mikeyw
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,436
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Guys,
Ive had the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 for a good few months now and even did a wedding with it on my D90, in the main Ive been pretty happy with it but my curiosity makes my wonder whether the similarly priced Tamron 17-50 F2.8 might be slightly better overall.
The Sigma seems pretty quick but does occasionally creep, I also seem to get some soft focus results at times but that might also be my poor technique. The last thing that I dont care for is the yellow hue it delivers in certain light, easily corrected in pping but rather it wasnt there all the same.
Im sure the Tamron isnt perfect but Im starting to get drawn towards swapping what do people think ?....will I notice any improvement ?.....my key criteria is image sharpness and I believe the Tamron might just have the edge ?
TIA,
Mike.
Ive had the Sigma 18-50 F2.8 for a good few months now and even did a wedding with it on my D90, in the main Ive been pretty happy with it but my curiosity makes my wonder whether the similarly priced Tamron 17-50 F2.8 might be slightly better overall.
The Sigma seems pretty quick but does occasionally creep, I also seem to get some soft focus results at times but that might also be my poor technique. The last thing that I dont care for is the yellow hue it delivers in certain light, easily corrected in pping but rather it wasnt there all the same.
Im sure the Tamron isnt perfect but Im starting to get drawn towards swapping what do people think ?....will I notice any improvement ?.....my key criteria is image sharpness and I believe the Tamron might just have the edge ?
TIA,
Mike.