Bristolian
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 4,428
- Name
- Steve
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm not normally someone who bothers too much about how many pictures my cameras have taken ... they either work or they're broken 
However, I was a bit bored this morning so thought I'd check my D300 that was recently repaired by Nikon and two things leapt out at me. Firstly, during the time Nikon had the body the number of shutter actuations went up by 731 but the file number count only increased by 45. Secondly, since the body came back from repair it has taken 484 pictures (it's not my prime body at the moment) but the shutter count has only gone up by 434
All of these figures are taken from the information provided by shuttercount. In the first instance I loaded the last image taken before sending the body back to Nikon and the first I took on its return - DSC_1952 & DSC_1997 with shutter counts of 12282 and 13013 respectively. Secondly, DSC_1997 & DSC_2431 came up with 13013 and 13447.
So, I guess the question it raises in my mind is: can we trust the information provided by the likes of shuttercount?
However, I was a bit bored this morning so thought I'd check my D300 that was recently repaired by Nikon and two things leapt out at me. Firstly, during the time Nikon had the body the number of shutter actuations went up by 731 but the file number count only increased by 45. Secondly, since the body came back from repair it has taken 484 pictures (it's not my prime body at the moment) but the shutter count has only gone up by 434

All of these figures are taken from the information provided by shuttercount. In the first instance I loaded the last image taken before sending the body back to Nikon and the first I took on its return - DSC_1952 & DSC_1997 with shutter counts of 12282 and 13013 respectively. Secondly, DSC_1997 & DSC_2431 came up with 13013 and 13447.
So, I guess the question it raises in my mind is: can we trust the information provided by the likes of shuttercount?