mercedes
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,235
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Great work and very nice shots. Is this the same shot that is on the commemorative plate that's advertised?
joescrivens said:well thats pretty stupid of them, nothing to do with appreciating your gear or not but arriving in the place you need to be with gear that works as needed to. Not putting on a cap or filter during a travel runs the risk of arriving somewhere with a huge scratch or tons of dust and getting a load of carp photos.
In terms of the operation you ran, I take it that is was exceptional in the grand scale of things?
I think you might be over estimating how much effect dust and scratches on a lens will affect a photo. About all it will do is reduce the resale value.
joescrivens said:i think you might be underestimating it. a great big smudge across the front element could ruin that vital shot at the moment they need to grab the camera, it takes less time to pull of a cap than it does to clean the front element
In terms of size, it was quite a small event. Our biggest event so far has been the Olympics in Beijing. 33 venues, hundreds of photo positions, all linked back to a central office for nearly 60 people. Plus the Olympics runs for 2.5 weeks whereas the Royal Wedding was a few hours.
In terms of importance, it is probably the most important event since the World Cup Final in 2010.
In terms of size, it was quite a small event. Our biggest event so far has been the Olympics in Beijing. 33 venues, hundreds of photo positions, all linked back to a central office for nearly 60 people. Plus the Olympics runs for 2.5 weeks whereas the Royal Wedding was a few hours.
In terms of importance, it is probably the most important event since the World Cup Final in 2010.
After seeing a thread on here about a year ago there is a reportage about shooting with a lens with a completely smashed front element. Still completely useable images! I'm sure not putting a cap or two stopped pros making a buck they'ld be putting the caps on.
So are all "your" photographers freelance or actually employed by Getty?
Wow, an amazing insight!
I just assumed that it was all done wirelessly these days, I never imagined that you run cables to photographers, that in itself must be quite a task. I take it that there are tunnels under the Mall for cabling etc (which would have been troublesome as regards security etc.), and that you didn't just dig it up.
After seeing a thread on here about a year ago there is a reportage about shooting with a lens with a completely smashed front element. Still completely useable images! I'm sure not putting a cap or two stopped pros making a buck they'ld be putting the caps on.
Joe, can you knock it off please?
This is an interesting thread that deserves to not get trashed by squabbles.
Gerard, Have you recovered from cabling fatigue yet?![]()

I have no idea! Could you point me in the direction of the plate?
I doubt it is the same photo.
DemiLion said:Joe, can you knock it off please?
This is an interesting thread that deserves to not get trashed by squabbles.
Gerard, Have you recovered from cabling fatigue yet?![]()
Keebsuk said:Wow way to not read a post Demi. Sigh
Sorry for the late reply, been away. Trawled through the weekly papers and here it is! I'm sure there were a zillion other cams there, but it's either yours . . . or someone sat on your shoulder.
http://www.danburymint.co.uk/index...._id=&mediacode=D8595&kiks_code=&showproduct=N