Yes, it seems daft, but while idiots use things like this as a joke on a plane after they've had 2 sherberts and found that altitude makes the effects much more pronounced, it's suddenly not as funny.
Doesn't happen? yes, it does. I've been to 3 or 4 requests for police when people decided to be 'amusing' during the flight.
In reality, the article should have made it clear, its not 'confiscated' it simply has to go in the hold. But that wouldn't make for a good story would it.
There's nothing new in this at all, in fact having it go in the hold is a good alternative, as conviction carries a hefty sentence.
My last Ch. Superintendent at Heathrow insisted that everyone caught under the Aviation Security Act was charged, no matter what, so he's lucky.
For those interested. the legislation is very clear:
S4 (2) Aviation Security Act
(2)This section applies to the following articles, that is to say—
(a)any firearm, or any article having the appearance of being a firearm, whether capable of being discharged or not;
(b)any explosive, any article manufactured or adapted (whether in the form of a bomb, grenade or otherwise) so as to have the appearance of being an explosive, whether it is capable of producing a practical effect by explosion or not, or any article marked or labelled so as to indicate that it is or contains an explosive; and
(c)any article (not falling within either of the preceding paragraphs) made or adapted for use for causing injury to or incapacitating a person or for destroying or damaging property, or intended by the person having it with him for such use, whether by him or by any other person.