There would be a great deal of reflection back from the dog's white legs and the middle persons legs. However.. if it has, why is that a problem. Everyone in this forum retouches and processes work, yet we expect a high end prize image to not have any, and criticise it if it has. How strange. It's like admiting it's OK with your work work, because that's just crap, but a prize winner should have none.
In as much as it the photographer chose to shoot in this style, then yes. Does that matter too? I think you'll find most portraits are "set up"![]()
I don't recall any animal holding last year. I remember a goat in a backpack.. or maybe that was a dream.. LOL
They're typologies... nothing new.... nothing that August Sander wasn't doing early last century. Sometimes it's the best way to see a person.. sometimes, ironically, the personality gets in the way. That shot of Lenny Henry is a good example. Do we need another image of Lenny Henry in a baggy, brightly coloured suit acting stupid? Would that shot of the little girl with the skateboard be better if she was smiling? I'm not saying no one can ever smile in a portrait, I'm just asking what would these two images I mention have that they don't have now?
The first one doesnt do it for me - it looks like a moment/snapshot
Shortlisted - like skate girl - the others leave me cold - indecisive moment I get but it just feels dull
Longlisted - none of them - I've been trying to avoid telegrph poles growing out of people's heads and I would hope a competition entry winner could avoid that
I still might go to see the exhibition, mind.
Very last image - Vijay Rudanlalji Banspal, by Karan Kumar Sachdev.I can't see any with telegraph poles sticking out of heads. What are you looking at?
Very last image - Vijay Rudanlalji Banspal, by Karan Kumar Sachdev.
Ok - out of the side of his beard - but it's there