The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

Stunning stuff Dave. I got a 24-105 when I switched from Fuji a couple of months ago it's a very nice lens.
Thanks Graham - I think the 24-105 looks great. It gives you more reach than the 24-70 and fills the gap nicely if you want to go the 100-400 route instead of the 70-200.

Edit - looking at your photos the lens is doing the business :) some cracking photos
 
Last edited:
I hope Sony release the FE 135mm f1.8 GM soon..... but this 24mm f1.4 is really interesting, pretty small and compact.

Yes, I was expecting it to be a bit of a beast.

We'll have to wait for the test results but I think it'll possibly be a nice lens for night time sky shots and of course general 24mm stuff too but the big stand out will hopefully be performance at f1.4.
 
Last edited:
Question, do you guys format in NTSC or PAL?

Does it matter for stills? I think that matters more for video, I notice you get a lot more shooting options in NTSC vs PAL.

It only matters for video surely can't see how it would effect images.
 
Sell it all and get an a7iii

I like the MFT stuff as it's incredibly fast and compact for what it's capable of so I can't see myself selling it anytime soon. Still undecided on the A7III.
 
Have you got space in your display unit for another lens?

Oh yes........ I am sure I can make room for a 24mm f1.4 GM, 50mm f1.4 GM and 135mm f1.4 GM :D
Was close to pulling the trigger on the FE 100-400mm GM but rarely use telephoto's so decided against it.
 
Thanks Graham - I think the 24-105 looks great. It gives you more reach than the 24-70 and fills the gap nicely if you want to go the 100-400 route instead of the 70-200.

Edit - looking at your photos the lens is doing the business :) some cracking photos

Thanks Dave thats exactly what I did I got the 100-400 although I think im going to get a legacy 200mm prime for when I dont want to carry the 100-400 about.
 
How much? Age/condition?

One month old tomorrow. Bought from amazon uk. Mint, boxed and as new as hasn’t really been used. Was going to return it but been too busy to sort out and needed to be sent back by tomorrow.

£220 delivered. Can post tomorrow.
 
And I have the 24mm if you are looking for that instead :D

How much are you thinking of selling it for? And how come your selling it? Have been tempted to get one, but not looked to much yet in to how they are etc yet, other than the size appealing
 
Watched DPreviews on the 24 GM, very neutral, didn't make me want to buy it over the Sigma


Watched Manny Ortiz an instantly I want one as I have grown to really appreciate a lens that doesn't have CA.

 
Then I watched Fro and his shots also have CA and would pay the money for a lens that has great CA control but Fro has tons in his.…so now I am torn again


p.s. size don't matter, the Sigma is not heavier than a 85/1.4
 
This may have been done to death, but is there any way to get square format on camera (like on iphone you have photo,square,video,pano etc), camera being the A7ii ?
 
How much are you thinking of selling it for? And how come your selling it? Have been tempted to get one, but not looked to much yet in to how they are etc yet, other than the size appealing

£225 delivered

Considering the new GM so this will have to eventually go... Not in a hurry to sell at the moment so take your time ;)
 
Without resorting to the G Master lenses, what are the best Sony FE zoom options in the 24-70mm ish range?

Cheers,

Simon.

28-70 seems ok to be honest! Small, light, made of plastic but feels better built than a lot of kit lenses. Zoom is tight and foucs is snappy.
 
28-70 seems ok to be honest! Small, light, made of plastic but feels better built than a lot of kit lenses. Zoom is tight and foucs is snappy.

Although might sell mine to fund a 35mm!
 
28-70 seems ok to be honest! Small, light, made of plastic but feels better built than a lot of kit lenses. Zoom is tight and foucs is snappy.
If you need to upgrade but can't stretch to G Master prices... the £749 Tamrom 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RXD seems to get good reviews. :)
 
If you need to upgrade but can't stretch to G Master prices... the £749 Tamrom 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RXD seems to get good reviews. :)

Don't use the range much - so probably just get teh 35mm Samyang, unless the Sony one is THAT much better?!
 
Don't use the range much - so probably just get teh 35mm Samyang, unless the Sony one is THAT much better?!

The difference is small but it’s there. Some prefer the Samyang but the Sigma is probably a safer bet.
 
Sony 24mm f1.4, Sigma 24mm f1.4 and 35mm f1.4 and 55mm f1.8 just for comparison.

Untitled-1.jpg

The Sigma hood will make it look bigger.

I hadn't realised that the Sony was so much more than the Sigma but looking at the cost v bulk of these I doubt very much I'll be buying either.
 
Last edited:
Sony 24mm f1.4, Sigma 24mm f1.4 and 35mm f1.4 and 55mm f1.8 just for comparison.

View attachment 134853

The Sigma hood will make it look bigger.

I hadn't realised that the Sony was so much more than the Sigma but looking at the cost v bulk of these I doubt very much I'll be buying either.

The long flange on the Sigma doesnt really help its size or looks! Guess they just adpated the existing DSLR version.
 
Last edited:
Sony 24mm f1.4, Sigma 24mm f1.4 and 35mm f1.4 and 55mm f1.8 just for comparison.

View attachment 134853

The Sigma hood will make it look bigger.

I hadn't realised that the Sony was so much more than the Sigma but looking at the cost v bulk of these I doubt very much I'll be buying either.

Take away the hood it looks like it's at MAX, an inch taller?
 
Steve Huff and the 24mm f1.4...

http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2018/...ster-fe-lens-in-hand-1399-and-ready-to-astro/

"The Sony 24 1.4 GM lens looks fantastic, has a manual aperture dial that can be “de-clicked” and is pretty small for a lens of this type. At $1399 it is also cheaper than the Canon and Nikon though more pricey than the Sigma. It beats them all on paper, but IMO each of these lenses offer up a little bit different kind of style and character. The Sony has no real “character” to speak of and is a little bit “sterile” even but this lens is for the perfectionists. Even with only a couple hours of using this lens, I can easily recommend it. It is a G Master after all, Sony’s top of the line, so how can you go wrong?"
 
I like the MFT stuff as it's incredibly fast and compact for what it's capable of so I can't see myself selling it anytime soon. Still undecided on the A7III.
I couldn’t bring myself to part with all my MFT gear. I’ve kept my E-m1 Mkii and the 60mm Macro lens for just the purpose of macro. It’s exactly as you describe, fast and light plus small so ideal for macro and nothing else Sony has for macro comes close enough in terms of features for me to make the change.
It would defy economics for me to sell my remaining MFT gear and replace it with Sony.
 
Steve Huff and the 24mm f1.4...

http://www.stevehuffphoto.com/2018/...ster-fe-lens-in-hand-1399-and-ready-to-astro/

"The Sony 24 1.4 GM lens looks fantastic, has a manual aperture dial that can be “de-clicked” and is pretty small for a lens of this type. At $1399 it is also cheaper than the Canon and Nikon though more pricey than the Sigma. It beats them all on paper, but IMO each of these lenses offer up a little bit different kind of style and character. The Sony has no real “character” to speak of and is a little bit “sterile” even but this lens is for the perfectionists. Even with only a couple hours of using this lens, I can easily recommend it. It is a G Master after all, Sony’s top of the line, so how can you go wrong?"

From looking at his channel he much much prefer lenses with character, that’s mostly what he sings about. I know he recommends the Sony 24 GM but I would doubt he will own it himself.
 
How quick is the AF on the Samyang 35mm 2.8? Im guessing it will out perform the 28-70 at 35mm?
 
Back
Top