I think you can do both in-camera with xt20
Viltrox-10 by Pete Downham Photography, on Flickr
The weight is the one thing that put me off it the X-H1
Ouch, wishing you a speedy recovery Mr POK here is the image to remind you to take extra care especially if solo landscape togging, and I for one will certainly think twice before going out alone, I had known of Greg's Whitton's incident, and obviously my friend who was with me had also previously broken his ankle, but you never think these things are going to happen to you. You'll still have to wait for the landscape pictures, not sure if the X100F still works ok, its taken a bit of a beating, but this is a phone snap of the surgeon's phone copy of the X-Ray
The Llanberis mountain rescue team where simply phenomenal (I will definitely be making a significant donation to them), as were the team at Bangor hospital, who are possibly are more used to this kind of injury than many hospitals. The newspaper reports of swearing that could be heard across the valley are definitely exaggerated, as even my lungs cannot drown out a helicopter!!! There may have been a bit of the Queen's best English as my ankle was reset on the mountainside!!! The whole thing was a very scary experience and not one I wish to repeat.
I'm back at home now, with quite a long path of recovery ahead. Just think twice before flying solo!!!
![]()
I know you said you would get out more with the camera LOL
I'm back at home now, with quite a long path of recovery ahead. Just think twice before flying solo!!!
I know you said you would get out more with the camera LOL
Fair point, mate. Fair point ... But I`m not quite there yet That about sums up my thoughts. They are all great cameras, but I d think it I had to pick one it would be the H1, if it had the faster AF of the T3 it would be pretty much perfect.The X-H1 is my favourite Fuji having owned/used most of them. I prefer it to my X-T3 and the deal at the moment with the grip is nothing short of a steal but I would try and get to hold one as the difference in ergonomics and weight over the X100 series is a tad severe!
Had a wander up The Stiperstones the other morning for a freezing cold sunrise..
XT2, 16-55, edited in CO then PS
Stiperstones Sunrise by Jason, on Flickr
Nice, I'd like to see a colour version of that.Street corner in Havana. Once you're away from the "honeypots" of Old Havana the dystopian nature if the city's neighbourhoods becomes more and more apparent.
X-E2s and 18-55mm lens
In Need Of Restoration by Aimless Alliterations, on Flickr
OK here is the image to remind you to take extra care especially if solo landscape togging, and I for one will certainly think twice before going out alone, I had known of Greg's Whitton's incident, and obviously my friend who was with me had also previously broken his ankle, but you never think these things are going to happen to you. You'll still have to wait for the landscape pictures, not sure if the X100F still works ok, its taken a bit of a beating, but this is a phone snap of the surgeon's phone copy of the X-Ray
The Llanberis mountain rescue team where simply phenomenal (I will definitely be making a significant donation to them), as were the team at Bangor hospital, who are possibly are more used to this kind of injury than many hospitals. The newspaper reports of swearing that could be heard across the valley are definitely exaggerated, as even my lungs cannot drown out a helicopter!!! There may have been a bit of the Queen's best English as my ankle was reset on the mountainside!!! The whole thing was a very scary experience and not one I wish to repeat.
I'm back at home now, with quite a long path of recovery ahead. Just think twice before flying solo!!!
![]()
OK here is the image to remind you to take extra care especially if solo landscape togging, and I for one will certainly think twice before going out alone, I had known of Greg's Whitton's incident, and obviously my friend who was with me had also previously broken his ankle, but you never think these things are going to happen to you. You'll still have to wait for the landscape pictures, not sure if the X100F still works ok, its taken a bit of a beating, but this is a phone snap of the surgeon's phone copy of the X-Ray
The Llanberis mountain rescue team where simply phenomenal (I will definitely be making a significant donation to them), as were the team at Bangor hospital, who are possibly are more used to this kind of injury than many hospitals. The newspaper reports of swearing that could be heard across the valley are definitely exaggerated, as even my lungs cannot drown out a helicopter!!! There may have been a bit of the Queen's best English as my ankle was reset on the mountainside!!! The whole thing was a very scary experience and not one I wish to repeat.
I'm back at home now, with quite a long path of recovery ahead. Just think twice before flying solo!!!
![]()
What's the difference between the Pro version and the Fuji version. Is the Fuji just cut down?
There are two Fuji versions, the Pro and standard.

Yes certainly hefty compared to an X100! Seems like an absolute bargain with the grip deal, very close to pulling the trigger. Not sure which lens(es) to buy with it initially. I want some versatility, can't decide between buying two of the cheaper primes or go with the 16-55mm and save for one or two of the faster primes down the line.The X-H1 is my favourite Fuji having owned/used most of them. I prefer it to my X-T3 and the deal at the moment with the grip is nothing short of a steal but I would try and get to hold one as the difference in ergonomics and weight over the X100 series is a tad severe!
Street corner in Havana. Once you're away from the "honeypots" of Old Havana the dystopian nature if the city's neighbourhoods becomes more and more apparent.
X-E2s and 18-55mm lens
In Need Of Restoration by Aimless Alliterations, on Flickr
I have the Fuji pro version. Full version but locked to Fuji only. Not sure about stacking but have read you cannot create panno's with C1.Who here has the full Fuji version of C1?
Is this still the case with C1 20?I have the Fuji pro version. Full version but locked to Fuji only. Not sure about stacking but have read you cannot create panno's with C1.
I have the Fuji pro version. Full version but locked to Fuji only. Not sure about stacking but have read you cannot create panno's with C1.

Or buy an X-H1My lens dilemma drags on.
I‘m really not 100% sure the 16-55 is right for me. No doubt it’s a great lens, IQ-wise, build-wise etc but the lack of IBIS is killing it for me. Most of my photos are grab shots, so taken handheld. I had to bin a fair few shots from Wales a week or two back due to camera shake. (In fairness, the weather was appalling.) In hindsight, I should have waiting a couple of months and bought the, not released at the time I switched to Fuji, 16-80. The obvious thing is to sell the 16-55 to fund something else but the 16-55 seems to be endlessly discounted/cash-backed by Fuji, killing trade-in value. I could get a cheap, s/h 18-55 but it has no weather sealing. One lens I keep looking at is the 18-135. Robin Whalley (YouTube Fuji user/vlogger) rates it quite highly. I could get one grey market fairly cheaply and it would make a nice one lens solution for days when I don’t take all the camera gear out. IBIS and weather sealed as well. Thing is, if I got on with it then the, apparently optically much better, 16-55 would be redundant and be sold at a huge loss. The other thing to throw into the mix is the incoming XT4 with it‘s in-body IBIS. That would ‘fix’ the 16-55 but at the substantial cost of buying a new camera.
Hhmmmm.
![]()
Or buy an X-H1![]()
My lens dilemma drags on.
I‘m really not 100% sure the 16-55 is right for me. No doubt it’s a great lens, IQ-wise, build-wise etc but the lack of IBIS is killing it for me. Most of my photos are grab shots, so taken handheld. I had to bin a fair few shots from Wales a week or two back due to camera shake. (In fairness, the weather was appalling.) In hindsight, I should have waiting a couple of months and bought the, not released at the time I switched to Fuji, 16-80. The obvious thing is to sell the 16-55 to fund something else but the 16-55 seems to be endlessly discounted/cash-backed by Fuji, killing trade-in value. I could get a cheap, s/h 18-55 but it has no weather sealing. One lens I keep looking at is the 18-135. Robin Whalley (YouTube Fuji user/vlogger) rates it quite highly. I could get one grey market fairly cheaply and it would make a nice one lens solution for days when I don’t take all the camera gear out. IBIS and weather sealed as well. Thing is, if I got on with it then the, apparently optically much better, 16-55 would be redundant and be sold at a huge loss. The other thing to throw into the mix is the incoming XT4 with it‘s in-body IBIS. That would ‘fix’ the 16-55 but at the substantial cost of buying a new camera.
Hhmmmm.
![]()

18-135 is wrongly ignored by far too many people, i've had one when I had an XT-1 and it's a very good lens, took several thousand shots with it and was never disappointed.My lens dilemma drags on.
I‘m really not 100% sure the 16-55 is right for me. No doubt it’s a great lens, IQ-wise, build-wise etc but the lack of IBIS is killing it for me. Most of my photos are grab shots, so taken handheld. I had to bin a fair few shots from Wales a week or two back due to camera shake. (In fairness, the weather was appalling.) In hindsight, I should have waiting a couple of months and bought the, not released at the time I switched to Fuji, 16-80. The obvious thing is to sell the 16-55 to fund something else but the 16-55 seems to be endlessly discounted/cash-backed by Fuji, killing trade-in value. I could get a cheap, s/h 18-55 but it has no weather sealing. One lens I keep looking at is the 18-135. Robin Whalley (YouTube Fuji user/vlogger) rates it quite highly. I could get one grey market fairly cheaply and it would make a nice one lens solution for days when I don’t take all the camera gear out. IBIS and weather sealed as well. Thing is, if I got on with it then the, apparently optically much better, 16-55 would be redundant and be sold at a huge loss. The other thing to throw into the mix is the incoming XT4 with it‘s in-body IBIS. That would ‘fix’ the 16-55 but at the substantial cost of buying a new camera.
Hhmmmm.
![]()
Try the H1 with the 16-55 attached, it's FAR more comfortable than using it on an XT body.It did cross my mind.Tbh though, I like the XT2 - the size, weight is perfect for me.
Nice, I'd like to see a colour version of that.
My lens dilemma drags on.
I‘m really not 100% sure the 16-55 is right for me. No doubt it’s a great lens, IQ-wise, build-wise etc but the lack of IBIS is killing it for me. Most of my photos are grab shots, so taken handheld. I had to bin a fair few shots from Wales a week or two back due to camera shake. (In fairness, the weather was appalling.) In hindsight, I should have waiting a couple of months and bought the, not released at the time I switched to Fuji, 16-80. The obvious thing is to sell the 16-55 to fund something else but the 16-55 seems to be endlessly discounted/cash-backed by Fuji, killing trade-in value. I could get a cheap, s/h 18-55 but it has no weather sealing. One lens I keep looking at is the 18-135. Robin Whalley (YouTube Fuji user/vlogger) rates it quite highly. I could get one grey market fairly cheaply and it would make a nice one lens solution for days when I don’t take all the camera gear out. IBIS and weather sealed as well. Thing is, if I got on with it then the, apparently optically much better, 16-55 would be redundant and be sold at a huge loss. The other thing to throw into the mix is the incoming XT4 with it‘s in-body IBIS. That would ‘fix’ the 16-55 but at the substantial cost of buying a new camera.
Hhmmmm.
![]()
18-135 is wrongly ignored by far too many people, i've had one when I had an XT-1 and it's a very good lens, took several thousand shots with it and was never disappointed.
18-135 is wrongly ignored by far too many people, i've had one when I had an XT-1 and it's a very good lens, took several thousand shots with it and was never disappointed.
I have been tempted by the 16-55 and the cashback offers and as I have an X-H1 the lack of OIS never bothered me. But I did get the 18-135 two months ago despite the very wide range of opinions on it and have been delighted with its performance. It is a lovely lens.
But that dammed Mr Fuji sent me a £150 voucher last month which was burning a hole in my pocket so I went out to get the 16-55 and came back with the 50-140.
The 18-135 lives on and it continues to perform superbly especially today in Mid Wales where even Eric Olthwaite would have found the precipitation to be interesting.
The 16-55mm is a hell of a great lens as use to use it on my jazz shots, got rid of it though as only wanted a great set of Primes. On the X-H1 it was a cracking combo and not heavy at all.
[snip] but the 16-55 seems to be endlessly discounted/cash-backed by Fuji, killing trade-in value. [snip]