The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

Try upping your shutter speeds to rule out motion blur 1/500 is on the low side
Thanks for the suggestion but I think there must be more to it than that - I shoot at 1/500th on my RX10iv all the time and it’s generally fine for birds on a perch (eg I got a whole lot of sharp shots today with that shutter speed with the RX10). Cheers
 
Thanks for the suggestion but I think there must be more to it than that - I shoot at 1/500th on my RX10iv all the time and it’s generally fine for birds on a perch (eg I got a whole lot of sharp shots today with that shutter speed with the RX10). Cheers
Whilst I don't think this is your problem, things like motion blur due to slow shutter speeds often are more noticeable on larger and/or higher res sensors.
 
I think with modern day sensors having the ability to crop like they do it could quite easily replace a 70-200mm, but not at £4k and not if it weighs 1.3kg+ for me. That’s one thing I love about the Sony 70-200mm GM II, it’s ‘only’ a touch over a kilo
Already seen a few posts from wedding photographers who really want this new lens.

Those that are now using the 28-70 f/2 seem very interested in it.

I don’t get it tbh. They want zooms to save carrying around multiple lenses but these zooms are much heavier. :ROFLMAO:
 
I think with modern day sensors having the ability to crop like they do it could quite easily replace a 70-200mm, but not at £4k and not if it weighs 1.3kg+ for me. That’s one thing I love about the Sony 70-200mm GM II, it’s ‘only’ a touch over a kilo
I have a 100-400 which is quite light and I find that Focal length more useful.

I use to be a fan of the 70-200 but I find the short end, not short enough and the long end not long enough if that makes sense?

Basically whenever I need to shoot above 100, 200 is not enough reach for my subject.

I also do have a 400mm 2.8 lens that I use specifically for sports.

The 100-400 is light enough to bring as a travel lens abroad!
 
I have a 100-400 which is quite light and I find that Focal length more useful.

I use to be a fan of the 70-200 but I find the short end, not short enough and the long end not long enough if that makes sense?

Basically whenever I need to shoot above 100, 200 is not enough reach for my subject.

I also do have a 400mm 2.8 lens that I use specifically for sports.

The 100-400 is light enough to bring as a travel lens abroad!
I used to find the 100-400mm light enough to take everywhere but as my fibro gets worse it's becomming more and more of a chore and I like to keep weight down as much as possible.
 
I don’t get it tbh. They want zooms to save carrying around multiple lenses but these zooms are much heavier. :ROFLMAO:
I think it depends on whether a prime lens or a zoom is more to your liking.

As I've mentioned before, my two A65s usually wear a Sigma 10~20mm and a Tamron 16~300mm, which gives me a lot of options from seriously wide to very long, in a relatively compact outfit...

Bottom deck Exmouth bus 10mm superwide A65 DSC03746.JPG
BAE 146 over Exeter A65 DSC02321.JPG
 
I am typically shooting events that are a couple of hours or so. I will swap weight for light in most cases. I got the 28-70 F2 recently and for Gigs I will have that on a gripped A9iii, a gripped A1 and a 70-200mm F2.8 and an A1 with 14mm F1.8. Gripped bodies on a dual harness and 14mm around my neck. For the 15-20 minutes I need them the convenience is worth it. For events that last a couple of hours I usually keep the 14mm or ultrawide zoom in a pocket or bag and carry just two bodies. 4K is a massive amount to spend though and I doubt I will be an early adopter. If it comes down to around 2.5K I may well be tempted. A second A9iii is on the cards first though as the A1iis will be a long time before they drop in price a bit. I'll have an A7Riii for sale soon to help with the A9iii purchase
 
I am typically shooting events that are a couple of hours or so. I will swap weight for light in most cases. I got the 28-70 F2 recently and for Gigs I will have that on a gripped A9iii, a gripped A1 and a 70-200mm F2.8 and an A1 with 14mm F1.8. Gripped bodies on a dual harness and 14mm around my neck. For the 15-20 minutes I need them the convenience is worth it. For events that last a couple of hours I usually keep the 14mm or ultrawide zoom in a pocket or bag and carry just two bodies. 4K is a massive amount to spend though and I doubt I will be an early adopter. If it comes down to around 2.5K I may well be tempted. A second A9iii is on the cards first though as the A1iis will be a long time before they drop in price a bit. I'll have an A7Riii for sale soon to help with the A9iii purchase
I haven’t needed or wanted to use a grip since Jesus was a wee lad. Can do a wedding up to the speeches on one battery so a grip is pointless for me.
 
I haven’t needed or wanted to use a grip since Jesus was a wee lad. Can do a wedding up to the speeches on one battery so a grip is pointless for me.
I don’t like grips as I prefer to wrap my little finger under the body, feels more secure to me too. I don’t find it any hardship turning the camera 90 degrees to shoot portrait orientation.
 
Other than the Sony GM, Sigma DG and Sony G lenses, what other options are there for a fast 24/35 prime lens for full frame have I got?
 
Other than the Sony GM, Sigma DG and Sony G lenses, what other options are there for a fast 24/35 prime lens for full frame have I got?
Samyang, then Zeiss and Loawa if you want MF.
 
Other than the Sony GM, Sigma DG and Sony G lenses, what other options are there for a fast 24/35 prime lens for full frame have I got?

 

That link is brilliant, thank you. Never seen it before but it’ll be very handy. :)
 
Ideally 1.4 but happy to use 1.8 too.
I'm surprised not many refer to dyxum instead refer to review sites with incomplete info on all the options


You don't need to be part of the forum to use the database.

It's a database of all the lens for both Sony a-mount and e-mount
You can filter based on primes, zooms, focal lengths, aperture etc

Anyway AFAIK, you can use link above to dig into all options
24mm f1.4 - Sony and Sigma
24mm f1.8 - Samyang, viltrox
24mm f2 - sigma, zeiss (though this is a 25mm)

35mm f1.4 - Sony, sigma, Samyang
35mm f1.8 - Samyang, Sony
35mm f2 - sigma
 
Viltrox have a 35mm 1.2 coming out in the next few weeks for Sony and Nikon.
 
I'm surprised not many refer to dyxum instead refer to review sites with incomplete info on all the options


You don't need to be part of the forum to use the database.

It's a database of all the lens for both Sony a-mount and e-mount
You can filter based on primes, zooms, focal lengths, aperture etc

Anyway AFAIK, you can use link above to dig into all options
24mm f1.4 - Sony and Sigma
24mm f1.8 - Samyang, viltrox
24mm f2 - sigma, zeiss (though this is a 25mm)

35mm f1.4 - Sony, sigma, Samyang
35mm f1.8 - Samyang, Sony
35mm f2 - sigma
It’s useful but it’s not as ‘clean’ and easy to follow as the others imo. YMMV (y)
 
I'm surprised not many refer to dyxum instead refer to review sites with incomplete info on all the options


You don't need to be part of the forum to use the database.

It's a database of all the lens for both Sony a-mount and e-mount
You can filter based on primes, zooms, focal lengths, aperture etc

Anyway AFAIK, you can use link above to dig into all options
24mm f1.4 - Sony and Sigma
24mm f1.8 - Samyang, viltrox
24mm f2 - sigma, zeiss (though this is a 25mm)

35mm f1.4 - Sony, sigma, Samyang
35mm f1.8 - Samyang, Sony
35mm f2 - sigma
Thank you, another website I was not aware of so much appreciated. :)
 
If you want f/1.4 then just get the GM's and be done with it.

f/1.8 or 2 will give you more options.
I’ve just been looking at the 24GM, I can get it used for £649 but without the accessories, sadly I’ve not had much time to plan the trip otherwise I’d have ordered grey market and got the 35GM.
 
I’ve just been looking at the 24GM, I can get it used for £649 but without the accessories, sadly I’ve not had much time to plan the trip otherwise I’d have ordered grey market and got the 35GM.
There is a school of thought that buying from WEX and returning it might work…
 
I’ve just been looking at the 24GM, I can get it used for £649 but without the accessories, sadly I’ve not had much time to plan the trip otherwise I’d have ordered grey market and got the 35GM.

You could buy used? Might get next day delivery. Then if you sell it on your return it's much like renting :)

Personally I prefer the 35GM, but if you've got an R body or decent resolution (or don't mind lower resolution) get the 24GM and shoot in APSC for both focal lengths.
 
You could buy used? Might get next day delivery. Then if you sell it on your return it's much like renting :)

Personally I prefer the 35GM, but if you've got an R body or decent resolution (or don't mind lower resolution) get the 24GM and shoot in APSC for both focal lengths.
I’m taking the Sony A7R iiia and the wife is taking the Canon R5 so not sure I’ll use the crop mode but I’m leaning towards the 35GM as for the same price it’ll cost me for something else, I can pick up the 35 for similar money used. :)
 
I’m taking the Sony A7R iiia and the wife is taking the Canon R5 so not sure I’ll use the crop mode but I’m leaning towards the 35GM as for the same price it’ll cost me for something else, I can pick up the 35 for similar money used. :)
35mm GM is a lovely lens, there's something extra special how it renders.
 
I’m taking the Sony A7R iiia and the wife is taking the Canon R5 so not sure I’ll use the crop mode but I’m leaning towards the 35GM as for the same price it’ll cost me for something else, I can pick up the 35 for similar money used. :)
If you decide to get a 24mm I have one couple of months old with box etc from Panamoz, Will put in classified if interested at £715 with RMSD
 
I’m taking the Sony A7R iiia and the wife is taking the Canon R5 so not sure I’ll use the crop mode but I’m leaning towards the 35GM as for the same price it’ll cost me for something else, I can pick up the 35 for similar money used. :)

35GM is excellent it has warmer rendering than the other G.M lenses but that’s the only downside really.

It’s the best 35 you can buy at the moment well until the new Viltrox launches anyway.
 
Hi all, I am jumping into this thread now as I am just about to take delivery of a A7R V and 50mm 1.4 GM (Gray Import). I will be looking to add other lenses soon, thinking of Sony 20mm 1.8, 35mm 1.4 GM and 85mm GM II
 
O wow ok lol.

Anyways my cake should hopefully be ready by next week
Not sure what that means, unless you mean an actual cake? :lol:

Have you got your A1 back yet?
 
An update on my A7III saving to a new folder every day.

Sony sent me a list of things to try including checking various menu settings, resetting the camera, taking the battery out etc none of which worked.

Just to be sure there was nothing lens related, although I can't really see how, I thought I'd try a different lens but that didn't make any difference either.

I've replied to Sony and I'll wait for their reply but I think this is going to end in sending it in for repair.
 
I’m taking the Sony A7R iiia and the wife is taking the Canon R5 so not sure I’ll use the crop mode but I’m leaning towards the 35GM as for the same price it’ll cost me for something else, I can pick up the 35 for similar money used. :)

As I said, imo the 35GM is the better all round lens. If I need wider I just shoot a panorama. I have the Riii myself, I don't use crop mode but I'm sure it'll still give enough pixels :)

24GM equals 24mm and 35mm

35GM equals 35mm and 50mm

Ish......
 
As I said, imo the 35GM is the better all round lens. If I need wider I just shoot a panorama. I have the Riii myself, I don't use crop mode but I'm sure it'll still give enough pixels :)

24GM equals 24mm and 35mm

35GM equals 35mm and 50mm

Ish......
Out of interest do you find shooting panos with the 35mm you get an parallax effect? I’ve only done panos shooting with a wide angle and the parallax effect is a PITA.
 
Out of interest do you find shooting panos with the 35mm you get an parallax effect? I’ve only done panos shooting with a wide angle and the parallax effect is a PITA.

AFAIK parallax could be an issue with any focal length.
 
Back
Top