Roman Polanski ?

Trappe

Trappe

Suspended / Banned
Messages
3,701
Name
Rory
Edit My Images
Yes
If he were not so famous would the same luvvies be defending the fact that he had underage sex ?.......Let's face it, I have yet to hear the term P****** used.
 
Last edited:
I agree he seems to be getting the sympathy vote big time!
 
Trappe said:
I have yet to hear the term Paedophile used.
Click to expand...

The Sun used that term.

Would you use that term for yourself if you'd had sex when both you and your partner were underage? Or reserve it for adults with a sexual interest in prepubescent children?
 
I agree he certainly is not being given the same treatment you or I would. However I don't know all the ins and outs of the case, but I do know the girl he had sex with does not want to bring charges. I'm not convinced that putting him in prison now would be of any benefit to society.
 
Face it, he admitted the charge then fled the country when he found out he'd have to do time. Call it what you will, he should be sent back to the states to receive the punishment that's deemed appropriate.
 
photon said:
The Sun used that term.

Would you use that term for yourself if you'd had sex when both you and your partner were underage? Or reserve it for adults with a sexual interest in prepubescent children?
Click to expand...

I decided not to use the term in the original post then i edited it as the term P was a bit vague. She was 13 and he was a 30 something....!!

I knew this was going to rattle a few feathers but what really gets my goat up are all the luvvies including some politicians that are standing by him. yes he is a genius at what he does and I admire his work but it has been reported that he allegedly "plied the aspiring model with sedative drugs and champagne during a hot tub photoshoot at the Hollywood home of Jack Nicholson.":thumbsdown:


HMMMMMMM
 
Last edited:
photon said:
The Sun used that term.

Would you use that term for yourself if you'd had sex when both you and your partner were underage? Or reserve it for adults with a sexual interest in prepubescent children?
Click to expand...

He was 44, she was 13, so I'm not sure of the point being made here.

I don't know about the US but here there is no legal definition of a paedophile. However the legislation does see 13 as one of the breakpoints.

I can't see how anybody of a European background could see a 44 year old having sex with a 13 year old as anything other than wrong.
 
I can't see how anybody of a European background could see a 44 year old having sex with a 13 year old as anything other than wrong.
Click to expand...

I doubt any of his supporters are saying what he did was right. I assume they're saying what benefit to society would be achieved by extraditing him to the U.S. and then imprisoning him?

I could see the money that brining this case would cost being spent on doing something more worthwhile, and sort out the chav scum making peoples lives a misery in the UK.
 
treeman said:
I doubt any of his supporters are saying what he did was right. I assume they're saying what benefit to society would be achieved by extraditing him to the U.S. and then imprisoning him?
Click to expand...

That's a question you could ask about a lot of people who have fled to escape prosecution. However isn't it right that society deals with those who run and not just those who stay to face up to their responsibilities?

treeman said:
I could see the money that brining this case would cost being spent on doing something more worthwhile, and sort out the chav scum making peoples lives a misery in the UK.
Click to expand...

It isn't an either or, both should be done, but within the law.
 
treeman said:
I could see the money that brining this case would cost being spent on doing something more worthwhile, and sort out the chav scum making peoples lives a misery in the UK.
Click to expand...

Why would the US be giving money to the UK? This case has nothing to do with the UK.:shrug:


Castrate the dirty old git, it's what all sex offenders deserve.
 
treeman said:
I agree he certainly is not being given the same treatment you or I would. However I don't know all the ins and outs of the case, but I do know the girl he had sex with does not want to bring charges. I'm not convinced that putting him in prison now would be of any benefit to society.
Click to expand...
(My italics)

Surely the case has been tried so it's no longer a matter of her wanting the case to be dropped. He skipped out before sentencing, having plea bargainned the offence down from rape using drink and drugs to the lesser charge or underage sex. While (like all internet information) the Smoking Gun website cannot be regarded as the truth, whole truth etc, there's some of the victim's testimony there and plenty of other reading matter can be found using Google (or the search engine of your choice).
 
Personally what I find bizarre is all of the poeple that are standing by him, at the end of the day, regardless how long ago it was, he had sex with a child, plyed her with drink and drugs, then I guess raped her. If that was any normal member of the public, out on the street, and people knew about this, we would be lynched, beaten up, driven out of town. And, how has he been able to ply his trade for all these years, with people knowing what he did. Crazy, utterly crazy!!!!
 
-spb- said:
Personally what I find bizarre is all of the poeple that are standing by him, at the end of the day, regardless how long ago it was, he had sex with a child, plyed her with drink and drugs, then I guess raped her. If that was any normal member of the public, out on the street, and people knew about this, we would be lynched, beaten up, driven out of town. And, how has he been able to ply his trade for all these years, with people knowing what he did. Crazy, utterly crazy!!!!
Click to expand...

Two nights ago I heard some gink on the box saying he should be released because how incredibly talented and artistic he is.
I don't get how anyone could think in such a perverse way.
 
Not wanting to start a new thread on the same subject and not wanting to hijack this one, my extended thoughts being.
He’s no better than Gary Glitter and yes he should be brought to book, what he did was obscene and he broke the law of the state he was in at the time, and he should pay the price for his actions.
However what if it had happened elsewhere, somewhere were it wasn’t illegal, could it then be justifiable with such an age difference, should the law dictate on age difference as well as the age of consent.
Many countries have different ages of consent, Canada 14, Hungary 14, India 18, Tunisia 20, The Vatican state 12.
The age of consent in the UK was raised to 16 from 13 in 1885 to help prevent child prostitution. The madams in the brothels supplying ever younger girls as virgins in response to their client’s attempts to avoid STDs.
I had my first sexual encounter at 14, I at that time wasn’t even aware that it was against the law, I’m now 62.
Thoughts?
 
It is not an issue of the age of consent, the girl in question did not consent

He raped a 13 year old girl 3 times, one time being anally, he has committed a heinous criminal act and should be punished.

He is nothing more than a low life pedophile scum bag
 
Agree with Keith
 
Keith W said:
It is not an issue of the age of consent, the girl in question did not consent

He raped a 13 year old girl 3 times, one time being anally, he has committed a heinous criminal act and should be punished.

He is nothing more than a low life pedophile scum bag
Click to expand...

I never knew that detail until now. That is horrific. He should have been locked up for life for that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top