The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

Wilkinson are doing the Sammy 35 f1.4 MK2 for £349 right now - if I didn't have the sigma art I'd be interested in this.

www.wilkinson.co.uk

Samyang AF 35mm F1.4 FE II - Sony FE Mount Lens

A wide-angle, autofocus, full frame, fast aperture lens for Sony Alpha mirrorless cameras. Optimised for portraits, landscapes and video. Delivering beautiful boken and an extremely narrow depth of field thanks to the F1.4 aperture, which also makes this a great lens for use in low-light.
www.wilkinson.co.uk www.wilkinson.co.uk
 
nandbytes said:
I'd say it's the opposite.

A lot of folks who compete in such places are still using DSLRs for example. Naturally that'll be canon first and Nikon 2nd.
A lot of people who will have migrated to canon mirrorless will be the ones who've always used canon lenses. They probably own expensive setups and those lenses work as well as native lens on RF bodies (unlike in the case of Sony or Nikon)

So it's not necessarily because a body or brand is technically the best. It's probably in my opinion more the case that people are using whatever they are used to or have access to. If everyone was using the technically best bodies we would be seeing pictures mostly from R1/5ii, Z8/9, A1/9 series which is not the case.
Click to expand...
Surprisingly nearly every camera was a mirrorless. The only one I actually noticed was one imaging on a 1dxiii.
I get that it won’t be a true indicator but was very surprised by the hype online that Sony is the leader while they had very few of the 100 images.
Also to be fair out of the few photographers I know I am the only Sony shooter, they are all still canon or Fuji.
 
pmac said:
Surprisingly nearly every camera was a mirrorless. The only one I actually noticed was one imaging on a 1dxiii.
I get that it won’t be a true indicator but was very surprised by the hype online that Sony is the leader while they had very few of the 100 images.
Also to be fair out of the few photographers I know I am the only Sony shooter, they are all still canon or Fuji.
Click to expand...

Sony is no leader, thats definitely Canon by a fair margin.
But going by all sales figures (which you can google up or use your fav AI chatbot), Sony is also comfortably #2 also by a fair margin.
Not that it matters (to me anyway), I bought into Sony when they were in single digit percentage on the market share fighting with Pentax for #3 spot :D
 
Last edited:
nandbytes said:
AF wise i think they both have their positives and negatives. I have only used R5 (and A1) not the latest bodies. But even going by reviews the subject tracking is still better on Sony but the Canon wins on subject recognition. the way I see it is its bit of a wash, they are both on par and better than Nikon Z8/9.
Click to expand...
From what I've seen the R5 II and R1 AF is now the best in the business, tracking better than the A1 II and A9 III. Of course we'll be splitting hairs here, but Sony no longer appear to hold the trump card, at least in terms of bodies.

I did look yesterday at what the Canon RF system had to match my Sony glass and there's no way I'd consider changing. Canon do trump my wide angle with the 14-35mm vs my 16-35mm but with everything else Sony wins imo.

20-70mm, nothing like it in the Canon range.
35mm f1.4 Sony slightly lighter but the Canon has the VCM motor which is better for video rather than stills
50mm f1.2 the Sony is considerably smaller and lighter
85mm Canon doesn't allow 3rd party
70-200mm f2.8 the GM II is better than both Canon versions
100-400mm the Canon is F8 at the long end, and the 100-500mm is heavier

pmac said:
Surprisingly nearly every camera was a mirrorless. The only one I actually noticed was one imaging on a 1dxiii.
I get that it won’t be a true indicator but was very surprised by the hype online that Sony is the leader while they had very few of the 100 images.
Also to be fair out of the few photographers I know I am the only Sony shooter, they are all still canon or Fuji.
Click to expand...
Has Sony ever had the market lead? I know they did in the mirrorless market initially but even then I think overall when including DSLR Canon still had the lion's share?
 
Last edited:
snerkler said:
From what I've seen the R5 II and R1 AF is now the best in the business, tracking better than the A1 II and A9 III. Of course we'll be splitting hairs here, but Sony no longer appear to hold the trump card, at least in terms of bodies.
Click to expand...

Here's an example i watching recently
View: https://youtu.be/ZaKFDA3zFgw?si=pcqj0eVS0sLEt4Mh

He is a staunch canon user but he concludes for fast action Sony might still have an edge.

But I agree we are splitting hairs and definitely agree that Sony no longer has the AF trump card.

They still have technically better sensors but even then the difference is small, only about half-stop

snerkler said:
I did look yesterday at what the Canon RF system had to match my Sony glass and there's no way I'd consider changing. Canon do trump my wide angle with the 14-35mm vs my 16-35mm but with everything else Sony wins imo.

20-70mm, nothing like it in the Canon range.
35mm f1.4 Sony slightly lighter but the Canon has the VCM motor which is better for video rather than stills
50mm f1.2 the Sony is considerably smaller and lighter
85mm Canon doesn't allow 3rd party
70-200mm f2.8 the GM II is better than both Canon versions
100-400mm the Canon is F8 at the long end, and the 100-500mm is heavier
Click to expand...

Lens line up is the main reason for me to stick with Sony too. Otherwise would have swapped to R5ii long back. I still think it's the best overall body on the market. Canon lens line is not great IMO.

And more recently majority of my lenses are 3rd party. I have massively simplified my line up now:
16G, 20-200mm, 35GM, Sammy 85/1.4ii, 500DN.
I can fit the 500DN in PD sling 10L, it now travels with me on holidays.

Basically the only lens I can get sensible replacement for is 35GM.

snerkler said:
Has Sony ever had the market lead? I know they did in the mirrorless market initially but even then I think overall when including DSLR Canon still had the lion's share?
Click to expand...

I don't think so. They #2 now as I was saying above.
But I'm glad it's no longer a canon-nikon duopoly.
 
We had a couple of days/nights in Whitby with dreadful weather and came home to some sunshine.

A7cII and 40mm.

Saltburn paths. This one goes somewhere.

DSC01152.jpg

This one does not.

DSC01154.jpg

Me, her and Swifty.

DSC01157.jpg

A panorama.

Untitled_Panorama-5.jpg

If you look closely you can see water falling from the cliffs.
 
Last edited:
snerkler said:
From what I've seen the R5 II and R1 AF is now the best in the business, tracking better than the A1 II and A9 III. Of course we'll be splitting hairs here, but Sony no longer appear to hold the trump card, at least in terms of bodies.

I did look yesterday at what the Canon RF system had to match my Sony glass and there's no way I'd consider changing. Canon do trump my wide angle with the 14-35mm vs my 16-35mm but with everything else Sony wins imo.

20-70mm, nothing like it in the Canon range.
35mm f1.4 Sony slightly lighter but the Canon has the VCM motor which is better for video rather than stills
50mm f1.2 the Sony is considerably smaller and lighter
85mm Canon doesn't allow 3rd party
70-200mm f2.8 the GM II is better than both Canon versions
100-400mm the Canon is F8 at the long end, and the 100-500mm is heavier


Has Sony ever had the market lead? I know they did in the mirrorless market initially but even then I think overall when including DSLR Canon still had the lion's share?
Click to expand...

It makes not a jot of difference.

Pro's ( and amateurs) were able to produce stunning images 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 years ago & on & on.

The thing is we've never had it so good.

I own a Sony A7 original (thanks @woof woof) but my main system is an Olympus EM1X and associated lenses.

Apparently no bokeh & crap for low light situations.

But I managed to take this last Tuesday night. On an "inferior" sensor.

[url=https://flic.kr/p/2rHubnf]Orion & Running Man Nebula 1 by Terence Rees, on Flickr[/URL]


For anyone interested it's an image made up of 60 30 second subs on the EM1X with OM Systems 100-400 mk2 lens @300mm. F7.1. ISO 1250. Neewer dew heater on the lens hood.

On an iOptron SkyTracker Pro and Benro aluminium tripod under Bortle 6 skies.

50 BIAS frames
50 Dark frames
50 Flat frames.

Stacked in DeepSky Stacker and processed in Photoshop 2025.


I've no doubt a Sony A74 with the 200-600mm lens would absolutely spank my setup but the extra weight would mean you'd have to shoot way less seconds exposure or you'd have to zoom out to 200mm or so to stop the stars trailing.
 
Last edited:
GreenNinja67 said:
It makes not a jot of difference.

Pro's ( and amateurs) were able to produce stunning images 5, 10, 20, 30, 40 years ago & on & on.

The thing is we've never had it so good.
Click to expand...

I think the new tech makes good results easier to get for more people, and when one shot shooting handheld too.

When the A7 came out I thought I'd be happy if it matched my Canon 5D but it crushed it. One example is the ISO performance, the 5D went to 1,600 expandable to 3,200 but even the original A7 can go much much higher and still give useable results. That means I can shoot handheld single shots in pretty much all but night time darkness. And then there are the advantages that came with mirrorless, near enough full sensor focus coverage, WYSIWYG, eye detect and all the rest.

These things might not all lead to visibly better results but for a lot of people they improve the chances of getting better results with much less effort.
 
woof woof said:
I think the new tech makes good results easier to get for more people, and when one shot shooting handheld too
Click to expand...

The new tech also makes shots readily possible that 10 years ago would have been challenging and 20 years ago highly unlikely. Eye tracking AF, on-screen focus points selection across the whole sensor, effective silent shooting, clean high ISO work. Most of us don't need more than about 25MPx for even big prints, but there's much more to these than higher resolution.

It's also important to understand that standards and expectations change, and what was once fantastic can appear unimpressive. The timing and framing might still be the same but we might now feel the kit let the photographer down. Photos, like the people that take them, are not timeless.
 
Last edited:
GreenNinja67 said:
It makes not a jot of difference.
Click to expand...
I disagree, modern tech allows us to get tack sharp shots more easily, and in some cases get some that weren't acheiveable and/or probably weren't attempted in the first place. Also, expectations are now higher than ever so where once upon a time 6 or 7 sharp shots out of 10 or a moving subject was acceptable, now we're expecting 99/100 shots to be tack sharp, not just sharp but tack sharp.

Now of course, this latter point will be down to the individual, but if you're a professional then knowing your gear is going to get you 99/100 tack sharp images eases the burden somewhat (y)

Nice image btw.
 
I think with regard to market share, there is a strong element of Canon has been #1 for so long, that anyone new who asks a bunch of friends what to get will get Canon as the majority answer - so will buy Canon, and when asked tell their friend to likewise buy Canon - so perpetuating the strong market share.
Sony was able to grab the #2 spot by virtue of having the mirrorless market to themselves for a while, and now benefits from strong 3rd party support - but that means they need to make more profit on bodies, while Canon can make profit on lens sales, and make their cameras a bit cheaper.
 
Faldrax said:
I think with regard to market share, there is a strong element of Canon has been #1 for so long, that anyone new who asks a bunch of friends what to get will get Canon as the majority answer - so will buy Canon, and when asked tell their friend to likewise buy Canon - so perpetuating the strong market share.
Sony was able to grab the #2 spot by virtue of having the mirrorless market to themselves for a while, and now benefits from strong 3rd party support - but that means they need to make more profit on bodies, while Canon can make profit on lens sales, and make their cameras a bit cheaper.
Click to expand...
I talk quite a bit about photography during my working week and it usually goes something like “what do you shoot with, Canon?”, or “I’m thinking about buying a camera, what should I get, Canon as they’re the best aren’t they?”

Occasionally it’s “what should I get, Canon or Nikon?”, it’s never been Sony. When I say that I shoot Sony the reply is usually something like “really, I thought Canon and Nikon were the best?”

Now granted it’s a small sample size but I’d almost wager my house that this is the opinion of the vast majority of non-enthusiast/pro photographers, at least in the Western World.
 
I think age could have something to do with it. A while back I'd have said that photographers were an aging group and mostly male and being aged might have grown up in the days when the choice was mostly Canon or Nikon. I remember years ago on another forum late middle aged men saying Sony should stick to making play stations, none of them thought that Canon should stick to making photocopiers and leave the future to Sony as the future was clearly electronic.

Maybe the younger generations will be more likely to consider Sony as they'll probably already own Sony products, there might well be nothing in their homes or those of their mates made by Canon or Nikon. The young vloggers seem to be willing to buy Sony. Maybe who's thought to be a serious option will balance out more over time if photography as we know it and the kit as we know it continues as it is.
 
Last edited:
Chinese lenses.

phillipreeve.net

The Best Fullframe Lenses from China - phillipreeve.net

ContentsIntroductionSome things to be aware ofUltra Wide Angle LensesLaowa 9mm 5.6Pergear 14mm 2.8 IIViltrox AF 14mm 4.0 AirLaowa 15mm 2.0Viltrox 16mm 1.8 AFSolinon 18mm 5.6 AsphWide Angle LensesLaowa 28mm 1.2 Argus7Artisans 28mm 1.4Thypoch 28mm 1.4 SimeraLaowa 35mm 0.95 ArgusViltrox AF 35mm 1.2...
phillipreeve.net phillipreeve.net

I've had four of the ones they talk about but have sold them all. I still have my Voigtlanders and about a dozen or so film era lenses.
 
It's scary how good AI is these days, I don't think anyone would question these as photos :eek:

www.facebook.com

51 тис. переглядів · 2,4 тис. реакцій | We are stories, stories written by the same light that forget us. These IMAGES aren’t photographs. I created them with a software called Midjourney. Midjourney is a tool that helps me turn my ideas into visu

We are stories, stories written by the same light that forget us. These IMAGES aren’t photographs. I created them with a software called Midjourney. Midjourney is a tool that helps me turn my...
www.facebook.com www.facebook.com
 
I've taken this picture quite a few times but I've never been happy with the light. In this one it's a bit flat. I like the composition and I keep having another go at the processing but the answer is to keep trying and finally be there at a time that there's light I'm happier with.

A7 and Sony 35mm f1.8.

1-DSC00685.jpg
 
Last edited:
On a separate note, I'm considering getting the Sony 70-200 F4 II Macro lens. It would sort of complete my F4 trilogy of 16-35 & 20-70, and at present 70mm is the longest FF lens I have for my A7RV. I see Cotswold have this for less than £1k new.

Has anyone ever had or used this lens and is able to advise if it's a nice lens. I am particularly interested as well in it's half life size macro capabilities ?
 
I'm surprised there's enough room for us all up there.

Andrew, 28mm?

Toby, 24mm?
 
Last edited:
woof woof said:
Ah. I'm slipping... I never considered a zoom lens at 27mm.
Click to expand...
I'm impressed you can tell the focal length just by looking at a shot :oops: :$ :clap:
 
Sootchucker said:
On a separate note, I'm considering getting the Sony 70-200 F4 II Macro lens. It would sort of complete my F4 trilogy of 16-35 & 20-70, and at present 70mm is the longest FF lens I have for my A7RV. I see Cotswold have this for less than £1k new.

Has anyone ever had or used this lens and is able to advise if it's a nice lens. I am particularly interested as well in it's half life size macro capabilities ?
Click to expand...

used to own the lens. Its a really nice lens and works well with the the 1.4x TC too. At macro ranges its kinda ok-ish with 2x TC but no where close to a macro lens for sharpness (but macro primes are also some of the sharpest lenses you can buy... so its a tall order for a zoom to match with TCs).
The macro capability is quite good too and deserves its "macro" rating unlike other zooms lenses that can do 1:2 macro but with a lot of field curvature.
Sony have managed to keep that flat and across the entire zoom range.

Its an incredible lens overall, just sold it for size reasons really.
My setup started with 20-70mm + 70-200G2+1.4x. then moved to 20-70mm+tamron 50-300mm. Now I just bought the sigma 20-200mm last week.

These days for me size is more important than technical perfection. It makes the difference between carrying a lens and it staying at home.
If I really need the sharpness or extra light.... I just use my prime lenses.
 
Last edited:
LeeRatters said:
One should NEVER consider zoom lenses Alan..... They are for the peasants as we well know ;) :ROFLMAO:
Click to expand...

I try but the only zooms that I use at the moment are MFT, 45-150mm and 100-400mm, but hardly ever. I tried hard with the Sony 28-60mm and that lens does have a lot going for it but in the end I prefer a prime.
 
The rumour guy seems to be getting increasingly excited about the A7V.

Sony A7V comes with new chip architecture: Less consumption, faster speed! | sonyalpharumors

I have been told the Sony A7V will have TWO hardware features that will be a first and implemented on future Alpha cameras: The already mentioned dual USB-C port (with the killing of the micro-USB port) This will be Sony’s first camera to combine the AI focusing chip with the main CPU! Benefits...
www.sonyalpharumors.com www.sonyalpharumors.com

Time will tell.
 
woof woof said:
The rumour guy seems to be getting increasingly excited about the A7V.

Sony A7V comes with new chip architecture: Less consumption, faster speed! | sonyalpharumors

I have been told the Sony A7V will have TWO hardware features that will be a first and implemented on future Alpha cameras: The already mentioned dual USB-C port (with the killing of the micro-USB port) This will be Sony’s first camera to combine the AI focusing chip with the main CPU! Benefits...
www.sonyalpharumors.com www.sonyalpharumors.com

Time will tell.
Click to expand...
It sounds quite a decent upgrade over the A7 IV, howeer the question is the price compared to the competitors as discussed this weekend.
 
snerkler said:
It sounds quite a decent upgrade over the A7 IV, howeer the question is the price compared to the competitors as discussed this weekend.
Click to expand...

If I was Mr Sony I'd make an A7cIII with one extra custom button, a do it all tilt and swivel screen and if I couldn't do a mechanical shutter that goes to 1/8,000 I'd at least provide an option to automatically switch from mechanical to electronic to enable shutter speeds above 1/4,000. In fact they should give an auto function as a part of a firmware upgrade for existing owners.

That's all I want and Sony should make it. Just for me :D
 
woof woof said:
If I was Mr Sony I'd make an A7cIII with one extra custom button, a do it all tilt and swivel screen and if I couldn't do a mechanical shutter that goes to 1/8,000 I'd at least provide an option to automatically switch from mechanical to electronic to enable shutter speeds above 1/4,000. In fact they should give an auto function as a part of a firmware upgrade for existing owners.

That's all I want and Sony should make it. Just for me :D
Click to expand...
yea but you won't buy it for another 10 years even if they made is today :P
 
Full specs leaked.

Fully leaked Sony A7V specs!!! | sonyalpharumors

Sony A7V at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, Fotokoch, Foto Erhardt, Calumet, WexUK, Clifton, Park UK, Henrys, Camera Pro, Sony Australia. This is the google translated press text: The Sony Alpha 7 V full-frame mirrorless camera combines professional-grade speed and performance in a compact body...
www.sonyalpharumors.com www.sonyalpharumors.com

Who's tempted?
 

Fully leaked Sony A7V specs!!! | sonyalpharumors

Sony A7V at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, Fotokoch, Foto Erhardt, Calumet, WexUK, Clifton, Park UK, Henrys, Camera Pro, Sony Australia. This is the google translated press text: The Sony Alpha 7 V full-frame mirrorless camera combines professional-grade speed and performance in a compact body...
www.sonyalpharumors.com www.sonyalpharumors.com

super 35 crop in 4k 120 and 10bit only at 30fps and in video.
DOA on the video side compared to the competition
 
Last edited:
pmac said:

Fully leaked Sony A7V specs!!! | sonyalpharumors

Sony A7V at BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, Fotokoch, Foto Erhardt, Calumet, WexUK, Clifton, Park UK, Henrys, Camera Pro, Sony Australia. This is the google translated press text: The Sony Alpha 7 V full-frame mirrorless camera combines professional-grade speed and performance in a compact body...
www.sonyalpharumors.com www.sonyalpharumors.com

super 35 crop in 4k 120 and 10bit only at 30fps and in video.
DOA on the video side compared to the competition
Click to expand...

Good.

I couldn't care less about video specs as it's never been something I use and would rather not pay for them.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top