The Fabulous Fuji X owners thread

Manxmaid said:
It was the local airport fire station, Rick. They were using a 'fuselage' for the exercise.
Click to expand...
Hi Andrea, thanks for that, I thought it looked like that, We have a similar rig here at our airport. :)
 
rick448 said:
Hi Andrea, thanks for that, I thought it looked like that, We have a similar rig here at our airport. :)
Click to expand...

Yes, I thought it might look familiar to you :) It was a great chance for us to see them training and we are supplying a set of images for them.
 
Jelster said:
@weebleswobble Donna, I do envy those views of the Corfe Castle, stunning on a day like this.
Click to expand...
Don't want to rub it in, but my view from the office window is very similar (but today these were taken on the road and in a field nearby). Looking forward to welcoming people back to Dorset and being able to travel again (I want to head up north for a holiday).
G.K.Jnr. said:
Three very nice landscape style Fujigraphs Donna, liking all of these very much with #3 being my fav'.
Click to expand...
Thanks, I jumped out of the car for this (stopped it first...) - one of my favourite spots for the castle as so easy to access
Earley Man said:
If they were mine I would keep No.1 as a lovely environmental portrait of my dog and for No.3 I would have a large print made and hang it on the wall.
Click to expand...
Thanks, yes I have a soft spot for photographing the dog but maybe not one for the wall
minimaltoo said:
Definitely the 3rd one - that's great.
Click to expand...
Thank you
Mr Perceptive said:
@weebleswobble I like the 3rd too, but it might be worth experimenting with a more drastic crop, loosing some of the grass foreground and that some of the right hand hill to balance the image better.
Click to expand...
Thanks, I will give that a go. I quite liked the lines in the field but maybe it is a little too dark
 
weebleswobble said:
Don't want to rub it in, but my view from the office window is very similar (but today these were taken on the road and in a field nearby). Looking forward to welcoming people back to Dorset and being able to travel again (I want to head up north for a holiday).
Click to expand...

Well you're less than an hour away from me (I'm almost in Dorset, about 1.5 miles...from the border) so I may take you up on that when life gets back to normal.
 
With me not getting out much at all at the moment, and when I do, struggling to take even an X-T2 or 3 body with the 100-400 (I like shooting the birds) I have started to consider whether I should look at Micro 2 Thirds as a suitable alternative.

I know I would miss the "analogue" approach of the Fuji, but there's not much point if it's not being used. Anyone here had experience of M2T, especially the Olympus range?
 
Jelster said:
With me not getting out much at all at the moment, and when I do, struggling to take even an X-T2 or 3 body with the 100-400 (I like shooting the birds) I have started to consider whether I should look at Micro 2 Thirds as a suitable alternative.

I know I would miss the "analogue" approach of the Fuji, but there's not much point if it's not being used. Anyone here had experience of M2T, especially the Olympus range?
Click to expand...

I think you mean Micro 4/3 , micro 2/3 would have an itsy-bitsy sensor :ROFLMAO:

I've had an OMD-1 MkII for a couple of weeks on loan from Olympus, not long lenses though, but it was quick with AF and IQ was good (though ultimately not as good as the Fuji).

I know that sometimes gear changes re-invigorate the photo mojo, but other times its just something to do, and is often full of regret. Personally I would look long and hard at why you are nmot taking your existing kit out, and don't make any decisions in a hurry!
 
Mr Perceptive said:
I think you mean Micro 4/3 , micro 2/3 would have an itsy-bitsy sensor :ROFLMAO:

I've had an OMD-1 MkII for a couple of weeks on loan from Olympus, not long lenses though, but it was quick with AF and IQ was good (though ultimately not as good as the Fuji).

I know that sometimes gear changes re-invigorate the photo mojo, but other times its just something to do, and is often full of regret. Personally I would look long and hard at why you are nmot taking your existing kit out, and don't make any decisions in a hurry!
Click to expand...

Nothing will be done in a hurry David, it's only a couple of years since I did a full system change from Canon to Fuji. I can take the gear out but the following day my back is shagged which takes 3-5 days to clear. Lighter is better, but I need the length (so to speak)...
 
Jelster said:
Nothing will be done in a hurry David, it's only a couple of years since I did a full system change from Canon to Fuji. I can take the gear out but the following day my back is shagged which takes 3-5 days to clear. Lighter is better, but I need the length (so to speak)...
Click to expand...

New 70-300 is a fraction of the weight of the 100-400 and can take the TC's - is that an option?
 
Jelster said:
Nothing will be done in a hurry David, it's only a couple of years since I did a full system change from Canon to Fuji. I can take the gear out but the following day my back is shagged which takes 3-5 days to clear. Lighter is better, but I need the length (so to speak)...
Click to expand...

I don't know your situation Mr Jelster, but would it be possible to change the way you work and avoid stressing your back quite so much?
 
Dryce said:
I immediately liked this. Every so often on these forums there is an image that makes me sit up and notice. This is one of them.
Click to expand...
Thank you - thats very kind of you to say so. Appreciated!
 
Plain Nev said:
I don't know your situation Mr Jelster, but would it be possible to change the way you work and avoid stressing your back quite so much?
Click to expand...

It's hard to go out with a long lens and not get the weight. The 100-400 is a lot lighter than my old 150-600, but it's still heavy. I sometimes take a monopod, which helps.
 
Jelster said:
With me not getting out much at all at the moment, and when I do, struggling to take even an X-T2 or 3 body with the 100-400 (I like shooting the birds) I have started to consider whether I should look at Micro 2 Thirds as a suitable alternative.

I know I would miss the "analogue" approach of the Fuji, but there's not much point if it's not being used. Anyone here had experience of M2T, especially the Olympus range?
Click to expand...
I tried it and soon jumped back to Fuji, some swear by it but personally I think it would be a big step backwards for you.
 
imattersuk said:
I tried it and soon jumped back to Fuji, some swear by it but personally I think it would be a big step backwards for you.
Click to expand...

Anyway @Jelster, you just need to sneak up on them, taken with the 16-55 this morning (only lens I had on me), and its not that heavy a crop, I got within about 6ft!

mj0ZiPbh.jpg
 
Out of interest, what's the going price for a used 90mm f2?

It's been sitting in the camera cupboard for over 6 months without use so I may as well liquidate some cash.
 
I'm thinking about wide-angle options for my Fuji X-Pro2/X-E2s.

One of my favourite lenses on my old Nikons is the Sigma 10-20 and I have a Nikon/Fuji manual adaptor......so its possible that I can stick with that........but I'm wondering what other options to explore. TBH I'm not really minded to splash out on a Fuji XF 10-24 even at used prices..............and the very affordable 16mm f2.8 prime isn't that much wider than the 18-55 lens I've already got.

So............suggestions/comments please about the third party offerings out there

Cheers
 
Mountkeen said:
I'm thinking about wide-angle options for my Fuji X-Pro2/X-E2s.

One of my favourite lenses on my old Nikons is the Sigma 10-20 and I have a Nikon/Fuji manual adaptor......so its possible that I can stick with that........but I'm wondering what other options to explore. TBH I'm not really minded to splash out on a Fuji XF 10-24 even at used prices..............and the very affordable 16mm f2.8 prime isn't that much wider than the 18-55 lens I've already got.

So............suggestions/comments please about the third party offerings out there

Cheers
Click to expand...

Cheap and good is the Samyang 12mm - s/h around £175 - manual focus though, but really not a problem with something so wide, just stick it around 2m and everything from your feet to the horizon will be in focus!
 
I have been experimenting with old lenses at the moment. Pentax, Helios etc. But fear not, I have returned to the fold with this one. It was taken with a Fuji 35mm lens with an M42 mount and a massive great aperture of 3.5. But it does produce some stunning results. I was amazed, to be honest. I think you'd struggle to tell it apart from a modern lens.

DSCF0705 (2) by Neville Watkins, on Flickr
 
Jelster said:
With me not getting out much at all at the moment, and when I do, struggling to take even an X-T2 or 3 body with the 100-400 (I like shooting the birds) I have started to consider whether I should look at Micro 2 Thirds as a suitable alternative.

I know I would miss the "analogue" approach of the Fuji, but there's not much point if it's not being used. Anyone here had experience of M2T, especially the Olympus range?
Click to expand...

Not sure this is going to be much of a help Steve because it might well be not a lot lighter but a mate of mine is a very good bird tog went from a Sony A9 and 100-400 to the Olympus OM1 mk3 and 300mm f4 and he has no regrets at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top