Well, people slate HP printers.
Lexmark seem to be better (IMO) at laser/office printers
That leaves Epson. Whilst people do rate them as good as Canons, some people report issues with print heads clogging.
Personally I didn't buy an Epson last time, as my last Epson rusted.
My last three printers have been Canon because of that, the latest being the Canon Pro 9500 Mk II, which is A3+. It is a good printer, the only downside is that it takes 10 cartidges, and so a full cartridge set isn't cheap. There is no CISS for it apparently the Canon's don't lend themselves to CIS.
Epsons do seem to have CIS available, so IF my canon does fail (which I see no reason for in the next
Never done the measurements lol. Was never a fan of canon printers, personally never had luck with them, any others that anyone can recommend?
Have you tried their Pro range? This would be like saying that I had Canon compact and therefore I don't want 1DX.
Pro 1 and Pro 10 are based on pigments, therefore the prints are more durable and some sources suggest - somewhat water proof. The downside is high cost per page. Note Pro100 is dye based which means you want to keep prints away from any moisture. http://www.redrivercatalog.com/infocenter/articles/canon-pro-100-vs-canon-pro-10-compared.html
The alternatives - Epson 3880 and R3000 - both pretty old but can also deliver results.
However if you fancy more - look at Canon ips6400 (bargains on ebay?!)
The Pro 9500 Mk II is pigment based. One day I was taking a picture from the car, and it got splashed with some wet mud. I blew it off when I was inside, no discernable mark left on the image.Pro 1 and Pro 10 are based on pigments, therefore the prints are more durable and some sources suggest - somewhat water proof.
The Pro 9500 Mk II is pigment based. One day I was taking a picture from the car, and it got splashed with some wet mud. I blew it off when I was inside, no discernable mark left on the image.