Do we charge high as it is our work... or realise that we can churn them out as it is "only a print" :shrug:
Janice, I charge reasonably but I have to charge higher than the £50 suggested by EG.
I produce my own prints (A4,A3 and A2) to a high archival standard and in limited-editions. I liase closely with my framer.
The break-down would be as follows:
Income £50 (for A4)
less Outgoings:
VAT £7.50
Gallery commission £22
Framing £18
Printing costs £x
------------------
Profit... er what profit?
Oh yes, then less the Tax Man's share
Do you see the problem?
I regularly visit St Ives, the arty place in Cornwall and am constantly disgusted by the lack of quality or artistic ability in some of the original paintings for sale. Obviously churned out in 15 mins and not cheap!
(Rant starts here...)
Photography does not receive the same respect as a collectable
ARTform in UK as it does in USA or Europe - this mainly due to togs not respecting it as such. This needs to change,
we need to change
our attitude - only then will public and art-buyers attitudes change!
If your images are good enough to sell - great! But if you do sell 'em you become a professional; being a pro tog does not stop at taking a great image - it begins there! Think professionally,
BE professional, produce a professional product and charge a (reasonable but) professional price!
(Rant over!)