AndyWest
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 8,400
- Name
- Andy
- Edit My Images
- No
Mine was a Kodak DC260, in the mid/late 90s, bought in the United States on my behalf, for £500. They cost £800 over here at the time! Still got it too.
I saw one sold on eBay recently.. for 8 quid
![]()
I do, because I just found it in the garage, and the batteries were still working!
Cant remember the last time I used it, but I bought it in around 1997/8 at a cost of around £250. A massive expense for a 1/3 rd of a megapixel output and no flash. You could swivel the lens though and photograph yourself, if you were that way inclined. It even has a macro setting
Memory was a massive 96 pages ( images) and internal only but the quality wasnt brilliant. At the time, it was cutting edge technology and I remember the excitement when we had a Japanese student staying with us using the first digital camera I had ever seen.
Its amazing whats available now, just 14 years on with full frame sensors and more knobs dials and buttons than you can shake a stick at.
Here it is in all its glory....
![]()
![]()
Still working perfectly as well.
Allan
Kodak DC40 1995. Still got it!
KODAK DIGITAL SCIENCE DC40 Camera
SpecificationsType CCD still frame camera
Image size 756 x 504 high resolution
Bit depth 24-bit color
Speed With flashpictures can be taken every 8 seconds
Without flashpictures can be taken every 5 seconds
Operating environment Temperature: 0 to 40ºC (32 to 104ºF)
Humidity: 20 to 95 percent, noncondensing
Power sources Batteries: 4 AA batterieslithium, NiCad, or alkaline (3.6 V DC - 5.4 V DC)
Power Adapter: 4.5 V DC/1.75 A to 8.0 V DC/1.0 A (surge protected)
Power consumption Standby: <500 mW
Operating: <4.5 W
Dimensions Approximately 6.1 x 5.3 x 2.2 in. (155 x 135 x 55 mm)
Weight Approximately 1 lb (0.5 kg)
Some of these cameras produce pretty good results! I think we should start a thread of images from old digi cams.
Some of these cameras produce pretty good results! I think we should start a thread of images from old digi cams.
It's the father of the NEX 3 & 5!!I had a Sony video camera with a 1 Megapixel still camera built in. I was told by the man in the shop that it was ideal for both video and stills and quickly got used to the simplicity of digital photos. My stupidity meant that I didn't realise how much worse than the cheap Pentax 35mm film camera it was I hav every few decent pics of my first son between 2000 and 2003 when I got the Sony DSC-717great camera
![]()
.This thread would be so much better if everyone in cluded shots taken with their original canera. I'm probaby too young to be taking part in this thread anyway
.