R rick07 Suspended / Banned Messages 20 Name richard murray Edit My Images No 10 Sep 2009 #1 which is better all in one or separate
Nod Tootles Suspended / Banned Messages 49,339 Name Nod (UK) Edit My Images Yes 10 Sep 2009 #2 IMO, separate. That way, if one part fails you don't need to replace the whole thing. The downside is the extra space separates take up. [ponder]Where can I fit an A3 flatbed???[/ponder]
IMO, separate. That way, if one part fails you don't need to replace the whole thing. The downside is the extra space separates take up. [ponder]Where can I fit an A3 flatbed???[/ponder]
K kilsbm Suspended / Banned Messages 170 Name Matt Edit My Images No 10 Sep 2009 #3 If you want a top notch photo printer you are probably looking seperate anyway, vs something combined....
If you want a top notch photo printer you are probably looking seperate anyway, vs something combined....
S stew1982 Suspended / Banned Messages 623 Edit My Images Yes 10 Sep 2009 #4 all-in-one is the way to go! (unless you want A3)
OP R rick07 Suspended / Banned Messages 20 Name richard murray Edit My Images No 11 Sep 2009 #5 Thanks for all your replies .I want to scan old prints that i have lost the negatives to will do more research
Thanks for all your replies .I want to scan old prints that i have lost the negatives to will do more research
DizMatt Suspended / Banned Messages 3,751 Name urrrm.... Matt Edit My Images Yes 11 Sep 2009 #6 with a neg scanner in mind a separate one would be handy I think epson do decent neg scanners in the hood iirc
with a neg scanner in mind a separate one would be handy I think epson do decent neg scanners in the hood iirc
