Phil V
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 26,303
- Name
- Phil
- Edit My Images
- No
Turning up as a guest with a camera?I understand entirely what you're getting at Phil, as does the OP I'm sure. But turning up as a guest with a camera does not translate to being "the wedding photographer". Especially if expectations are managed and the happy couple understand you are just a guest with a camera.. Like all the others with mobile phones.
If people are that precious about the photo's, a pro will be hired.
As a guest, the photos I capture inevitably become less graceful through the day as the booze takes hold. This adds to the ambience, but probably not the quality. I've still only ever had positive feedback and overwhelming appreciation for making that bit of extra effort for the special day.
That's not the same as 'I've agreed to shoot 3 weddings next year '.
This isn't semantics, people saying one thing then pretending that they meant something else.
If you're 'taking bookings', whether you charge £0, £200 or £2000 you are 'the wedding photographer' and if you mess up you become a newspaper headline. From memory this has included several students charging little or nothing and at least one Facebook advertiser charging nowt whilst portfolio building.
I keep repeating, there's no 'vested interest' here; I have advised and helped dozens of photographers, this is the collective experience of lots of people advising planning and caution. Not 'don't do it' but 'make sure you've got plans and backups', how people can take offence at the advice to have a backup is beyond me, but I suppose it's all about a pig headed 'I refuse to be told what to do'. Baffling!
