yourapocalypse
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 889
- Name
- Spike
- Edit My Images
- Yes
OK, so this has been playing across my mind for a while now, and I was reminded of it by a post in another thread:
Has anyone else experienced preferential treatment simply down to the size or obvious quality of their camera? I can think of a couple of occasions where I have.
The first that springs to mind was shooting seals on the beach on Boxing Day (Sea Palling in Norfolk, huge seal colony there). On reaching the lines of people taking photos with p&s and phone cams, I pulled out my 350D and the crowds parted like the Red Sea. However I then found myself playing second fiddle to a lass with a D200. It was like the crowd reached an unspoken concensus, 'biggest camera gets best position'.
The other situation I think of is at gigs (the small kind where you don't need a photo pass) or when I do burlesque nights. The p&s types seem to automatically get out of the way as soon as they see a 'proper' camera wielded nearby.
Now I know we're constantly told that it's the photographer that counts, not the camera, and by and large this is wisdom. But has anyone else found that having a bigger, shinier, more expensive looking camera has put them in a situation where they can take better photos?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashers View Post
for some reason the police let me thru the cordon to take some pics..... they stopped the other people. i dunno why lolYou must have looked like the press!!
Has anyone else experienced preferential treatment simply down to the size or obvious quality of their camera? I can think of a couple of occasions where I have.
The first that springs to mind was shooting seals on the beach on Boxing Day (Sea Palling in Norfolk, huge seal colony there). On reaching the lines of people taking photos with p&s and phone cams, I pulled out my 350D and the crowds parted like the Red Sea. However I then found myself playing second fiddle to a lass with a D200. It was like the crowd reached an unspoken concensus, 'biggest camera gets best position'.
The other situation I think of is at gigs (the small kind where you don't need a photo pass) or when I do burlesque nights. The p&s types seem to automatically get out of the way as soon as they see a 'proper' camera wielded nearby.
Now I know we're constantly told that it's the photographer that counts, not the camera, and by and large this is wisdom. But has anyone else found that having a bigger, shinier, more expensive looking camera has put them in a situation where they can take better photos?

)