Comments like the following make me wonder, is it prejudice or am I missing something?
http://theonlinephotographer.typepa.../01/top-camera-of-the-year-2015.html#comments
"Blarg. Am I the only one who finds the Sony cameras completely uninspiring? Weird handling, wacky sounding shutters
and the overall feeling that you're completely plugged into a computer/disconnected from reality. I played around with the first iteration of these cameras and took a pass, then came back again to see if they could change my mind (because in theory they're perfect), and once again walked away cold. I really WANT these cameras to work for me, but it's not meant to be."
Is the poster out to knock Sony or CSC's in general or is this a genuine view and if so why the disconnect?
I've read similar posts several times on forums and sometimes references to Playstations are thrown in and I wonder if I'm missing something as to me the A7 or indeed any CSC I've used is no more a soulless computer than any DSLR I've owned. Funny how computers and Playstations get mentioned when Sony cameras are being discussed but I can't remember anyone linking Canon DSLR's to photocopiers.
If peaking, zebras and in view histograms are the cause and are too advanced and too phasing they can be turned off and to me the only real difference between a CSC and a DSLR apart from size and weight is the EVF. Maybe the problem is that electronic companies make CSC's and will be sneered at until a generation dies off and less prejudiced youngsters grow up and prevail?
I don't care who makes the gear, badges mean next to nothing to me. If Aunt Bessie started making camera gear I'd buy it if it was any good.
