The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

robj20 said:
The annoying thing is dust in lenses doesn't even make a difference to photos.
Click to expand...
As mentioned ruins the resale value
Though if you don't plan on selling for a while it's not an issue.
I'm sure there's plenty of dust in mine, I've had since release
 
A picture taken with 35GM

f/5.6, 1/6s, ISO100
54881342491_5a08946a18_b.jpg
 
nandbytes said:
As mentioned ruins the resale value
Though if you don't plan on selling for a while it's not an issue.
I'm sure there's plenty of dust in mine, I've had since release
Click to expand...
That's the dilemma, hassle of returning Vs just accepting it. If it was properly faulty that would be different.
I'll have a think about it, can't see me getting rid of this for a long time.
 
robj20 said:
Id have expected Sony GM lenses to not have something like this wrong with them. Normally dust doesn't really bother me but this seems excessive for brand new.

View attachment 466598
Click to expand...

robj20 said:
The annoying thing is dust in lenses doesn't even make a difference to photos.
Click to expand...
That's poor, I've never had anything like this with any Sony lens let alone a GM one. I know Anand has said they've experienced it but I wouldn't be happy. I'd personally return it as I know it'd bug me dven though it wouldn't affect images.
 
nandbytes said:
A picture taken with 35GM

f/5.6, 1/6s, ISO100
54881342491_5a08946a18_b.jpg
Click to expand...
Nice picture, although the sky/clouds look as though excessive dehaze has been applied, unless it's just the rendering on here?
 
SAR are predicting a 100-400mm f4 which sounds very interesting indeed, although I’d expect it to be heavy and expensive.
 
snerkler said:
Nice picture, although the sky/clouds look as though excessive dehaze has been applied, unless it's just the rendering on here?
Click to expand...

I don't often use dehaze. I have slightly with this one purely because it was constantly raining
Thanks for feedback I'll work on it again :)
 
nandbytes said:
I don't often use dehaze. I have slightly with this one purely because it was constantly raining
Thanks for feedback I'll work on it again :)
Click to expand...
I only noticed it because I've been guilty of it in the past :exit: It's a lovely photo though (y)
 
snerkler said:
That's poor, I've never had anything like this with any Sony lens let alone a GM one. I know Anand has said they've experienced it but I wouldn't be happy. I'd personally return it as I know it'd bug me dven though it wouldn't affect images.
Click to expand...

You have been lucky it’s not uncommon with GM lenses at all.
 
snerkler said:
That's poor, I've never had anything like this with any Sony lens let alone a GM one. I know Anand has said they've experienced it but I wouldn't be happy. I'd personally return it as I know it'd bug me dven though it wouldn't affect images.
Click to expand...
It doesn't really bug me from a performance point of view, purely that it's new.
But then where I work that wouldn't be classed as an issue and a customer couldn't return it for that.
Considering I only paid £800 which is less than second hand from the likes of MPB I might just crack on.
 
robj20 said:
It doesn't really bug me from a performance point of view, purely that it's new.
But then where I work that wouldn't be classed as an issue and a customer couldn't return it for that.
Considering I only paid £800 which is less than second hand from the likes of MPB I might just crack on.
Click to expand...
By the way the dust moves around too.
It might not even be visible eventually unless you go looking for it with a torch :D
 
For anyone that has these bodies...

New camera software on α1 II (ver. 4.0) and α9 III (ver. 4.0) | sonyalpharumors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AlYZsWpqQk Sony issued two major firmware updates for these cameras: Sony A1II benefits and improvements (BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, Fotokoch, Foto Erhardt, Calumet, WexUK) Adds support for Real-time Recognition AF+ with improved subject detection and tracking...
www.sonyalpharumors.com www.sonyalpharumors.com
 
Sootchucker said:
For anyone that has these bodies...

New camera software on α1 II (ver. 4.0) and α9 III (ver. 4.0) | sonyalpharumors

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AlYZsWpqQk Sony issued two major firmware updates for these cameras: Sony A1II benefits and improvements (BHphoto, Amazon, Adorama, Fotokoch, Foto Erhardt, Calumet, WexUK) Adds support for Real-time Recognition AF+ with improved subject detection and tracking...
www.sonyalpharumors.com www.sonyalpharumors.com
Click to expand...


Seen that wonder how much better the newer Real time a.f recognition will be.

The films style presets for picture profiles seems a bit of a gimmick as there won't be many people using an A9III or A1 II shooting jpeg regularly unless for sports and wildlife they won't be using film presets.

Wish they could allow the option to upload your own presets that is something I could get on board with. Sony rep says it will never happen as could be a way in for third parties to access and change camera firmware.
 
I still wish you could display the horizontal horizon and Histogram at the same time though.

I must admit though a little jealous that my A7RV doesn't have this rotatable information in portrait mode as I find it really useful (all my Nikon's Z's do except the much older Z7 II).
 
T_J_G said:
Any one using the 16-25 G lens? Considering picking one up for wider situations, especially dance floor at weddings?
Click to expand...

I personally dont have it but perhaps also consider the samyang 14-24mm f2.8
sonyalpha.blog

Sony Alpha Blog : Samyang 14-24mm F2.8 (Schneider – Kreuznach)

The Samyang 14-24mm F2.8 lens is a compact and lightweight ultra-wide zoom, known for excellent sharpness, good autofocus, and pleasing bokeh. Priced at 1200 euros, it outperforms competitors in si…
sonyalpha.blog sonyalpha.blog

Fair bit wider and cheaper and most reviews are very positive.

I use 16mm f1.8 G myself which is better for me in low light. If needed I don't mind cropping to 24mm since i shoot on A7RV
 
Last edited:
T_J_G said:
Any one using the 16-25 G lens? Considering picking one up for wider situations, especially dance floor at weddings?
Click to expand...
I looked at that but ended up getting the 12-24 f/2.8 considering ditching it for the Samyang 14-24 just because it so small it’s also supposed to be very good. But it’s hard to give up 12mm.

If I was buying again I would definitely get the Samyang. The extra 2mm on the wide end makes a huge difference. The difference between 16mm and 14mm is massive.

If you think 16mm is wide enough get the Viltrox instead.
 
Last edited:
Thanks @f/2.8 & @nandbytes

I hadn't even considered third party options (bad experiences with Sigma...), I think 14/16mm is definitely wide enough, it's not often I need more than my 24mm but it's a useful option to have.

I'll have a look into it, f2.8 not really an issue as will be daylight wide shots or artificially lit dance floors where I want more DOF.
 
T_J_G said:
Thanks @f/2.8 & @nandbytes

I hadn't even considered third party options (bad experiences with Sigma...), I think 14/16mm is definitely wide enough, it's not often I need more than my 24mm but it's a useful option to have.

I'll have a look into it, f2.8 not really an issue as will be daylight wide shots or artificially lit dance floors where I want more DOF.
Click to expand...

I tried two copies of sigma 14-24mm f2.8, both decentered, second copy was worst than the first. I just gave up on it.

If you don't need a fast aperture you could even consider Sony 16-35 f4 G.

Sometimes I wonder if 3rd parties are bad or if it's just bad luck. I mostly had good experience with other sigma and samyang lenses.
 
Toby...

How did you get on with the X100 v RX1? Decided which to keep and which to sell yet?

Sorry if this has already been covered and I missed it.
 
nandbytes said:
I tried two copies of sigma 14-24mm f2.8, both decentered, second copy was worst than the first. I just gave up on it.

If you don't need a fast aperture you could even consider Sony 16-35 f4 G.

Sometimes I wonder if 3rd parties are bad or if it's just bad luck. I mostly had good experience with other sigma and samyang lenses.
Click to expand...

More the fact that the Sigmas I have had 35/85 Art look proper beaten up after a year of use, whereas my 24GM I bought at the same time still looks really good.

I’ll look into the f4, that’s a good shout.
 
SAR doesn't make for particularly good reading on the A9III, I hope it doesn't put Sony off filtering global shutters down to the other future bodies.

"Despite the initial hype around its global shutter, sales haven’t met expectations. This seems to be due to the camera’s more niche appeal. While users within that niche appear satisfied, little positive feedback has made its way back to retail channels. Concerns around low-light performance are discouraging potential buyers, and many opt for the a1 II instead. In short, the a9 III is not selling particularly well"
 
woof woof said:
Toby...

How did you get on with the X100 v RX1? Decided which to keep and which to sell yet?

Sorry if this has already been covered and I missed it.
Click to expand...
I really liked the X100VI, and there were some things I liked about it more than the RX1R II, mainly the speed of operation, the RX1R is really slow with things like menus and reviewing images etc. However, as pleasing as the images are from the Fuji I just liked the Sony ones better. I struggled to put my finger on exactly what it was, but they just look that little more high quality, there's possibly a little more depth too.

As a result I've opted to keep the Sony (y)
 
snerkler said:
I really liked the X100VI, and there were some things I liked about it more than the RX1R II, mainly the speed of operation, the RX1R is really slow with things like menus and reviewing images etc. However, as pleasing as the images are from the Fuji I just liked the Sony ones better. I struggled to put my finger on exactly what it was, but they just look that little more high quality, there's possibly a little more depth too.

As a result I've opted to keep the Sony (y)
Click to expand...

Thanks for the update :D

I originally bought an S but it was faulty so I replaced it with an F. I liked the size and retro controls and the EVF but the rest just didn't meet my expectations and I usually chose something else over them. Later X100's may be better. Just had a look in my favourites folder, 7 X100s pictures made it in and 2 F's so it wasn't a wasted process and I did have fun trying them. I think maybe the main appeal for some is the jpeg film simulations and maybe the look of the camera.

Good luck with the Sony. I think the A7cII has cured my RX1 gas for now. I think the cII IQ is better than the lovely old A7 and the raws seem to look better sooc and that's nice as I never do a lot of processing. RAW colour and overall IQ seems to have moved on. I sold my A7, GX9 and TZ100, kept the A7cII, A7III and GX80.

I been laid up for 3 weeks with flu or possibly covid so have been watching a lot of Youtube and I don't know why but I've been bombarded with X100 and also Nikon vids, maybe someone is tweaking the algorithm to pump them. This made me think about trying an S or F again but in reality I know I'd choose a Sony or the GX80 over it again.
 
Last edited:
snerkler said:
I really liked the X100VI, and there were some things I liked about it more than the RX1R II, mainly the speed of operation, the RX1R is really slow with things like menus and reviewing images etc. However, as pleasing as the images are from the Fuji I just liked the Sony ones better. I struggled to put my finger on exactly what it was, but they just look that little more high quality, there's possibly a little more depth too.

As a result I've opted to keep the Sony (y)
Click to expand...

woof woof said:
Thanks for the update :D

I originally bought an S but it was faulty so I replaced it with an F. I liked the size and retro controls and the EVF but the rest just didn't meet my expectations and I usually chose something else over them. Later X100's may be better. Just had a look in my favourites folder, 7 X100s pictures made it in and 2 F's so it wasn't a wasted process and I did have fun trying them. I think maybe the main appeal for some is the jpeg film simulations and maybe the look of the camera.

Good luck with the Sony. I think the A7cII has cured my RX1 gas for now. I think the cII IQ is better than the lovely old A7 and the raws seem to look better sooc and that's nice as I never do a lot of processing. RAW colour and overall IQ seems to have moved on. I sold my A7, GX9 and TZ100, kept the A7cII, A7III and GX80.

I been laid up for 3 weeks with flu or possibly covid so have been watching a lot of Youtube and I don't know why but I've been bombarded with X100 and also Nikon vids, maybe someone is tweaking the algorithm to pump them. This made me think about trying an S or F again but in reality I know I'd choose a Sony or the GX80 over it again.
Click to expand...

Horses for courses isn't it? :)

Some people will always go for IQ & big apertures/separation/the look over everything else. I know that, I've been there & sometime I still am!

For me, I don't generally worry about the X100f IQ - for what I use it for, I love the actual experience of and time spent using it. And that, in a way, beats the IQ of the A7Riii. Obviously, the Sony kit wins for dedicated photography - the recent Snowdonia trip for example, there's no way I was shooting some of those big, honeypot locations at 6400ISO on the X100f ;) Same if it was really special moments/places. But today we popped into Bath, for a wander around & a bit of shopping for the wife & some street photography for me - I shot 90% in manual focus on the X100f & got over 15,000 steps in :) I wouldn't be doing that street photography on the A7Riii/35GM, so I wouldn't have had so much fun, I wouldn't have stayed there so long, I wouldn't have seen so much and I wouldn't have done so many steps... ;)

I guess I'm fairly lucky in that I have a reasonably nice selection of gear to use for different situations.
 
snerkler said:
SAR doesn't make for particularly good reading on the A9III, I hope it doesn't put Sony off filtering global shutters down to the other future bodies.

"Despite the initial hype around its global shutter, sales haven’t met expectations. This seems to be due to the camera’s more niche appeal. While users within that niche appear satisfied, little positive feedback has made its way back to retail channels. Concerns around low-light performance are discouraging potential buyers, and many opt for the a1 II instead. In short, the a9 III is not selling particularly well"
Click to expand...

Yeah I seen that tbh I was surprised A9III users seem very happy with the camera, there is very little negativity around it in any of the user groups and they tend to be more positive than any other user groups I have seen. I absolutely love mine its far and away the best camera body I have used.

I guess it depends what is most important to you, for people like me that want best in class a.f and fast operation the A9III is perfect. As an added bonus personally I prefer the ergonomics over any other Sony body I have used and the colours from the camera are insanely good. I am very happy with mine, my mate has a couple as well and absolutely loves them having switched from A1's. Being able to shoot in all lighting conditions without having to worry about banding and rolling shutter distortion is another huge advantage for weddings. The insane flash sync speeds are very useful as well.

It is an expensive body though and many people will just look at headline specs like resolution and prefer the A1 II. For me personally I have found low light performance very good certainly better in real life situations than my A9 and A9II. I don't crop a lot at all and have always tried to get everything right in camera so the higher file sizes of the A1 and R series cameras are of no real benefit and just slow my workflow down. Because of volume of images 24-36mpx cameras are the sweet spot for weddings at the moment.

It was never going to be a camera that was bought by the masses and I can see why many would prefer the A1 II. The A9III does have a lot of tech I don't need like the ridiculous fps but there isn't another body that also has the advantages it provides me either.

Off course I wish it was cheaper, if it was I would happily upgrade all of our other bodies. There isn't too many wedding photographers shooting Sony using them, they mostly gravitate towards the A74 because of cost and while we have 3 of them I hate using that body. While others will go For the A1 II or A7RV because they feel they need the extra resolution.

It is funny really pretty much all wedding photographers now use online galleries to deliver images. When you upload to the online galleries they vastly reduce the file sizes that are delivered to clients especially if you are using higher res bodies and many wedding photographers don't even realise that is how it works. They have chosen high res bodies to try and give as high a res as possible to clients who are then downloading images that have been heavily reduced in file size and then mostly only looking at them on their phones. :D
 
Last edited:
LeeRatters said:
Horses for courses isn't it? :)
Click to expand...

The thing is that I couldn't see a use for the X100s/f. If the focus and DR had been better then maybe it could have replaced the GX80 whilst I still had the now sold GX9 and that was the plan but for me apart from the controls and the want one factor which the Fuji X100 range definitely has the GX80 is the better camera and as IMO none of these cameras are really pocketable and need to be in a bag I might as well use the A7cII. As always good luck to those who like the X100 and I see the appeal and I'm glad mine went to a good home :D I'm keeping the GX80 as with the 14mm f2.5 it's a compact social use camera with a built in tiltable flash and having it means I don't have to use my phone plus I do occasionally use the 45-150mm and 100-400mm and I can't see myself buying FF compatible lenses to cover those lengths.

I do see appeal beyond IQ but I get that more from lenses than cameras and especially from MF lenses and even MF-ing with AF lenses and sadly this is another area in which the X100 cameras I had disappointed me. Glad you seem to be getting on with it but I found it very poor.

My ideal would be an A7cIII with a tilting and articulating screen and a mechanical shutter going to at least 1/8,000 or at least automatic switching between mechanical and electronic shutters or a faster readout to cut the rolling shutter effect to make the electronic shutter more of an every use thing. If I could have that I'd get back to only having two cameras, the A7cx for just about everything outdoors and the GX80 for more discrete social and flash use.

Has this been posted? Sorry if it has... "An excellent all around travel lens." More like it on the way? Tamron 25-200mm f2.8-5.6.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j3iXCOQ9mwk
 
Last edited:
Bungieben said:
Pippa free in an enclosed area yesterday she's ruddy quick but does make me giggle as she seems to make a circuit for herself and turns on a dime doing laps
Click to expand...

Those are lovely :D The world needs dog pictures :D
 
woof woof said:
The thing is that I couldn't see a use for the X100s/f.
Click to expand...

General days out, beach walks, dog walks, street photography, casual parties, bbq's & events, car breakfast meets.... Almost every use except dedicated photography where photography is the whole reason of going out ;)

Yesterday - Bath, general walkabout for some autumn colour, shopping & street - X100f
This morning - Woodland for autumn colour at sunrise - A7Riii, CV40/1.2E & Tamron 70-180/2.8 ;)

M43 does appear to be a popular system, and I fully get the long zoom/wildlife benefits of it, but it's not for me.

But, yes indeed..... Anything that means we don't have to use the phone for sure!! :)
 
robj20 said:
I always used to be one of those that would crank Clarity to the max, but these days I like a bit of negative clarity, especially on those sunrise misty mornings.
Click to expand...

I don't think I ever touch the clarity slider. Not sure if that's a good or a bad thing to say :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top