Saturday was interesting

[Shorn]

Sounds like you sorted out a good few questions there Pete.
No's 4,5,11,18,21,26,38,43,44 are my faves. But 61 is far the best for me. Does the model real justice.

 

[SimonTALM]

This is the full set in case I've missed a few photos that people may think are good, but that I didn't.

Pete,

Thanks for the link to all your shots, I was flicking through and I think you do your self down, there are some really great shots . OK in some I don't think the poses quite work. But I have to say my abolute favorite is #47 - the eyes only shot. There is something so sexy about that image which beats IMO all the others (including the T&A shots).

 

[InaGlo]

Aww! wish Id made the effort to travel now, sounds right up my street!

Looking forward to seeing you develop your style working with models... if anyone can use natural light to great effect ... you can!

 

[Susane]

This is the full set in case I've missed a few photos that people may think are good, but that I didn't.

The ones that caught my eye that you haven't posted yet;
3670
3675
3681
3683
3700
3702
3770
3776
3793
The ones that I'm particularly drawn to;
3568
3705
3706
And a couple of candids that I like;
3589
3591

 

[petemc]

Pete,

Thanks for the link to all your shots, I was flicking through and I think you do your self down, there are some really great shots . OK in some I don't think the poses quite work. But I have to say my abolute favorite is #47 - the eyes only shot. There is something so sexy about that image which beats IMO all the others (including the T&A shots).

I totally agree. She had the perfect look for the effect I wanted. As soon as I saw her, bam! I knew exactly what I wanted. I think the image could be improved with a longer focal length at a distance, just because I was right up in her face.

The ones that caught my eye that you haven't posted yet;
3670
3675
3681
3683
3700
3702
3770
3776
3793
The ones that I'm particularly drawn to;
3568
3705
3706
And a couple of candids that I like;
3589
3591

So one or two then

 

[J Gordon]

60 of 63 for me Pete. Lovely catch lights, good tonal range and love the slightly noncholant expression and the fact her hair is not immaculate. Cant see the attraction meself....

 

[RobbieW]

have looked through the post and can't see the answer to this, but if its there sorry for re-asking... what was your lighting setup for these photos? were you using studio lights? natuarla lighting or a flash gun?

 

[petemc]

Some were studio lights, some were natural light outside. I prefer natural light, no flash, by so much.

 

[RobbieW]

Thye did look natural which if you can manage it is always a plus, did you use a light meter to gauge it? or was it pot luck / skill?

 

[petemc]

The outdoor shots were just me guessing things. No light meter. Camera does a good enough job, from what I've seen

 

[RobbieW]

in that case good work,