
Which do you reckon is the most reliable indication of accurate driving speed?


I think it's generally accepted that speedos read over by about 10%. An indicated 34mph on my speedo is 30mph on the satnav. I do tend to go by the satnav reading.
Which do you reckon is the most reliable indication of accurate driving speed?
That would be the photograph they take from those little vans with the tinted windows Cedric![]()
I was "reportedly" doing 44 MPH in a 40 some years back. Damned sure that I was doing 45 (speedo) though![]()

That would be back in the days before you were a Cobra, when you were a Black Mamba i suppose Chris?![]()
I will have to go by my speedometer as I don't have (and will not have) a satnav.
From my experience, satnavs seem to turn people into idiots. I have seen drivers who know where they are going, follow a ridiculously more complex route just because the satnav told them too.
If I was driving with one it would be thrown out of the window after a few miles!
Steve.

I tend not to use the speedo anyway. I regulate my speed with the rev limiter..........
I tend not to use the speedo anyway. I regulate my speed with the rev limiter..........

sat nav's are not accurate and neither is speedo's it is a hard one this
sat nav's are only realiable on the in built versions as there is more than one sensor built in to the car normal sat navs only have the one making them slower and hard to judge the correct distance i have noticed a few times that the sat nav was faster than the car
also the new digital speedos are meant to be accurate to within something close to the actual speed you re doing
your car speedo will "over-read" by 10%, iirc this is a legal requirement.