snerkler
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,078
- Name
- Toby
- Edit My Images
- No
Any word on whether Sony will ever offer lossless compressed?I'm not getting into brand loyalty. Whilst I shoot with an A7 now and and A6000 previously, my camera shelf has considerably more film kit on it so my digital gear is just a tool. I'm not suggesting ignoring the problem, I've already said it would be good to understand what's causing it. However, the usual knee jerk reactions of the internet also need to be addressed as, to some, the camera has gone from the best option to completely useless in the space of a few example images. My question was, honestly, how many people actually shoot in these situations where the issue may present itself and, more importantly, would actually make the camera useless?
As Nandbytes suggested above, the agony expressed by some (also on DPR) when Sony only offered compressed RAW files was ridiculous. However, Sony then updated the firmware to allow uncompressed RAWs and the same people complained that he image files were larger, took longer to process and offered no real world benefits (except to those who were deliberately shooting at 5-6 stops underexposure and boosting in post..). My point is that there is clearly banding of some sort on those examples shared but the reality of the whole image shows that it's only actually visible when magnified on that specific area. I;m not ignoring it's there, just asking for some balance.
Hana-shoreditch-shoot-pt2--209.jpg
3-1
2-1
5-1
