Tattoos?

Wouldn't stop me photographing anyone who had them but I fail to see the appeal of them. That said, I would specify a model without them when possible.
 
inaneredstripe said:
as far as models go,people have different tastes too, i spose
tattoo,d or not, dark or blonde , slim or curvy.
Click to expand...

This. I mean, when you think of a shoot, you think of how you want the model to look. This will surely include body mods? If you want a blonde model, you wouldn't hire a brunette, etc.
 
im covered in tats myself have 40 all over back,legs,chest and arms and it wouldn't bother me shooting a model that has them..

the only portrait stuff ive done is with an ex girlfriend who had loads and the finished images look good..

i would have to agree it does limit the models options but the goth look is in at the mo(yay im trendy at last lol)
 
I'm actually going to get another tattoo tomorrow and have two dermal piercings in my neck and a labret piercing (Lip)... A female friend of mine has a huge number of piercings (all tasteful) and three brandings on her leg - which I originally found a bit of an eye sore (she is pretty gorgeous btw), but now they have healed they look amazing.

It's all down to personal preference, I know what I like and it's a lot different from many others, but then beauty is in the eye of the beholder! :love:

ps - Kat Von D is definately good looking!:clap:
 
I usually find that the 'canvas' is as important as the artwork. Personally I like tats on girls...a lot. The phot of Kat Von D is a case in point...beautiful girl, beautiful art...
A bad tat is a bad tat though - whoever it's inked on to...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top