<div class="bbWrapper">I’m rubbish too<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><br />
<br />
I did have a bit of a head start, about 60 years ago the firm I worked for shot weddings on 16mm, I have no idea how much they charged but I do remember that the film cost alone was about £400, over £7K today, and that was per camera, and sometimes we shot with 2 of them. At that cost, we had to do a really good job.<br />
<br />
My boss was great, he taught me to measure twice and cut once, which I’ve stuck to in my professional still photography life, so although the technology has changed beyond measure, the principles still hold true<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /><br />
<br />
The only trouble with my boss is that he had a serious drink problem, and we were at weddings . . . – so I had to learn quickly.<br />
<br />
A few years ago my youngest son, who is a highly-skilled agricultural mechanic, started a project, which was going to make him rich on YouTube, completely overhauling specialised machinery, starting with an old drott that hadn’t run for years. We started off with a single iPhone, ended up with 5, and I learned a lot, and especially about editing, from that.<br />
<br />
The biggest single problem (for me) was lack of continuity, weeks or months would pass between shooting days, and the weather, his overalls, hair length, background and everything else would change with it.<br />
<br />
Sadly (or not, depending on viewpoint and priorities) he then became too busy to continue, but I live in hope that we may go back to it one day</div>