom range
- Works excellent with the 1.4TC (other lenses are ok with the 1.4TC but only with good light)
 
Jelster said:
2) Close focus distance is awful, I tend to use it with a a tube if I want to get close to anything.
Click to expand...

Just had to look that up and yes, it is lacking somewhat isn't it? I'd like to test one first of course but I think that might actually kill that lens for me as I like to get in close to stuff. Long way off if I ever do get it anyway, 8-16 and 100-400 are ahead of it in my dream line up queue!
 
My elderly neighbour had a fall about 2am so I went out to see what the moaning was, so phoned 999 and they took her to hospital for a check up as she hurt her wrist. Her daughter and son just knocked on the door and gave me these as a thank you. Their Mum is now back home.

X100V and just a quick shot.

Yellow Rose by Dave, on Flickr

Roses by Dave, on Flickr

Flowers by Dave, on Flickr
 
Its probably been spoken about on here before but is there any advantage using uncompressed vs lossless compressed? The file size is double so surely there has to be an advantage but based on my very quick google search I dont see any benefits
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top