FishyFish
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 8,792
- Name
- Nige
- Edit My Images
- No
Thanks Fraser.Love these![]()
Thanks Fraser.Love these![]()



Yashica Mat 124G
Kodak Portra 400
Lab developed
Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro
Blue Renault by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
Red Ford by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
Hubcap selfie by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
I was there (a few times) recently.Bronica at 75mm
Incident meter
Fomapan 100 in HC110 at box
I underexposed this a bit, probably not the best film for a shady woodland scene, so had a mess about and spent 30 seconds in lightroom (which is a long time for me) to get it back to something like how I envisioned it .
Steps to a square.
View attachment 466006






OMG is that first one a Sunbeam Imp? Flatmate of mine had the Hillman version, and I had a Ginetta G15 with the Imp Sport engine. great little cars if you could cope with little problems, like the weight on the back and the disk brakes on the front!The last of this set from the car show...
Yashica Mat 124G
Kodak Portra 400
Lab developed
Home scanned and converted with Negative Lab Pro
Sunbeam by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
Yellow fire by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
Blue Austin by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr
I'm honestly not sure, Chris. I confess to photographing cars because they make good subjects rather than my having any real automotive interest.OMG is that first one a Sunbeam Imp? Flatmate of mine had the Hillman version, and I had a Ginetta G15 with the Imp Sport engine. great little cars if you could cope with little problems, like the weight on the back and the disk brakes on the front!
I think it is the Imp-based Sunbeam Sport, which had a twin carb giving a bit more performance. It could also be the similarly specced Sunbeam Stiletto, which had a "Fastback". It looks like the suspension has been lowered.OMG is that first one a Sunbeam Imp? Flatmate of mine had the Hillman version, and I had a Ginetta G15 with the Imp Sport engine. great little cars if you could cope with little problems, like the weight on the back and the disk brakes on the front!
Stuck the reg into the search engine, turned up some images from FB pages; you're right, that suspension has definitely been lowered!I think it is the Imp-based Sunbeam Sport, which had a twin carb giving a bit more performance. It could also be the similarly specced Sunbeam Stiletto, which had a "Fastback". It looks like the suspension has been lowered.

Thanks for showing those. I like them, especially the motion. A very tricky subject to try as your first go with shooting film!This is my 1st attempt at shooting film Pentax ME Kodak ultramax 400


Bronica at 75mm
Incident meter
Fomapan 100 in HC110 at box
I underexposed this a bit, probably not the best film for a shady woodland scene, so had a mess about and spent 30 seconds in lightroom (which is a long time for me) to get it back to something like how I envisioned it .
Steps to a square.
View attachment 466006

is that the other side of the arch Peter?Adrian further up the steps in 1973, taken with a Zenit B, Helios standard lens, Tri-X. Found this while searching for a reflection picture in my archive.
View attachment 466350




That's an unusual view of the castle and bridges, excellent viewpoint. May I comment that it would work a little better, still being being cropped square, eliminating some of the sky in the top right of the frame.


Coastal erosion by fishyfish_arcade, on Flickr



Denmark Rd #1 2025-10-29-0025 by Keith Hudson, on FlickrGood question, and I only wish I had an answer! While there's a hint of this on the original scan, I think these have been increased by sharpening the scan, and possibly made worse by the contrast of black on white. It was a trial of a lens I had picked up cheaply to use with the Canon, so these photos are a test at 28mm. The lens is certainly prone to flare as can be seen on the second one, but also other shots where the sun is anywhere forward of the line of the camera.That's incredible, no grain whatsoever!
What are the white artifacts, around the black writing, in the first picture called. I have seen the black ones but never white like that.
Good question, and I only wish I had an answer! While there's a hint of this on the original scan, I think these have been increased by sharpening the scan, and possibly made worse by the contrast of black on white. It was a trial of a lens I had picked up cheaply to use with the Canon, so these photos are a test at 28mm. The lens is certainly prone to flare as can be seen on the second one, but also other shots where the sun is anywhere forward of the line of the camera.
No, I didn't use noise reduction of any kind.Is it AI noise reduction?
No, I didn't use noise reduction of any kind.
Xtol is a rather fine grained developer, I do like the results though in the 5L Kodak packs it is a bit difficult for occasional users myself included.That's incredible, no grain whatsoever!
What are the white artifacts, around the black writing, in the first picture called. I have seen the black ones but never white like that.
That was 7 minutes at 1+1, which was a bit shorter than that Massive Dev Chart suggests.What was the development time if you don't mind me asking?
I will have to make myself some of that Ascorbic developer.
Those are not fine grain Keith they are zero grain, like yours.Xtol is a rather fine grained developer, I do like the results though in the 5L Kodak packs it is a bit difficult for occasional users myself included.