Show us yer film shots then!

QE Hospital in Birmingham ,and yes it's a along as it looks, even longer when you are carrying studio lights :(
 
A couple from the Mallory Park Plum Pudding race meeting last year; both taken on a Nikon FM with 50mm f2.0 lens on expired Kodacolor 200, Asda dev & scan.

Both shots feature a D-type Jag replica that was racing; sounded awesome!


Jaguar D-Type by Strappster, on Flickr


Jaguar D-Type by Strappster, on Flickr

The second's a crop but I'm still pretty pleased at how it came out for my first attempt at panning with an MF camera. Mind you, there's at least another film's worth that are a succession of blurry colours. :)
 
Gandhi said:
mwhahahahahahahahaaha :D

I'm quite pleased with this one!
Click to expand...

The bottom half of that is amazing Spence. The dark rocks on the right hand side is a bit distracting, but I can see why you like it. I'd be very happy if it was mine :thumbs:
 
Gandhi said:
mwhahahahahahahahaaha :D

I'm quite pleased with this one!
Click to expand...

Very nice.
I've been playing with Adox 25 art and i'm liking it.
6695889317_5e37926f1d_b.jpg
[/url] Adox 25 art by Marvin d martian100, on Flickr[/IMG]

Mart
 
Love the first one Andy :thumbs:

Trying to get 13 shots from a roll last year...


mamiya c330 / provia 100
 
Psh, what's with all these smooth looking landscapes, time for some gritty street! :p

scan1201160005.jpg


scan1201160008.jpg



There are times when I seriously consider buying a 35 for my M4, then I realise the Hexar has a Summicron killer:
scan1201160010.jpg


scan1201160012.jpg


scan1201160013.jpg


scan1201160014.jpg
 
A house lit up like erm well a Christmas tree:-
Tamsp35-7041000px.jpg


Just had to make do at f2 and 1/60 for this shot and neg is under exposed:-
Helios21000px.jpg


Ye olde newspaper shop
Sigma28mm21000px.jpg
 
Last edited:
Liam said:
Love the last one, would look great on large format is it 35mm?
Click to expand...

If the question was to me Liam :wave: it was the sigma 28mm f2.8 mini-wide II on BC1 35mm. Quite a few people are not impressed with this lens, but if the digital guys want try film on the cheap with a WA lens it's quite good.
 
More snowy portra from Bayern..

 
robhooley167 said:
Very nice tones, tempted by portra but I need to try Ektar first colour neg wise. What's the latitude and reciprocity like?
Click to expand...

Lattitude's very tight, Jury's out on reciprocity, some say it doesn't fail, others disagree, It's certainly like no other C41, can be pretty difficult to predict the outcome. When it comes together though the results are pretty epic!
 
Another of my 52 pics, week 3 and playing with lighting LF with small flash guns, yes it can be done.
6716526263_40fb158182_b.jpg
[/url][/IMG]

Mart
 
My first roll of 35mm film in about 10 years. Rollei retro in my Nikon F70.

6709271961_5d6d04e173_z.jpg

Lands End, Cornwall.


6709313377_b04168080f_z.jpg

Beach Steps, Cornwall.
 
robhooley167 said:
Very nice tones, tempted by portra but I need to try Ektar first colour neg wise. What's the latitude and reciprocity like?
Click to expand...

I've got on very well using Ektar for night shots, not tried the same with Portra. Portra is definitely the subtler of the two. I'm still unsure of the differences between Portra and ProH, they're very similar but there are subtle differences. I really need to shoot all three side-by-side on the same scenes for comparison. I need another back.. .
 
6724548359_2ba54b3067_z.jpg

Very overcast day at St Michaels Mount, Cornwall. Shot on my first roll of rollei retro in my recent purchase, Nikon F70.
 
Made a cuddly toy tree for my grand-children for Xmas not sure which shot is better so posted both.

FDn28mm1000px.jpg


24mmSigma51000px.jpg
 
First one is definitely better, the second was taken using a straight-on flash, correct? Yeah, basically never do that ;)
 
Superewza said:
First one is definitely better, the second was taken using a straight-on flash, correct? Yeah, basically never do that ;)
Click to expand...

Indeed natural light is better and should have used a tripod, but there should have been no problem with the direct flash as I was using a T90 with 300TL and this combo should have balanced the ambient light with flash light...erm something went wrong :suspect:
 
I became a dad for the first time last week.

Zeiss Ikon Nettar, HP5+ (iso 400), Rodinal 1+50
20120123131903_scan-120119-0005.jpg
 
Congratulations to you Brian and your other half !

Nice and lovely photo, definitely keep it somewhere for the memories ! :)
 
One from me. Have been working on the processing (both film and then post scanning!) and have got some much better results. Negs were much cleaner having tipped the pot of final rinse with wetting agent down them into a bucket.


HP5+ thru M6 3-16.jpg by menthel, on Flickr
 
erictearle said:
That does look very clean indeed. Nice work.

nice office too
Click to expand...

Thanks, it's actually my Father-in-law's who is in the picture (he is also looking at a picture of my wife and son!). I think it will get cleaner again once I change from Ilfosol 3, although these are the best set of negatives I have had from it yet.
 
Congratulations Brian and good work Jim :thumbs:
 
Thanks all :) You can guess what my week 3 "Sigh" photo for my 52 will include. Though I'll be good and not turn it into a new parent "isn't my offspring the best" thing.

Frankly, I was just interested to see what the lens on the Nettar could do after I stripped it down completely to clean the 50+ years of gunk from it. I think it's a keeper as a folder; that was handheld at 1/25 or so, so the softness is about what I'd expect. Very happy there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top