Sometimes it works, sometimes not.
Apparently it's the new "in" thing to dislike.
C'est la vie.
Why is it that when the majority of people see running water, they have to take a photo with a long exposure?
Remember when selective colour was a thing? [emoji6]
Maybe people like doing it, so who are we to say what someone should or shouldnt do with their photography? People like long exposures...so what. How does it actually affect anyone else on here in a negative way. I dont think the people that do it are trying to pass it off as something new, so whats the problem?
Hi Nick. Nobody has said it is good or bad. Or it affects anyone in a negative way. And nobody said it was a problem. A question was asked and some people replied in a calm manner.
You obviously stubbed your toe on the table leg just before replying to this thread. I hope it gets better soon, and you reply in a much better mood next time.
Thank you for your effort.
I'd say why not?Why is it that when the majority of people see running water, they have to take a photo with a long exposure?
Not my thing, personally, I prefer to capture water sharp and crisp, but if people like it, then why not? I sometimes see someone using some technique or effect and think I'd like to have a go at that, so give it a try (with varying degrees of success!). Currently thinking of giving focus stacking a go, for example, so I suspect that's the way of it with fluffy water shots ... they're produced by people who've "seen it done, so thought I'd try it". That is, after all, how we learn and expand our skills, and find out what we like and don't like (and, of course, how retailers of filters, software, gadgets, tripods and related photographic ephemera, make a living .....!!) Each to their own.
Why is it that when the majority of people see running water, they have to take a photo with a long exposure?