dibbly dobbler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 3,158
- Name
- Mike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Brian these are both great!
Great capture. Love the colours
I have a grip and also have it on boost mode, I've just tried it in the house and it seems OK but this afternoon and other times I've tried it it's been pretty bad. I'll have to pay attention when I got out with it next if it is always bad or starts off OK and gets worse.
Some cracking stuff in recent pages, chaps.
I've got my head around Lightroom Mobile now, which is great for my processing speed, but I'm struggling to find time to get anything properly tagged and uploaded. Here's the latest handful from Australia...
Australian Sunset by mikeriddle1984, on Flickr
I think he meant high performance mode which is different to boost mode (which is for fps). High performance mode is for AF and responsiveness and power handling etc
Just had a look at the camera. What I was referring to seems to be what you were looking at also. Boost mode under Power Management.Are you definitely talking abut the X-T2? from what I can see High Performance is now called 'Boost' mode on the X-T2..
Just had a look at the camera. What I was referring to seems to be what you were looking at also. Boost mode under Power Management.![]()
Heads up, looking to sell my immaculate/boxed XF100-400 lens in the classifieds if anyone looking one.
Cheers;
Peter
Just bought my 1st proper Fuji lens.
An XF 35mm f2.0 wr.
The kit lens just isn`t a fitting match for an X-T1
Why not? The kit lens is a great lens by all accounts. The 35 will be sharper and I do prefer primes too, but the 18-55 is perfect for the XT-1 also
To be fair I'd most likely swap my 10-24 for a 16 f/1.4 or a 23 f/1.4 given the opportunity as the primes have that 'feel' to them, but I'm too lazy![]()
The 16 1.4 looks a stunning lens, that, the 35 and the 90F2 would be my ideal trio
If I'm honest it would cope with just about all my shooting. Although 90mm might be a bit long. That's why I've got an Olympus OM 100mm on a Lensturbo.That would pretty much cover most eventualities![]()
Having had both, and currently the owner of the 35mm, I can't say its anymore or any less plastic than the 18-55. Both are very well constructed lenses.Nothing wrong with the optics at all,
Its more the overall feel of the camera and lens in union.
I used to have an X100 and I got a taste for the quality feeling metal lens
Having had both, and currently the owner of the 35mm, I can't say its anymore or any less plastic than the 18-55. Both are very well constructed lenses.
I meant the 16-50 ii kit lens, I don't know why someone mentioned the expensive 18-55, I don't own one
That makes much more sense, but the 18-55 is also a "kit lens" you didn't specify.
Sorry my mistake, yes the 16-50, whilst a good lens is not as well made as the 18-55.I meant the 16-50 ii kit lens, I don't know why someone mentioned the expensive 18-55, I don't own one
Darn that is some kit lens lol.
I did not realise, I bought a refurb X-A2 and kept the 16-50 ii and sold the body.
Ended up with the lens for £60, best bang for buck I ever got in photography gear, its excellent IQ
That's also regarded as the "kit" lens. Historically the 16-50 was THE kit lens for the X-T10, and the 18-55 for the X-T1.I meant the 16-50 ii kit lens, I don't know why someone mentioned the expensive 18-55, I don't own one
That's also regarded as the "kit" lens. Historically the 16-50 was THE kit lens for the X-T10, and the 18-55 for the X-T1.
I'm really enjoying the X-T2 however there is something that is annoying me and I'm not sure if there is a setting to improve it.
It's basically EVF lag/stuttering when panning. I have a grip and it's in boost mode but it's still not smooth, very jumpy and quite annoying.
Any ideas? as I haven't used any other mirrorless cameras like this I've no idea if it's what they are all like, I don't remember my X100T being like it but then again I probably didn't have much call for panning.