Roman 'documents' found in London dig

Box Brownie

Suspended / Banned
Messages
17,645
Edit My Images
No
I heard a news bulletin that the oldest and biggest find of Roman documents had been unearthed in London and that the oldest was dated 57AD

Now likely just me but the standard of reporting does throw too many howlers...............I do not doubt the item dated from 57AD but dated 57AD ! To state/report it that way is just plain daft :(

PS oops! missed the 'n' off the end of London :exit:
 
Last edited:
I heard a news bulletin that the oldest and biggest find of Roman documents had been unearthed in London and that the oldest was dated 57AD

Now likely just me but the standard of reporting does throw too many howlers...............I do not doubt the item dated from 57AD but dated 57AD ! To state/report it that way is just plain daft :(

PS oops! missed the 'n' off the end of London :exit:


Could have been a typo (they can happen all too easily!!! ;)) missing out the "to" after the "dated" or the newsreader may have dropped it. Then again, I would have thought tha these days they would have said CE rather than AD.
 
The beeb reports it correctly

This tablet was found in a layer dated by MOLA to AD 43-53

You should read a better news service :D
 
The beeb reports it correctly

This tablet was found in a layer dated by MOLA to AD 43-53

You should read a better news service :D

Ah! well it was a BBC radio 2 news bulletin so the news reader should be given a better script ;)
 
I would have been a lot more concerned if the documents were dated 57 BC :D
 
That's nothing, we have a president whose birth certificate lists the hospital he was born at as the name the hospital took several years after his birth, now that's forethought!
 
That's nothing, we have a president whose birth certificate lists the hospital he was born at as the name the hospital took several years after his birth, now that's forethought!

Birther alert.
Tinfoil hat time.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top