You will never feel the benefit, the only ones that will benefit are the producers and suppliers. Only increases are passed on, never reductions.I keep hearing about cheap renewable energy, but my electricity costs keep rising, just when will it take effect.
I'd love to agree with you Paul but I'm not convinced yet of the economics for the industry, especially vans and lorries. But I'd like to be. My main point is just that I keep hearing about progress in synthetic fuels which means competition for market share will remain the case.
I've been watching the similar climate issues in the maritime transport industry where alternatives to heavy oil are being trialled quite successfully, though not yet as ultimately clean as would be liked.
You will never feel the benefit, the only ones that will benefit are the producers and suppliers. Only increases are passed on, never reductions.
until the big builds are complete electricity prices will not go down, in approx 5/6 years we will have an estimated 50 gw/h of wind alone
Rome wasn't built in a day.
However we are already seeing amazing cheap EV tarriffs which is where the savings are to be had, Octopus do an overnight EV tariff of about 7p per kw/h which if your EV does 3 miles per kw.h is like 2.3p per mile so for 200miles of range its about £4.60p
if you do the longer term maths 1000 miles is about £23 so say 10,000 miles a year £230 in leccy
compared to an average car say 50mpg and a gallon of unlead currently at a very cheap price about £5.50p
so again maths time so thats 11p/mile x 10,000 = £1,100
so more maths lets look at say 5 years
50,000 miles of petrol is £5500
50,000 miles of octopus leccy is £1150
so we can see straight away almost 4.5k fuel saving and that is available now , right this minute.
however remember fuel is at its cheapest for ages if we look at the cost of fuel at a more realistic level of say £7/gallon then the numbers are massive
your ICE car will cost you £7k for 50,000 miles vs EV at £1150 for the same 50,000 miles so a saving nearly 6k over the 5 years
and that is before we start talking about the additional cost of services for an ICE car over an EV for 5 years.....................phew
Then factor in the much higher initial cost and annual depreciation of EVs, the reduced range year on year and the possibility that not everyone will be able to access cheap charging.
As Cambso pointed out, it suits his circumstances, but as others have pointed out, it doesn't suit theirs. It certainly doesn't suit mine and therefore I will be buying diesels for the forseeable future.
Don't forget that a large % of the cost of fuel is tax. The government is looking at road pricing (Pay per Mile) which will increase the cost of EV usage while keeping ICE costs similar to currently. Assuming the government does not want riots of ICE drivers by not removing fuel duty completely.until the big builds are complete electricity prices will not go down, in approx 5/6 years we will have an estimated 50 gw/h of wind alone
Rome wasn't built in a day.
However we are already seeing amazing cheap EV tarriffs which is where the savings are to be had, Octopus do an overnight EV tariff of about 7p per kw/h which if your EV does 3 miles per kw.h is like 2.3p per mile so for 200miles of range its about £4.60p
if you do the longer term maths 1000 miles is about £23 so say 10,000 miles a year £230 in leccy
compared to an average car say 50mpg and a gallon of unlead currently at a very cheap price about £5.50p
so again maths time so thats 11p/mile x 10,000 = £1,100
so more maths lets look at say 5 years
50,000 miles of petrol is £5500
50,000 miles of octopus leccy is £1150
so we can see straight away almost 4.5k fuel saving and that is available now , right this minute.
however remember fuel is at its cheapest for ages if we look at the cost of fuel at a more realistic level of say £7/gallon then the numbers are massive
your ICE car will cost you £7k for 50,000 miles vs EV at £1150 for the same 50,000 miles so a saving nearly 6k over the 5 years
and that is before we start talking about the additional cost of services for an ICE car over an EV for 5 years.....................phew
Don't forget that a large % of the cost of fuel is tax. The government is looking at road pricing (Pay per Mile) which will increase the cost of EV usage while keeping ICE costs similar to currently. Assuming the government does not want riots of ICE drivers by not removing fuel duty completely.
you dont think the cost of fuel is going up then as well?
Blimey Labour needs billions to plug the tory hole
diesel is going to get battered for starters lol
its an easy/filthy target
Most older ICE cars don't have the same fuel economy they did when they were new. Parts wear, you get carbon deposits etc. One of the best things about EV's is that there are fewer moving parts to service.Regards battery degrading; We keep hearing that current models are better than older models. Well, let me know when they have zero degrading. Otherwise you are just Guinea Pigs for future buyers.
I have found the older I get the more flatulence I have.While on the subject of pensions has anybody mentioned hydrogen yet?
Have we not got a thread about EV's?
My cousin is the chief fire officer for Jersey. They are extremely concerned about the risks EV's pose. Not only EV's but e-bikes are also major headache for them as they are generally stored and charged indoors.
Sorry but I don't believe petrol weed burners under the bed (especially as most weed burners use gas cartridges) were the most common cause of house fires. Unless of course you only dealt with about 3 house fires.I worked in insurance for a bit. The majority of our house fires (I ran stats on this) were caused by cheap petrol powered weed burners. Elderly customers like to buy them because they don't have the mobility to do hand weeding. Since they are generally quite big, most people store them under the spare bed. This is horrifying.
Second most common (a l-o-n-g way behind) was electric scooter batteries. In every single case these were wither no brand scooters off of the cheap sites or decent brands which were being charged with a knock off charger. We know this for a fact because if it were the manufacturer's charger we could claim the cost of the house fire against them so we always checked.
3 things to stop your house catching fire:
Oh, and don't live next to a cannabis farm - there was a local incident where some entrepreneurs had stripped out all the fire breaks in the loft space in a whole row of houses to grow more drugs. They may also have patched directly into the electricity supply to bypass the meter and cut overheads. It ended predictably.
- Don't smoke - and don't allow anybody else to smoke anywhere near it
- Always buy decent batteries and chargers from a reputable company (genuinely, there's a reason they cost more)
- Don't put a weed burner under the spare bed.
Electric cars ain't anywhere on the list.
Have we not got a thread about EV's?
Certainly the older members of my family(those of pensionable age) have no intention of going down the EV route. There is firstly the cost, added to that trying to understand how they work and how they charge them.(mainly trying to understand charging tarrifs etc) One of them is scared of getting in an EV car because of fear of them catching fire. Which I suspect her fear has also had an effect the others.
OK.Sorry but I don't believe petrol weed burners under the bed (especially as most weed burners use gas cartridges) were the most common cause of house fires. Unless of course you only dealt with about 3 house fires.
I am pretty sure if they were such a common cause there would be some alerts about it.
OK.
One thing I've learned from this thread / forum / internet is that once somebody's mind is made up, there's no point discussing any further.
Really, petrol weed burners under the bed is the number one cause of house fires and we are supposed to accept that statement without challenging it?OK.
One thing I've learned from this thread / forum / internet is that once somebody's mind is made up, there's no point discussing any further.
That's not what I meant. Older people are generally more set in there ways and have less of an understanding of modern technical items. Their concerns as expressed to me in conversations is understanding electric cars. Their perception may be skewed by the fact that a couple of their kids have Tesla's (big screen in middle of dash, no keys etc) then their is all the thing of setting up the charging point and tariffs etc for them it seems like a lot of faff for nothing. That is without the outlay for an EV.Unless you like going into the bonnet every weekend, they work like any other car. And to charge its easier than fuel, just plug in like you would a toaster! No getting fuels confused or having to do anything else.
Thankfully none of them have ever owned a petrol weed killer though.That's not what I meant. Older people are generally more set in there ways and have less of an understanding of modern technical items. Their concerns as expressed to me in conversations is understanding electric cars. Their perception may be skewed by the fact that a couple of their kids have Tesla's (big screen in middle of dash, no keys etc) then their is all the thing of setting up the charging point and tariffs etc for them it seems like a lot of faff for nothing. That is without the outlay for an . EV.
The rattle of the silly stats.Yes, my mind is made up and so is yours. That's why you're not willing to accept the concerns of somebody who's main role is risk management and instead rattle of some silly stats about weed burners.
Honestly, I don't know anyone who owns a weed burner let alone keeps one in their house or under their bed.
We also know that insurance companies have no way of claiming costs of damage from manufacturers so please stop taking crap.
That's not what I meant. Older people are generally more set in there ways and have less of an understanding of modern technical items. Their concerns as expressed to me in conversations is understanding electric cars. Their perception may be skewed by the fact that a couple of their kids have Tesla's (big screen in middle of dash, no keys etc) then their is all the thing of setting up the charging point and tariffs etc for them it seems like a lot of faff for nothing. That is without the outlay for an EV.
I don't buy this tech argument - ok, someone aged 90 maybe, but even someone who is 70 should be reasonably tech savvy. In fact it's not different to a giant iPhone and using that. Most cars have apply or android connection and its similar to that. Maps, music works in same way. Seat adjustment is like in any other car. There is not much to setup. And if you have home charging, the majority will NOT need to use public charging unless they go on that one or two big trips a year (and even then, its just setting up an account with Tesla taking a couple of mins and you just literally plug in and unplug. Job done! Ok, other chargers need their own account and are not as quick as Tesla but it is still pretty easy to do. If you can operate Apple Music or Netflix, running an EV is no harder
I know there’s another thread for electric cars but as I said on that , what doesn’t get mentioned is the upfront cost of buying an electric vehicle
We are retired on a fixed income, there’s no way we could afford or justify buying an electric car
Even ignoring the range issues which is a thing as I do several long trips a year for photography
Our current car a Yaris cost us £12 K new , pre registered and has many years life left in it there’s now way we could afford a current electric car
Just got back from Ireland, where diesel is cheaper than petrol and both are more expensive than in the UK!
Yes, when low running costs are being trumpeted they omit the huge difference in purchase costs which if spread over four or five years would torpedo their predicted savings.
Depends on your purchasing model and what you are happy to pay. Like I have said, I could have stayed in my sportage for another year (was on pcp). Tesla was 135 a month more but am getting that back in fuel savings, even if I factor in road tax and cost of a home charger. So I do have a smaller car but didn’t really need an suv now although I like them. However my car is much faster and nicer to drive and better tech.
As with anything, everyone is different. I could buy a 4 year old focus but prefer not to which would be far cheaper.
I don't buy this tech argument - ok, someone aged 90 maybe, but even someone who is 70 should be reasonably tech savvy. In fact it's not different to a giant iPhone and using that. Most cars have apply or android connection and its similar to that. Maps, music works in same way. Seat adjustment is like in any other car. There is not much to setup. And if you have home charging, the majority will NOT need to use public charging unless they go on that one or two big trips a year (and even then, its just setting up an account with Tesla taking a couple of mins and you just literally plug in and unplug. Job done! Ok, other chargers need their own account and are not as quick as Tesla but it is still pretty easy to do. If you can operate Apple Music or Netflix, running an EV is no harder