The Fabulous Fuji X owners thread

Hmm...Wex have A new X-T2 for £750 (with cashback applied) ad a trade in of £100 on top, so I could trade up my last X-T1 for £650... hmmm Should I? My current X-T2 has major lockup issues which are making it a pain in the butt for work
 
Alan Clogwyn said:
Hmm...Wex have A new X-T2 for £750 (with cashback applied) ad a trade in of £100 on top, so I could trade up my last X-T1 for £650... hmmm Should I? My current X-T2 has major lockup issues which are making it a pain in the butt for work
Click to expand...

Minus the trade in price you get for the X-T1? If you are getting lock ups with the T2 it makes it a harder choice, be nice to shoot with 2 bodies the same and the extra resolution of the T2 would be nice (well it would for me).
 
Does anyone know of a cheap dumb adaptor with a tripod mount for Canon EF to the Fuji x? I got a Samyang 135mm f2 which focuses pretty close which I fancy giving a try but want one with a tripod mount.
Found plenty without a tripod mount and rather not pay much more than £30.
 
Well I have finally got my XT-3 set up how I want it with regards to BBF and E/L, just goes to show what you can do if you give in and read the manual ;)

Here are a few snaps from this morning with the 56 1.2, superb lens. I'm hoping little one will allow me to take some when she is properly dressed!

DSCF1531 by rick phillips, on Flickr

DSCF1534 by rick phillips, on Flickr

DSCF1535 by rick phillips, on Flickr
 
Have done some more testing, I'm going to have to go back on one thing I said about the X-T2 sensor - the LR sharpening isn't entirely satisfactory. It works very well on stuff such as grass and foliage, but is not so good on surfaces with fine texture, such as stone or distressed metal.

At 1:1 viewing, even the default LR sharpening produces noticeable artefacts, and as with the X-Trans 2 sensor, I can get a better result (fine details, no artefacts) using the X-Transformer plugin (without sharpening) followed by a Smart Sharpen in PS. Zero sharpening in LR followed by Smart Sharpen in PS seems less effective.

You would have to print pretty big to see this level of detail, mind you, and it's a bit of an edge case, but if anyone is interested in this level of pixel-peeping nerdery. I can show some pictures of what I'm talking about.

This was using the 35mm f/2 prime, so it's not a case of wanting to sharpen to make up for lack of sharpness in the optics, just a matter of seeing how far it will go.
 
dave.hallett said:
Have done some more testing, I'm going to have to go back on one thing I said about the X-T2 sensor - the LR sharpening isn't entirely satisfactory. It works very well on stuff such as grass and foliage, but is not so good on surfaces with fine texture, such as stone or distressed metal.

At 1:1 viewing, even the default LR sharpening produces noticeable artefacts, and as with the X-Trans 2 sensor, I can get a better result (fine details, no artefacts) using the X-Transformer plugin (without sharpening) followed by a Smart Sharpen in PS. Zero sharpening in LR followed by Smart Sharpen in PS seems less effective.

You would have to print pretty big to see this level of detail, mind you, and it's a bit of an edge case, but if anyone is interested in this level of pixel-peeping nerdery. I can show some pictures of what I'm talking about.

This was using the 35mm f/2 prime, so it's not a case of wanting to sharpen to make up for lack of sharpness in the optics, just a matter of seeing how far it will go.
Click to expand...

So which do you prefer then David? Out of interest have you tried the Capture one Fuji edition?
 
yamahatdm900 said:
So which do you prefer then David? Out of interest have you tried the Capture one Fuji edition?
Click to expand...

I think if you're photographing those kinds of surfaces and detail matters (it doesn't always) then LR alone is not really satisfactory, although there may be better outcomes than I have managed to find (I did try the Bridgman approach, no great improvement). For some people, or in some situations, it will be enough to just turn the LR sharpening well down or completely off, and be content with the result as still pretty well resolved.

However, using the X-Transformer plugin before exporting to PS and doing the final sharpen there is a bit of a pain but gets very good results, allowing me to keep using LR as my base DAM, so that's what I'll do going forward.

I tried C1 at the end of 2015-early 2016 when I first got my X-T10 and was quite impressed with it, but wasn't sure it really offered enough to be worth the money. I think if for people who want to do all their PP in one program, it might be, but I'm very used now to starting in LR and finishing in PS, so C1 would have to offer me something very special to be worthwhile.

Speaking of software, I've been looking at FastRawViewer lately and I'm quite impressed with it as a program for quickly culling your RAW shots. It's very easy to see what is actually blown out in the RAW file and what is recoverable, and at £15 it does a few simple things very well. I'm still in the trial period, but will probably buy it.

Comparing the Rhinocam setup with a 645 75mm lens vs the same shot taken with the X-T2 and the 35mm lens is interesting, although the differences are quite subtle until you get to very large sizes. I'm beginning to see what the large format guys mean by detail without sharpness.
 
dave.hallett said:
I think if you're photographing those kinds of surfaces and detail matters (it doesn't always) then LR alone is not really satisfactory, although there may be better outcomes than I have managed to find (I did try the Bridgman approach, no great improvement). For some people, or in some situations, it will be enough to just turn the LR sharpening well down or completely off, and be content with the result as still pretty well resolved.

However, using the X-Transformer plugin before exporting to PS and doing the final sharpen there is a bit of a pain but gets very good results, allowing me to keep using LR as my base DAM, so that's what I'll do going forward.

I tried C1 at the end of 2015-early 2016 when I first got my X-T10 and was quite impressed with it, but wasn't sure it really offered enough to be worth the money. I think if for people who want to do all their PP in one program, it might be, but I'm very used now to starting in LR and finishing in PS, so C1 would have to offer me something very special to be worthwhile.

Speaking of software, I've been looking at FastRawViewer lately and I'm quite impressed with it as a program for quickly culling your RAW shots. It's very easy to see what is actually blown out in the RAW file and what is recoverable, and at £15 it does a few simple things very well. I'm still in the trial period, but will probably buy it.

Comparing the Rhinocam setup with a 645 75mm lens vs the same shot taken with the X-T2 and the 35mm lens is interesting, although the differences are quite subtle until you get to very large sizes. I'm beginning to see what the large format guys mean by detail without sharpness.
Click to expand...

I suppose it all depends how large you print in the end personally A3 is normally my maximum, funny enough the only print I got bigger than that is one from my infa red XE-1 and it's mightily 12mp.
I have been trying the free C1 Fuji edition. It's editing capabilities are somewhat curtailed but using it for raw conversion setting white and black points, highlights, shadows and film sims then exporting the Tiffs to LR/ PS and finally using LR as my dam is I think the way I'm going to go.
 
So out of curiosity, who`s using what for their workflow?

I tend to use iridient x transformer, then into acr, and ps. I did try the free c1 but didnt like it that much.
 
Paulie-W said:
So out of curiosity, who`s using what for their workflow?

I tend to use iridient x transformer, then into acr, and ps. I did try the free c1 but didnt like it that much.
Click to expand...

At the minute I'm trying the Fuji edition of C1 for raw conversion and basic adjustments then to LR or Ps and finally use LR as DAM.
 
I`ve never got on with LR (to old and set in my ways lol), I do have affinity, and quite like it, but still revert to PS
When I tried C1 against Iridient, I actually preferred Iridient for the conversion, and tweak whats needed in PS ... for me its an easy one ish click ;)

Adobe is coming in for some serious competition, and I think it`ll be interesting to see how they cope with decent competition. They can`t afford to rest on their laurels now.
 
Paulie-W said:
So out of curiosity, who`s using what for their workflow?

I tend to use iridient x transformer, then into acr, and ps. I did try the free c1 but didnt like it that much.
Click to expand...

I start in LR, set the white balance, exposure, shadows, etc. and maybe a crop if obviously needed. Then X-Transformer to a DNG. Open the DNG in PS as a Smart Object and work on it from there, generally non-destructively.

Save the result as a layered TIFF (same as a PSD) which is automatically brought back into LR. Delete the intermediary DNG as no longer needed, as it's present within the TIFF and can be easily regenerated from the RAF if needed.

Export actual image files from LR as required.

You could probably get the exact same results using Bridge and ACR, but I somewhat prefer the LR interface and its ability to organise stuff in Collections, etc. And I'm paying one price for LR + PS, so may as well use it!
 
Paulie-W said:
I`ve never got on with LR (to old and set in my ways lol), I do have affinity, and quite like it, but still revert to PS
When I tried C1 against Iridient, I actually preferred Iridient for the conversion, and tweak whats needed in PS ... for me its an easy one ish click ;)

Adobe is coming in for some serious competition, and I think it`ll be interesting to see how they cope with decent competition. They can`t afford to rest on their laurels now.
Click to expand...

They are and the competition can be only good for the consumers, always liked LR and just to use irident x- transformer and LR but at the minute the C1 route I'm using seems to fit very well for me. I'm doubtful if I will fork out for the full C1.
 
dave.hallett said:
I start in LR, set the white balance, exposure, shadows, etc. and maybe a crop if obviously needed. Then X-Transformer to a DNG. Open the DNG in PS as a Smart Object and work on it from there, generally non-destructively.

Save the result as a layered TIFF (same as a PSD) which is automatically brought back into LR. Delete the intermediary DNG as no longer needed, as it's present within the TIFF and can be easily regenerated from the RAF if needed.

Export actual image files from LR as required.

You could probably get the exact same results using Bridge and ACR, but I somewhat prefer the LR interface and its ability to organise stuff in Collections, etc. And I'm paying one price for LR + PS, so may as well use it!
Click to expand...

I do like Bridge for sure, and I guess every route is similar. I don`t know why I couldn`t get along with LR. Probably just too used to PS and ACR ;) Certain bits from other software though. I do like the On1 film sims, especially the B&W Ilford ones :thumbs:

yamahatdm900 said:
They are and the competition can be only good for the consumers, always liked LR and just to use irident x- transformer and LR but at the minute the C1 route I'm using seems to fit very well for me. I'm doubtful if I will fork out for the full C1.
Click to expand...

C1 pro is double dear, considering you have to pay for updates too. Fingers crossed Adobe will pull their finger out, and sort out all the bits that people want. Good for us either way (apart from learning curves ;))
 
Paulie-W said:
So out of curiosity, who`s using what for their workflow?

I tend to use iridient x transformer, then into acr, and ps. I did try the free c1 but didnt like it that much.
Click to expand...


I convert all RAW files to DNG regardless of what camera I'm using. I then do basic adjustments :- ie Cropping, White Balance, Black & White Points, Shadow & Highlights, Clarity If Needed, Masking, Detail, Noise Reduction, etc, etc, But No Sharpening in LR 4.4. Then open the file in PS6 (standalone) and do any further adjustments etc or convert to mono, add a bit of sharpening via unsharp mask, add my watermark via a brush I have made up, and then export as a JPG to wherever its intended to go. That's It. (y)

"Must admit I have been playing around a bit lately with Affinity both on my PC & iPad Pro with some very encouraging results"

George.
 
Out and about with the X-T2 yesterday afternoon. After this I went and tried some high ISO on the mean streets of Oxford after dark. Seemed to go fairly well, but haven't reviewed the results properly yet.

I had to push the ISO to 400 to get a 1/30 exposure here but I can't see that the quality suffered much, even viewing 1:1. X-T2 is a pleasure to use, just a few muscle memories to redo :-)


Still waters by David Hallett, on Flickr
 
The X-T2 will go to 800 with very little visible noise and to 1600 without it being a real problem (in real life rather than 100% or bigger!)
 
Couple of filters up for sale in the classifieds guys asused on my 10-24mm. Will include step up ring for use with 55-200mm if any use.
 
Paulie-W said:
So out of curiosity, who`s using what for their workflow?

I tend to use iridient x transformer, then into acr, and ps. I did try the free c1 but didnt like it that much.
Click to expand...


I knocked this up for one of the Fuji FB groups, after a number of posts defending LR.....


Workflow:

I remove the card from my camera and download the raw files to my hard drive. I import to LR, view the images in the library, mark all the ones I DON’T WANT, then remove them from the drive via LR. I then copy the remaining files to another drive as backup.


Once I have the raw files in LR, I go to work.


1. Crop & straighten if required

2. Check & set White balance

3. I generally start by using a basic preset that I designed. This preset sets Highlights to -100 & shadows to +100, bringing out the most in the available DR. I then control clipping of whites & blacks on their own controls. Sometimes I may need to move the exposure slider, but rarely. If my skies are a little too bright, I then:

4. Add a graduated filter (if required)

5. Spot removal (if required)

6. Noise control if required

7. Colour control (via the multiple sliders). I find, especially in my wildlife shots, that Fuji images really overdo the greens, so I often pull them back (and yellow) so foliage doesn’t look overdone.

8. This is where I now jump out to Photoshop, using the menu bar (select Photo, then Edit In Photoshop). I do this as I find it easier to resize, add borders and if really necessary, sharpen. Also, if I’m shooting people, I can make the eyes “pop” and work on the skin in PS.

9. So, after resizing and adding my border, I then save the finished file as JPG to a sub folder.
I may, if it’s an important image, save the file as a TIFF before resizing, etc, so I can work on a bigger file should I need to. I recently shot my friends wedding, and kept a few of my favourite shots like this so I could get them printed in a larger size.

And that’s it really. It’s not complex, but I found I did need to practice with the files a bit before I found out how to get them right.

My preset…. It isn’t anything clever, other than pushing the shadow to 100 & highlight slider to -100, adding a bit of Dehaze, Contrast and a little bit of Clarity. I saw a video of a guy using the idea of pushing the sliders on YouTube (can’t remember when or who, but it was a couple of years ago) but you MUST have a reasonably good exposure for this to work, and you then control light & dark parts of the image on the White & Black sliders.
 
Nod said:
The X-T2 will go to 800 with very little visible noise and to 1600 without it being a real problem (in real life rather than 100% or bigger!)
Click to expand...

When shooting with the 100-400 and the 1.4TC, I often find myself shooting at 1600-6400 without too much of an issue, and a bit of a tweak in LR always seems to help.

Not a particularly interesting shot (unless you like ducks), but this was at 6400 ISO

DSCF0534 by Steve Jelly, on Flickr
 
Last edited:
Jelster said:
I knocked this up for one of the Fuji FB groups, after a number of posts defending LR.....


Workflow:

I remove the card from my camera and download the raw files to my hard drive. I import to LR, view the images in the library, mark all the ones I DON’T WANT, then remove them from the drive via LR. I then copy the remaining files to another drive as backup.


Once I have the raw files in LR, I go to work.


1. Crop & straighten if required

2. Check & set White balance

3. I generally start by using a basic preset that I designed. This preset sets Highlights to -100 & shadows to +100, bringing out the most in the available DR. I then control clipping of whites & blacks on their own controls. Sometimes I may need to move the exposure slider, but rarely. If my skies are a little too bright, I then:

4. Add a graduated filter (if required)

5. Spot removal (if required)

6. Noise control if required

7. Colour control (via the multiple sliders). I find, especially in my wildlife shots, that Fuji images really overdo the greens, so I often pull them back (and yellow) so foliage doesn’t look overdone.

8. This is where I now jump out to Photoshop, using the menu bar (select Photo, then Edit In Photoshop). I do this as I find it easier to resize, add borders and if really necessary, sharpen. Also, if I’m shooting people, I can make the eyes “pop” and work on the skin in PS.

9. So, after resizing and adding my border, I then save the finished file as JPG to a sub folder.
I may, if it’s an important image, save the file as a TIFF before resizing, etc, so I can work on a bigger file should I need to. I recently shot my friends wedding, and kept a few of my favourite shots like this so I could get them printed in a larger size.

And that’s it really. It’s not complex, but I found I did need to practice with the files a bit before I found out how to get them right.

My preset…. It isn’t anything clever, other than pushing the shadow to 100 & highlight slider to -100, adding a bit of Dehaze, Contrast and a little bit of Clarity. I saw a video of a guy using the idea of pushing the sliders on YouTube (can’t remember when or who, but it was a couple of years ago) but you MUST have a reasonably good exposure for this to work, and you then control light & dark parts of the image on the White & Black sliders.
Click to expand...

Nice one Steve ... I`ll give that shadow and highlights thing a try. Always up for a different approach to things, assuming it would work the same in photoshop too ;)
 
Sunset on the Thames, yesterday afternoon.

46450517242_8d330b8c6f_b.jpg


Fujifilm XT-1, 14mm XF, 4 frame panorama
 
Paulie-W said:
Nice one Steve ... I`ll give that shadow and highlights thing a try. Always up for a different approach to things, assuming it would work the same in photoshop too ;)
Click to expand...
Highlights to -100 and Shadows to +100 then set White and Black points accordingly as a starting point is an approach Serge Ramelli has been teaching for quite some time.

I think it works well on the kinds of pictures Serge tends to take, night-time cityscapes for example. The potential problem is that you can destroy all sense of the light, not a problem for Serge who promptly puts in back again with dodge and burn or local exposure brushes, etc. He was a painter before he was a photographer, I believe, so he's good at that!

He has a lot of free tutorials on his site (and plenty of paid stuff too) if you like his style. For me, these days, it's a bit overblown. But I learned a lot from his teaching materials.
 
Carl Hall said:
Picked up a 10-24 last weekend and only got a chance to try it properly this evening. Finally starting to get to grips with the Fuji menu system now after years of using Canon!


Portland by Carl Hall, on Flickr
Click to expand...

The Blow Hole and Red Crane. Nice one Carl
 
dave.hallett said:
Highlights to -100 and Shadows to +100 then set White and Black points accordingly as a starting point is an approach Serge Ramelli has been teaching for quite some time.

I think it works well on the kinds of pictures Serge tends to take, night-time cityscapes for example. The potential problem is that you can destroy all sense of the light, not a problem for Serge who promptly puts in back again with dodge and burn or local exposure brushes, etc. He was a painter before he was a photographer, I believe, so he's good at that!

He has a lot of free tutorials on his site (and plenty of paid stuff too) if you like his style. For me, these days, it's a bit overblown. But I learned a lot from his teaching materials.
Click to expand...

Thanks Dave
I had a quick look at the free you tube stuff :thumbs:
 
dave.hallett said:
Out and about with the X-T2 yesterday afternoon. After this I went and tried some high ISO on the mean streets of Oxford after dark. Seemed to go fairly well, but haven't reviewed the results properly yet.

I had to push the ISO to 400 to get a 1/30 exposure here but I can't see that the quality suffered much, even viewing 1:1. X-T2 is a pleasure to use, just a few muscle memories to redo :)


Still waters by David Hallett, on Flickr
Click to expand...

Nice Fujigraph, well composed with good colour & detail.(y)

George.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top