snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Well when you consider the Sony 50mm f1.2 is 778g and Nikon's is 1090g and the size of a house I feel that Nikon's concern is not weight or size. That would be fine if the optical quality was hugely superior but I've not seen anything that suggests this. I know when the Z-mount was created everyone lorded the mount size saying it'll allow fast lenses with superior quality but I feel that Sony have shown that you can do that without the huge mount and therefore it could be that the size of the Nikon mount is more of a negativeI often think about “how big is too big?” For lenses.
It’s a trade off with the lens’ utility, and competition, but still. That sounds heavy but I have heavier…
Though at a certain point I may as well carry a medium format?










