Show us yer film shots then!

5509871880_cb22b68c1a.jpg


5509883496_f6f5096efa.jpg


Couple from me!

Leica M4P, VC 28mm Ilford HP5+ and developed in ID11.
Second one is using an orange filter.

Cheers
ped
 
Last edited:
Rob_Ashton said:
I've just been having a play with vuescan for the first time... MILES better than standard scanner software! one I never bothered with from the holls:

lakesnet.jpg


Portra 160NC
Click to expand...

Very nice Rob. Have you tried Kodak Portra 400 yet? If yes, then what do you think of it?

Al
 
Cheers guys, now I look at it it does look a little skewed lol

Very nice Rob. Have you tried Kodak Portra 400 yet? If yes, then what do you think of it?
Click to expand...

I've not actually, I do fancy trying a few rolls though, bit expensive but probably worth it. I've just got a load of T-MAX 400 and a load of dev kit to have a go with, I'll post up some first attempts tomorrow once my negs are nice and flat :D
 
I have started using up my Fuji Neopan 400 and am very pleasantly surprised at it performance. Prior to this I had only used the C41 variety and it is a very different animal (the hit and miss Tesco lab processing, at that time, didn't help)

So, Fuji Neopan 400 - in stock D-76

The Dare...

Students being students

5564816938_15888a8a16_b.jpg



Steps Down.

I love the line and curves.
The white mark on the steps is: a white mark on the steps!

5564240471_8df657c521_b.jpg


The Wood Burner.

A newly 'commissioned' wood burner (just being lit) and an appreciative dragon from Kathmandu.


5564240747_a4913c73b1_b.jpg
 
alistair.o said:
I have started using up my Fuji Neopan 400 and am very pleasantly surprised at it performance. Prior to this I had only used the C41 variety and it is a very different animal (the hit and miss Tesco lab processing, at that time, didn't help)

So, Fuji Neopan 400 - in stock D-76
Click to expand...

Nice results and tonality.
 
Couple from my first attempt at home developing, taken on Kodak TMAX 400 developed with Ilfosol 3 1:9 - 6m @ 20C. B+W red/orange filter used on both shots.


Untitled by Rob_Ashton, on Flickr


Untitled by [url=http://www.flickr.co
 
Last edited:
Some shots of the Victoria Government Parliament building on Vancouver Island in the Province of British Columbia, Canada. I really would have liked a color shot of that stained glass. There is something like over 3000 light bulbs are installed on the exterior.




SMC Pentax 105mm f2.4, Kodak 320TXP, PMK Pyro



SMC Pentax 55mm f4, Kodak 320TXP, PMK Pyro

​
 
Great stuff Tuco, and it would be nice in colour.

For me I've been trying out my latest purchase Minolta X-300 with:-

Vivitar 28mm f2, Reala, Asda dev and scanned, I've just adjusted the brightness down (always the same i.e. too bright)
CNV00002-800px.jpg

and
Minolta 50mm f1.7... really sharp lens
min50mmf17800px.jpg
 
One more off the roll, quite like this tmax, interested to see how it compares to the roll of Delta 400 I've got in camera now. this again taken with B+W red/orange filter.


Untitled by Rob_Ashton, on Flickr
 
The Fremont Troll. This is a concrete sculpture some people constructed under a bridge. I finally caved at took a token shot of this thing. To get an idea of scale, that is a real Volkswagen Bug clutched in the troll's hand.




Zeiss Distagon CF T* FLE 50mm f4, 100 Acros, PMK Pyro

​
 
Last edited:
Pentax 67 with Fuji Neopan 400. 1 hour developemnt in Rodinal

5556597707_1d63236974_z.jpg



5556597163_6b734b84a8_z.jpg



5553894275_8e6ec1c398_z.jpg
 
AlanSmithee said:
The Fremont Troll. This is a concrete sculpture some people constructed under a bridge. I finally caved at took a token shot of this thing. To get an idea of scale, that is a real Volkswagen Bug clutched in the troll's hand.
Click to expand...


And Amazingly, that's still not the biggest Troll We've had in Film and Conventional :lol:
 
I got the first roll of film from back from the Olympus Trip. After my meter tweaking it seems to be exposing nicely. And the lens is definitely sharp! Fuji Superia 400, exposure either 1/40 or 1/200 and f2.8+!!

Bridges in Bristol
20110328163500_cnv00013.jpg


Nice dynamic range!
20110328163456_cnv00010.jpg
 
Last edited:
Knikki said:
Pentax 67 with Fuji Neopan 400. 1 hour developemnt in Rodinal
Click to expand...

Good results from that stand development. I've had to go to a semi-stand with more agitation because I'd get random, uneven development with the one-hour stand on 120 roll and 4x5 sheet. Your 120 results nice and even.
 
Rob_Ashton said:
One more off the roll, quite like this tmax, interested to see how it compares to the roll of Delta 400 I've got in camera now. this again taken with B+W red/orange filter.


Untitled by Rob_Ashton, on Flickr
Click to expand...

This and the second picture above are atypical of Tmax i.e. very nice IMO. Good effort.

As for the first picture Rob, I feel that the background takes alot away from the subject and for some reason I would have thought that picture to be something like Agfa APX or Rollei 100 not Tmax??
 
AlanSmithee said:




SMC Pentax 55mm f4, Kodak 320TXP, PMK Pyro

​
Click to expand...

Thanks for the kinds words Tuco.

Now, how can anyone stay upright on such a highly polished floor? Don't they have enough of slipping and skating outside for several months of the year! :D
 
AlanSmithee said:
Good results from that stand development. I've had to go to a semi-stand with more agitation because I'd get random, uneven development with the one-hour stand on 120 roll and 4x5 sheet. Your 120 results nice and even.
Click to expand...

Thanks it was the first time I had tried it. One of the negs I did get slightly uneven development but over all happy with the results. As for the agitation it was swirling it around (like you do with a fine brandy/cognac) for first 30 seconds or so then leave for an hour.


alistair.o said:
Oh my oh my! Now your talking real developed tonality and smoothness.

Well done!
Click to expand...

Thanks
 
Really like those images Ped :thumbs:
 
@ Alistair.o

As for the first picture Rob, I feel that the background takes alot away from the subject and for some reason I would have thought that picture to be something like Agfa APX or Rollei 100 not Tmax??
Click to expand...

You will have to excuse me for not knowing what Agfa APX or Rollei 100 look like, I'm new to this game lol - but those shots are all off the same roll, could be something to do with horrible indoor lighting, I certainly cant explain it :D
 
MindofMel said:
annoyed that the sea blew out but learning how this camera meters. from my 2nd roll of film ever:

Brighton - Nikon F301, Expired '02 TMAX 400 BW, 50mm f1.8 AFD

5569094968_34406f2195_z.jpg
Click to expand...

I quite like how it came out actually, gives it an almost 'foggy' effect :)
 
***annoyed that the sea blew out but learning how this camera meters. from my 2nd roll of film ever:***

We all have made exposure mistakes, the camera meter was probably reading the bright white clouds reflected in the sea...next time take a reading of something grey and set the camera to that reading manually or use the exposure lock lever.
 
Rob_Ashton said:
I quite like how it came out actually, gives it an almost 'foggy' effect :)
Click to expand...

Yep - sort of a "sea fret" kind of vibe going on ;)

I reckon that the shot, and the other couple in another post, are actually more washed out than blown, i.e. there were different colours in the sky and sea, but they rendered as the same tone in B&W. In these cases, a yellow/orange filter can often keep enough contrast to make things work.
 

Some rocks



Zeiss Planar CF T* 80mm f2.8, NDX400 + O2 Orange Filter, 100 Acros, PMK Pyro, 30 Second Exp

​
 
Please excuse all the lint and bits on the picture. I (foolishly) bought some cotton gloves so as to 'better' handle the negatives! I could cry because of the amount of time taken to try to get rid of the cotton bits

Anyway, Using a Nikon 35mm F2 Ais on an FM2n - Nottingham. UK.

Sax and Patch



5574060408_67641b93ed_b.jpg
 
Rollei Retro 100, these are scans from prints an Kentmere VC Lustre:

Merc%20side%20small.jpg


Merc%20interior%20small.jpg


Shame about the reflection on the screen (I've called it Caspar:lol:)
Merc%20front%20small.jpg


Merc%20light%20small.jpg
 
A 26mm lens would have been better ;)

28mm f2.8 Vivitar close focus:-
viv28mmCFver2-800px.jpg


and this shot needed a 22mm lens ;)

Sigma 24mm f2.8
sigma24mm1800px.jpg
 
Nesster (Jussi) a friend of mine, was kind enough to send me 4 rolls of Ferrania. 2 rolls of 100 and 2 rolls of 400. Thank you kindly 8-)

Of course, I chose the worst part of the day to shoot. high noon harsh sun light, but I was anxious to get out. I managed to shoot 1 roll of each using two bodies. It was very tough to do in the span of an hour...Anyway...It felt good to shoot analog again.

Canon AE-1, FD28F/2.8, Ferrania 100
CanonAE-1FD28FerraniaSolaris10026.jpg


CanonAE-1FD28FerraniaSolaris100.jpg


CanonAE-1FD28FerraniaSolaris1002.jpg


CanonAE-1FD28FerraniaSolaris1007.jpg


Blurry, but I like the pic
CanonAE-1FD28FerraniaSolaris1006.jpg


Blending in
CanonAE-1FD28FerraniaSolaris1009.jpg
 
...............the place looks deserted for midday, surely it can't be that hot in March/April to keep people indoors.
 
alistair.o said:
Please excuse all the lint and bits on the picture. I (foolishly) bought some cotton gloves so as to 'better' handle the negatives! I could cry because of the amount of time taken to try to get rid of the cotton bits

Anyway, Using a Nikon 35mm F2 Ais on an FM2n - Nottingham. UK.

Sax and Patch



5574060408_67641b93ed_b.jpg
Click to expand...

REALLY like this picture Alistair, great capture :) :thumbs:
 
jgredline said:
Nesster (Jussi) a friend of mine, was kind enough to send me 4 rolls of Ferrania. 2 rolls of 100 and 2 rolls of 400. Thank you kindly 8-)

Blending in
CanonAE-1FD28FerraniaSolaris1009.jpg
Click to expand...

I wish my street ratio was as good as 1 in 6 JG..:)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top