Printing big? Film or digital?

i was more struck on the catsuit but amazed the digital came out better
 
I would expect a different result at ISO200 but I'm prepared to be proved wrong! Also, wouldn't the digital equivalent of the F5 be the D3?

A couple of other points - how was the film shot digitised? What PP was done on both shots? How was the upsizing done?
 
The film image is only going to be as good as the scan of it, also if they'd taken the shot on slide film and projected it to the same size i think there would have been a clear winner.

I might add I'm not knocking digital, i wouldn't go back to film if you paid me.(but if you paid for the film and processing that's another matter):lol:
 
Yes, as a scientific evaluation of image quality, it's pretty unsound. They basically compared a D300 image against a scanner.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top