This is excellent advice and particularly advisable for items of jewellery that is often very difficult to describe.
Andy
Thanks, but acutally my idea wasn't for "difficult to describe" items (although you are welcome to use close up for this purpose), it was to combat
easy to describe items.
Anyone can Google for photos of say a Nikon or a Canon and look at the pictures carefully, remember every lines, every shape, then if they steal my own Nikon, and if they're stopped, they can hope to describe the item easily (from memory), even if they didn't have the camera for a long time, to make it sounds like it is theirs.
The trick is to have your own photos showing any damage marks on your items or any customised items. (Say if this model was released with a triangle eye-ring for the camera strap, but you chose to change to say D-ring) any photos of the model downloaded from Google would show it in its standard look and factory fresh, but your photos would show the camera as it looks now. The idea is for the police to match the stolen camera to your photos and know it is yours.
The officer (or insurance person) would say something like: "Hang on! Major Eazy's photos do show that chipped corner and that worn out rubber grip, plus his photos shows the camera with white lettering, same as the camera we have here, whereabouts you failed to mention the damaged parts 'your' camera picked up over the years, plus your photo looks too new and got sliver lettering. Did you by any chance download that picture off Google?"
Somewhat similar to those movies where a person in an attempt to prove he(or she) do know the other person, would describe the birthmark or tatto that is not seen easily by others.
But yes, close up photos can be useful for hard to describe parts of your item.