Tony101
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 391
- Edit My Images
- No
I'm going to be buying a new Retina MacBook Pro and I'm trying to balance various specifications; ie. useful working life Vs value for money.
The spec I was looking at is the...
I'd rather not spend any more money, but if it means a machine that may have an extra year of useful working life (during which it's noticeably faster); then it may possibly be a worthwhile investment.
FWIW the 13" has some advantages over the 15" - smaller, lighter, faster SSD, slightly better battery life, slightly faster memory. I edit on an external monitor so the 15" screen real estate isn't a huge bonus.
It will be replacing a lowest spec mid-2010 13" 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo upgraded with SSD and 8GB memory. This has been a trooper but is showing its age, most noticeably chugging with LR and 22MP raw files. No video editing so far, but there may be in the future.
My current MBP has suffered a hardware fault and I don't think it's worth spending any money to repair it, so a replacement is urgently required (no waiting to see what upcoming announcements Apple may make eg. Skylake(?) chips).
Phew! That's probably w-a-y too much info. Thank you for reading all the way down to here.
So would it be £240 very well spent, or should I stick to my original plan of getting an up-to-date direct replacement?
Cheers!
PS: I'm fully aware of the pros and cons of Mac Vs PC, this part of the spec is not up for debate - many thanks.
The spec I was looking at is the...
13", 256GB, with memory upgraded to 16GB - this has the standard 2.7GHz Dual-core Intel Core i5 processor [current gen chip - Broadwell(?)].
However, if I bite the bullet and spend another £240 I could get...15", 256GB, standard 16GB memory - this means the standard 2.2GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7 processor [previous gen chip - Haswell(?)].
I'd rather not spend any more money, but if it means a machine that may have an extra year of useful working life (during which it's noticeably faster); then it may possibly be a worthwhile investment.
FWIW the 13" has some advantages over the 15" - smaller, lighter, faster SSD, slightly better battery life, slightly faster memory. I edit on an external monitor so the 15" screen real estate isn't a huge bonus.
It will be replacing a lowest spec mid-2010 13" 2.4 GHz Core 2 Duo upgraded with SSD and 8GB memory. This has been a trooper but is showing its age, most noticeably chugging with LR and 22MP raw files. No video editing so far, but there may be in the future.
My current MBP has suffered a hardware fault and I don't think it's worth spending any money to repair it, so a replacement is urgently required (no waiting to see what upcoming announcements Apple may make eg. Skylake(?) chips).
Phew! That's probably w-a-y too much info. Thank you for reading all the way down to here.
So would it be £240 very well spent, or should I stick to my original plan of getting an up-to-date direct replacement?
Cheers!
PS: I'm fully aware of the pros and cons of Mac Vs PC, this part of the spec is not up for debate - many thanks.