A7_00769.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00758.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00721.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00713.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00714.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00719.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00747.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00757.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on FlickrA7_00769.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00758.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00721.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00713.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00714.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00719.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00747.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
A7_00757.jpg by Rizvan Hussain, on Flickr
steve the purple in the sky,is that how it was?I always just used it for what it is, a very small general purpose kit lens. It’s got middle of the road variable aperture and a reasonable APS-C zoom range. It’s never going to deliver shallow depth of field portraits or long tele photography but it’s a <£100 general purpose lens.
View attachment 126879
View attachment 126880
View attachment 126881
How've you uploaded these Steve as they look very pixelated like bad jpeg artefacting on my screen, are they really low res?I always just used it for what it is, a very small general purpose kit lens. It’s got middle of the road variable aperture and a reasonable APS-C zoom range. It’s never going to deliver shallow depth of field portraits or long tele photography but it’s a <£100 general purpose lens.
View attachment 126879
View attachment 126880
View attachment 126881
They look fine here.How've you uploaded these Steve as they look very pixelated like bad jpeg artefacting on my screen, are they really low res?
steve the purple in the sky,is that how it was?
you may have a point Steve,does anyone else see the purple in the blue and whiteIt was a blue sky and it looks blue here? Have you checked your screen calibration? :0)
How've you uploaded these Steve as they look very pixelated like bad jpeg artefacting on my screen, are they really low res?
you may have a point Steve,does anyone else see the purple in the blue and white
night and day difference,look fine from those links,no im using a macThey’re images exported from Flickr then massively compressed by the forum uploader through the app.
https://flic.kr/p/zJCc91
https://flic.kr/p/yPUQp7
https://flic.kr/p/zJD8j5
Any opinions on the Loxia 21mm on a A7R2.
Only downside is it is manual focus only which i have not tried before as all my previous camera`s lenses have been AF
I see Cameraworld have it at £1,099 at the minute which seems to be the cheapest.
does anyone else see the purple in the blue and white
It was a blue sky and it looks blue here? Have you checked your screen calibration? :0)
you may have a point Steve,does anyone else see the purple in the blue and white
night and day difference,look fine from those links,no im using a mac
The ones on here doe have purple 'blotches' and as I said they look pixelated/blocky like a really poor quality file. But I agree with Snake, they look fine on flickr. I'm using Mac too, and yes my screen is calibrated![]()
Any opinions on the Loxia 21mm on a A7R2.
Only downside is it is manual focus only which i have not tried before as all my previous camera`s lenses have been AF
I see Cameraworld have it at £1,099 at the minute which seems to be the cheapest.
Had an impromptu walk yesterday evening around Entwistle reservoir.
![]()
![]()
I put the mc-11 adapter on my A7R3 with the Sigma 150-600C tonight and I’m not impressed, AF was problematic as was stabilisation.
I had bought the 100-400 thinking that the 1.4 tc from Sony would be a formality to obtain but no such luck. It doesn’t seem to be available anywhere in the world. 400mm is just too short for my purposes so until Sony manage to produce the TC I’ll have to try and get on with the Sigma.
Brake pads replaced and it was under warranty, totally free including labour.
Score.
I’m going back to the shop tomorrow and try out a different mc-11.Im using the S version 150 to 600 and so far its worked flawlessly, that was after updating the lens and fanning with the MC settings.
35 50 and 85 art lenses next week![]()
Still not set on what 85mm to get.
Sony 85/1.8
Zeiss 85/1.8
Sigma 84/1.4
G-Master 85/1.4
Pick of the bunch has to be the Sigma for a balance of price, IQ and aperture?
Still not set on what 85mm to get.
Sony 85/1.8
Zeiss 85/1.8
Sigma 84/1.4
G-Master 85/1.4
Pick of the bunch has to be the Sigma for a balance of price, IQ and aperture?
For £100-200 more you can pick up a used GM.
Perhaps pick Sony or batis 85/1.8 for far AF since you already have the canon 85/1.2 which has show AF.
I don't even think the GM has the best IQ or bokeh of the 4.
I think it does
But of course tastes will differ.
I think it does
But of course tastes will differ.
The canon 85mm/1.2 is the best 85mm in terms of rendering.
Stick with the Canon like meI don't even think the GM has the best IQ or bokeh of the 4.
I thought 35 and 85 later release than 50? Damn forgot were into june!!
What settings did you "fanny" around with?Im using the S version 150 to 600 and so far its worked flawlessly, that was after updating the lens and fanning with the MC settings.
The 85mm f1.4 GM is a pretty good lens however it depends what you want from a lens, for example the AF is slower than the Zeiss Batis 85mm f1.8.I don't even think the GM has the best IQ or bokeh of the 4.