The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

May be a good move as the cost of change wouldn't be that big. I've managed to get both my A9ii for a smidge over £2k, so then it didn't make sense to go A7IV (unless you need video specs)
The electronic shutter, and buffer are just game changing with regards what you can capture when you are an opportunistic photographer. I love getting moments that last a split second, you just have more precision and speed over what you can capture with the capabilities of the A7iv
 
Last edited:
Interesting observation and nice to hear it away from the YouTubers. Your experience does back up the Z8/9 are still behind Sony and Nikon (slightly) on the AF. No doubt Nikon will continue to tweak the firmware.

Having had my wobble with the A1 I’m firmly keeping hold of mine. I have been out sports and BIF and I am always impressed the number of shots in focus I come away with. When they aren’t it’s mostly operator error!!

Always room for improvement - but I feel the losing focus on background is less of an issue. Is having more AF options a good thing or more confusing?!

My issue is the potential churn with Sony that they switch body more often. But saying that the A1 is way more camera than I need. And will keep me happy until the A1 mk2 is 12 months old and the grey prices mean it will be affordable for an upgrade.

Chatting with a mate who has the Z9 and reading the reviews you need to have multiple AF set ups to cater for different scenarios. My mate came from the D6 and it’s taken him 6-9 months to get used to the Z9 and he’s an experienced wildlife photographer. Speaks volumes to vme.
After seeing the launch specs of the Nikon Z8 I ordered one with a view to moving back to Nikon for my telephoto usage (birds/wildlife and airshows). I currently use a Nikon Z50 for normal zoom lengths and a Sony A1 plus 200-600 for telephoto. I prefer the look and colours from Nikon but Sony have been so good in terms of mirrorless autofocus that it just nails the shot really easily and consistently. I tried the Z8 and although much better than previous Nikon experiences (Z7ii) it still felt a way behind my Sony A1. The AF settings just seem overly complex to me and not very intuitive, unlike the Sony. I think with frequent use a good photographer could make it work well over time but I just felt like I was fighting the camera and as a hobbyist will not be able to put in the hours to get the most out of it. I could only afford to keep the A1 OR the Z8 and I’ve decided to keep my A1.
 
Okay this is not an urgent matter, I am not buying anytime soon but I am planning a trip back to Hong Kong early 2024 and am throwing around a few ideas for a new lens. Last time for wide angle duties I had Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 18mm f/2.8 then Tamron 28-75mm. All good lenses for their respective budgets. This time I want something a little better and here are my current thoughts/options:

1: Sony 20mm f/1.8G (£588) Probably a sensible option as being in amongst the skyscrapers you often don't have much room to step back to get more in the frame. It's small, light and has great IQ and sharpness with minimal distortion. On the downside 20mm may be a little limiting and too wide for some situations.

2: Sony 24mm f/1.4GM (£799) Small, fast, light, GM badge :ROFLMAO: , I am sure I would get lots of very good photos with this lens. It has similar qualities to the 20mm above but a bit tighter and more expensive. The 24mm I feel would be a little tight for certain shots I have planned but I think it would be amazing for lots of others, not being super-wide would make it more adaptable for different shots.

3: Sony 16-35mm f/2.8GM (£1229) An older lens, and maybe showing it's age somewhat. Very useful focal range for the city and good solid build quality. I do feel though, that it's become outshone by some of the newer and cheaper alternatives.

4: Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 (£509) I've used the brother of this lens (28-75mm f/2.8) for years and on the whole been happy with it. This wider version shares it's same qualities and quirks. Sharp, light, affordable but with a slightly limiting focal range for a zoom lens.

5: Sony 12-24mm f/4G (£999) Probably the perfect focal range for what I want. I am slightly put off by the f/4 maximum aperture but the lens is well regarded for it's image quality with very good sharpness. The curved front element set up is a bit annoying for filters but I rarely ever use them.

6: Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN A(£929) Great focal range, faster than the Sony 12-24 being f/2.8 and wonderful IQ and sharpness. Quite tempted by this one, compact for what it is, nice build etc.

(all prices are current from E-Infinity and grey imports, with the exception of the the Sigma where the price is from Cotswold Cameras)

Interested to hear your thoughts, like I say it's not an imminent purchase so I have plenty of time to mull it over (and save up :ROFLMAO:)
 
Okay this is not an urgent matter, I am not buying anytime soon but I am planning a trip back to Hong Kong early 2024 and am throwing around a few ideas for a new lens. Last time for wide angle duties I had Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 18mm f/2.8 then Tamron 28-75mm. All good lenses for their respective budgets. This time I want something a little better and here are my current thoughts/options:

1: Sony 20mm f/1.8G (£588) Probably a sensible option as being in amongst the skyscrapers you often don't have much room to step back to get more in the frame. It's small, light and has great IQ and sharpness with minimal distortion. On the downside 20mm may be a little limiting and too wide for some situations.

2: Sony 24mm f/1.4GM (£799) Small, fast, light, GM badge :ROFLMAO: , I am sure I would get lots of very good photos with this lens. It has similar qualities to the 20mm above but a bit tighter and more expensive. The 24mm I feel would be a little tight for certain shots I have planned but I think it would be amazing for lots of others, not being super-wide would make it more adaptable for different shots.

3: Sony 16-35mm f/2.8GM (£1229) An older lens, and maybe showing it's age somewhat. Very useful focal range for the city and good solid build quality. I do feel though, that it's become outshone by some of the newer and cheaper alternatives.

4: Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 (£509) I've used the brother of this lens (28-75mm f/2.8) for years and on the whole been happy with it. This wider version shares it's same qualities and quirks. Sharp, light, affordable but with a slightly limiting focal range for a zoom lens.

5: Sony 12-24mm f/4G (£999) Probably the perfect focal range for what I want. I am slightly put off by the f/4 maximum aperture but the lens is well regarded for it's image quality with very good sharpness. The curved front element set up is a bit annoying for filters but I rarely ever use them.

6: Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN A(£929) Great focal range, faster than the Sony 12-24 being f/2.8 and wonderful IQ and sharpness. Quite tempted by this one, compact for what it is, nice build etc.

(all prices are current from E-Infinity and grey imports, with the exception of the the Sigma where the price is from Cotswold Cameras)

Interested to hear your thoughts, like I say it's not an imminent purchase so I have plenty of time to mull it over (and save up :ROFLMAO:)
For travel I prefer zoom lenses on the whole as I don’t want to be limited and not be able to get the shot I want, especially considering it’s unlikely that I’d return. 16-35mm is my go to so out of those I’d choose the 16-35mm f2.8. I’d actually choose the 16-35mm pz though as 99% of the time I’m stopping down to f8-11 so there’s no need to pay the extra for f2.8.
 
Okay this is not an urgent matter, I am not buying anytime soon but I am planning a trip back to Hong Kong early 2024 and am throwing around a few ideas for a new lens. Last time for wide angle duties I had Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 18mm f/2.8 then Tamron 28-75mm. All good lenses for their respective budgets. This time I want something a little better and here are my current thoughts/options:

1: Sony 20mm f/1.8G (£588) Probably a sensible option as being in amongst the skyscrapers you often don't have much room to step back to get more in the frame. It's small, light and has great IQ and sharpness with minimal distortion. On the downside 20mm may be a little limiting and too wide for some situations.

2: Sony 24mm f/1.4GM (£799) Small, fast, light, GM badge :ROFLMAO: , I am sure I would get lots of very good photos with this lens. It has similar qualities to the 20mm above but a bit tighter and more expensive. The 24mm I feel would be a little tight for certain shots I have planned but I think it would be amazing for lots of others, not being super-wide would make it more adaptable for different shots.

3: Sony 16-35mm f/2.8GM (£1229) An older lens, and maybe showing it's age somewhat. Very useful focal range for the city and good solid build quality. I do feel though, that it's become outshone by some of the newer and cheaper alternatives.

4: Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 (£509) I've used the brother of this lens (28-75mm f/2.8) for years and on the whole been happy with it. This wider version shares it's same qualities and quirks. Sharp, light, affordable but with a slightly limiting focal range for a zoom lens.

5: Sony 12-24mm f/4G (£999) Probably the perfect focal range for what I want. I am slightly put off by the f/4 maximum aperture but the lens is well regarded for it's image quality with very good sharpness. The curved front element set up is a bit annoying for filters but I rarely ever use them.

6: Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN A(£929) Great focal range, faster than the Sony 12-24 being f/2.8 and wonderful IQ and sharpness. Quite tempted by this one, compact for what it is, nice build etc.

(all prices are current from E-Infinity and grey imports, with the exception of the the Sigma where the price is from Cotswold Cameras)

Interested to hear your thoughts, like I say it's not an imminent purchase so I have plenty of time to mull it over (and save up :ROFLMAO:)
If it is for work that you can take your time over you could add in teh Laowa 12mm with Magic Shift Converter. Really versatile combo but you need a bit of time for manual focus. If teh 20mm was too wide though then a 12mm 17mm combo probably won't work. You could swap the 12mm with another longer lens and the shift adapter is really useful for tall buildings
 
Okay this is not an urgent matter, I am not buying anytime soon but I am planning a trip back to Hong Kong early 2024 and am throwing around a few ideas for a new lens. Last time for wide angle duties I had Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 18mm f/2.8 then Tamron 28-75mm. All good lenses for their respective budgets. This time I want something a little better and here are my current thoughts/options:

1: Sony 20mm f/1.8G (£588) Probably a sensible option as being in amongst the skyscrapers you often don't have much room to step back to get more in the frame. It's small, light and has great IQ and sharpness with minimal distortion. On the downside 20mm may be a little limiting and too wide for some situations.

2: Sony 24mm f/1.4GM (£799) Small, fast, light, GM badge :ROFLMAO: , I am sure I would get lots of very good photos with this lens. It has similar qualities to the 20mm above but a bit tighter and more expensive. The 24mm I feel would be a little tight for certain shots I have planned but I think it would be amazing for lots of others, not being super-wide would make it more adaptable for different shots.

3: Sony 16-35mm f/2.8GM (£1229) An older lens, and maybe showing it's age somewhat. Very useful focal range for the city and good solid build quality. I do feel though, that it's become outshone by some of the newer and cheaper alternatives.

4: Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 (£509) I've used the brother of this lens (28-75mm f/2.8) for years and on the whole been happy with it. This wider version shares it's same qualities and quirks. Sharp, light, affordable but with a slightly limiting focal range for a zoom lens.

5: Sony 12-24mm f/4G (£999) Probably the perfect focal range for what I want. I am slightly put off by the f/4 maximum aperture but the lens is well regarded for it's image quality with very good sharpness. The curved front element set up is a bit annoying for filters but I rarely ever use them.

6: Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN A(£929) Great focal range, faster than the Sony 12-24 being f/2.8 and wonderful IQ and sharpness. Quite tempted by this one, compact for what it is, nice build etc.

(all prices are current from E-Infinity and grey imports, with the exception of the the Sigma where the price is from Cotswold Cameras)

Interested to hear your thoughts, like I say it's not an imminent purchase so I have plenty of time to mull it over (and save up :ROFLMAO:)
There's a near mint 24GM (and 14GM) in sales. I think you should buy those ;)

Unless you are planning to shoot low light I'd go with zooms. I'd personally suggest either 16-35mm f4 G or 20-70mm f4
 
There's a near mint 24GM (and 14GM) in sales. I think you should buy those ;)

Unless you are planning to shoot low light I'd go with zooms. I'd personally suggest either 16-35mm f4 G or 20-70mm f4
:ROFLMAO: (y)

I am planning lots of night shooting
 
:ROFLMAO: (y)

I am planning lots of night shooting
The 16-35mm f2.8 II might be out by the time you go so it could be worth waiting to see what that's like?
 
The 16-35mm f2.8 II might be out by the time you go so it could be worth waiting to see what that's like?

It may well, but I would imagine out of my budget.
 
I'm always sceptical from buying on eBay as eBay only protect you for something like 60 days. It's completely up to the seller whether they will help you with faults after that, and certainly if buying from an end user, very often they will blank you if there's a problem. Saying that, when you are dealing with a reputable dealer who uses eBay they are more likely to help you outwith the 60 days.

Honestly, when you’re paying about half of the UK new price, it doesn’t matter too much. The first one was from Camera World only the second one was from a private seller.
 
what is you budget?

Undecided but probably around £1k , though I have been watching videos on the 20mm f/1.8 and I am getting tempted, it looks great. Money is dependant on how much I spend on flights & hotel.
 
Undecided but probably around £1k , though I have been watching videos on the 20mm f/1.8 and I am getting tempted, it looks great. Money is dependant on how much I spend on flights & hotel.
there is a mint one of those in sales too (not mine) and I think it's a bargain.
One of the best lenses around if that's the focal length you want
 
Okay this is not an urgent matter, I am not buying anytime soon but I am planning a trip back to Hong Kong early 2024 and am throwing around a few ideas for a new lens. Last time for wide angle duties I had Samyang 14mm f/2.8, Samyang 18mm f/2.8 then Tamron 28-75mm. All good lenses for their respective budgets. This time I want something a little better and here are my current thoughts/options:

1: Sony 20mm f/1.8G (£588) Probably a sensible option as being in amongst the skyscrapers you often don't have much room to step back to get more in the frame. It's small, light and has great IQ and sharpness with minimal distortion. On the downside 20mm may be a little limiting and too wide for some situations.

2: Sony 24mm f/1.4GM (£799) Small, fast, light, GM badge :ROFLMAO: , I am sure I would get lots of very good photos with this lens. It has similar qualities to the 20mm above but a bit tighter and more expensive. The 24mm I feel would be a little tight for certain shots I have planned but I think it would be amazing for lots of others, not being super-wide would make it more adaptable for different shots.

3: Sony 16-35mm f/2.8GM (£1229) An older lens, and maybe showing it's age somewhat. Very useful focal range for the city and good solid build quality. I do feel though, that it's become outshone by some of the newer and cheaper alternatives.

4: Tamron 17-28mm f/2.8 (£509) I've used the brother of this lens (28-75mm f/2.8) for years and on the whole been happy with it. This wider version shares it's same qualities and quirks. Sharp, light, affordable but with a slightly limiting focal range for a zoom lens.

5: Sony 12-24mm f/4G (£999) Probably the perfect focal range for what I want. I am slightly put off by the f/4 maximum aperture but the lens is well regarded for it's image quality with very good sharpness. The curved front element set up is a bit annoying for filters but I rarely ever use them.

6: Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG DN A(£929) Great focal range, faster than the Sony 12-24 being f/2.8 and wonderful IQ and sharpness. Quite tempted by this one, compact for what it is, nice build etc.

(all prices are current from E-Infinity and grey imports, with the exception of the the Sigma where the price is from Cotswold Cameras)

Interested to hear your thoughts, like I say it's not an imminent purchase so I have plenty of time to mull it over (and save up :ROFLMAO:)

I've had the 20G and I've got the 24GM.

Both great lenses. Size, weight, performance, filter size (if that matters) (y)
 
New A6700 has a fore finger dial it seems


It only took then like 7-8 bodies to realise, better late than never I guess.
There is now some hope that A7Cii will have it also.
 
New A6700 has a fore finger dial it seems


It only took then like 7-8 bodies to realise, better late than never I guess.
There is now some hope that A7Cii will have it also.

I imagine it's going to be a piddly little thing like the R7 and probably no grip either :rolleyes:

I know you like your bodies small but I would prefer something larger, would go all in on Sony if they did.
 
I use the Peak design slide, I'm 6'4" and don't find it short, camera sits on my hip whilst walking :thinking:
I find the main issue is that the peak design slide doesn't allow your camera and lens to move easily without having to move the entire strap - I much prefer the lens being fixed to the strap by a single point and that point being able to move freely up and down the strap without the strap needing to move at all.

And my current strap (now almost worn out) allows my combo to hang to half way up my thigh which I found more comfortable than hitting off my hip bone when on the move.

The QD style fitting concept looks interesting, and it would be nice to have them both on my body, and on the 200-600mm foot so I can use the one strap system no matter what lens I'm using. Has anybody used a QD fitting?

Does anybody use one with their 200-600mm?
 
I know you like your bodies small but I would prefer something larger, would go all in on Sony if they did.
Haha yes. But tbh I like things to be appropriate size, not necessarily small. Obviously what's appropriate is subjective.

If I was using a large white teleprime then I think I'd like a grip on my body too.
For using a small prime, I really don't feel Z9 is comfortable.
 
Yes I agree with that which is why I would always want a grip available for any new body I buy (already been burned by the R7).
There's no 3rd party grips either?
I believe there was 3rd party grips for A6600 for example.

Guess it would be the Z8 but I see Nikon are now crippling the firmware by not giving all of the Z9 updates.
Well they need to differentiate them somehow :P
Also I am finding it funny how the large body brigade (not saying you) were quick to jump in to let me know Z9 absolutely had to be that large to support all it's features. I kept telling them a small body can do all that - welcome the Z8 :ROFLMAO:

There are bits Z9 does better like dual CFe cards vs. the slow SD card slot in Z8.
 
There's no 3rd party grips either?
I believe there was 3rd party grips for A6600 for example.


Well they need to differentiate them somehow :p
Also I am finding it funny how the large body brigade (not saying you) were quick to jump in to let me know Z9 absolutely had to be that large to support all it's features. I kept telling them a small body can do all that - welcome the Z8 :ROFLMAO:

There are bits Z9 does better like dual CFe cards vs. the slow SD card slot in Z8.

Is the Z8 just a Z9 without a grip size wise or is it actually a bit smaller?

I imagine a Z8 plus grip will be more cash than a Z9 ATM.
 
I find the main issue is that the peak design slide doesn't allow your camera and lens to move easily without having to move the entire strap - I much prefer the lens being fixed to the strap by a single point and that point being able to move freely up and down the strap without the strap needing to move at all.

And my current strap (now almost worn out) allows my combo to hang to half way up my thigh which I found more comfortable than hitting off my hip bone when on the move.

The QD style fitting concept looks interesting, and it would be nice to have them both on my body, and on the 200-600mm foot so I can use the one strap system no matter what lens I'm using. Has anybody used a QD fitting?

Does anybody use one with their 200-600mm?
Yep, that's the design hence the name ;) I assume you know the strap has two sides, one grippy side for when you're walking and don't want it to move around, and one smooth slide to allow it to slide easily?

I used to have the Black Rapid strap but it always worried me having one tether point, also it bugged me how the camera constantly spins around on your hip as you're walking. I personally much prefer the Peak Design, but obviously folk are different ;) (y)
 
New A6700 has a fore finger dial it seems


It only took then like 7-8 bodies to realise, better late than never I guess.
There is now some hope that A7Cii will have it also.
@woof woof will be happy (y)
 
New A6700 has a fore finger dial it seems


It only took then like 7-8 bodies to realise, better late than never I guess.
There is now some hope that A7Cii will have it also.
Finally! Will be interested in this as a second camera for travelling. I also heard there may be a new lens bundled with it also.
 
So the A9 has arrived, have to say a quick test of the auto focus and it instantly locked on to the eyes when the camera is pointed towards the dog. Very impressed so far. Can’t wait to try it out with some action shots
 
Back
Top