The Masked Unit
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 15
- Edit My Images
- No
Hello all,
I recently managed to find a Nikon D600 for £839 (in John Lewis of all places - Exeter branch if anyone's interested) and as the D600/610 is something I've been lusting after for a while, thought it too good an offer to ignore. I'm in the process of selling my Canon 600d and assorted lenses and will ultimately have about £600 to spend on used FX lenses, and although I'm settled on getting the 70-300mm and a 50mm 1.8, I'd appreciate some advice on what to get at the wider angle end of the scale, as I'm primarily interested in landscapes and would like something as sharp as my budget allows. The three main options available as I see it in my price range are the 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR, the 20-35mm f/2.8D, and the 24mm f/2.8D.
Going for the prime and losing the focal range of the zooms wouldn't bother me at all if it's noticeably sharper, and I don't really see a lack of VR as a problem as if I'm shooting something that wide, I'm generally on a tripod. Having something that goes down to 20mm would be great but I'd prioritise sharpness over that. I'm also not bothered about the two f/2.8 lenses having better low light capability, because I'll have the 50mm 1.8 to cover that.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!
I recently managed to find a Nikon D600 for £839 (in John Lewis of all places - Exeter branch if anyone's interested) and as the D600/610 is something I've been lusting after for a while, thought it too good an offer to ignore. I'm in the process of selling my Canon 600d and assorted lenses and will ultimately have about £600 to spend on used FX lenses, and although I'm settled on getting the 70-300mm and a 50mm 1.8, I'd appreciate some advice on what to get at the wider angle end of the scale, as I'm primarily interested in landscapes and would like something as sharp as my budget allows. The three main options available as I see it in my price range are the 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5G ED VR, the 20-35mm f/2.8D, and the 24mm f/2.8D.
Going for the prime and losing the focal range of the zooms wouldn't bother me at all if it's noticeably sharper, and I don't really see a lack of VR as a problem as if I'm shooting something that wide, I'm generally on a tripod. Having something that goes down to 20mm would be great but I'd prioritise sharpness over that. I'm also not bothered about the two f/2.8 lenses having better low light capability, because I'll have the 50mm 1.8 to cover that.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated!