Printer advice

wicksey

Suspended / Banned
Messages
16
Name
stuart
Edit My Images
Yes
hi

I am branching out as a freelance photographer in December. although in intend to get most of my prints done professionally, i want to invest in a good home printer.
i have looked at the reviews of the following:

[*]Canon ix 6550
[*]Canon PIXMA Pro9500 Mark II
[*]Canon PIXMA Pro9500

Some advice will be welcomed around my dilemma.

waiting in anticipation :)

Wicksey
 
I can't comment on the two you've mentioned but I'm very happy with my Epson Stylus Photo 3000.
 
NPhoto magazine just did a comparison test of several A4 and A3+ printers. they tested these:
Canon Pixma MG6250 - best value A4 printer
Canon Pixma Pro9000 Mk2
Canon Pixma Pro-1 - best in test
Epson Stylus Photo PX830FWD
Epson Stylus Photo R2000
Epson Stylus Photo R3000 - 2nd place
HP Photosmart 7510e - best all-in-one
Kodak esp32 - don't even go there!

Comparing the Pixma Pro-1 and R3000 (which used to be the de-facto champion) they found the colour and mono performance to be marginally better with the Canon.

Hope that helps :)
 
you'll not get any 3rd party carts or CIS with the pro-1

fotospeed do refillable carts for the R3000
 
If you intend to print for sale, you should consider a calibration system that calibrates both your monitor and your printer. To go the whole hog you can calibrate the images taken on import into Lightroom with a Colorchecker passport.
 
canon for me
I find epson unreliable, always have. i'd only ever consider the top end epsons
and by design, the use ink everytime you turn them on which I detest.
canon all the way for me
 
the ix6550 is great but its dye. If you plan on going selling prints you really need to use a pigment printer. I would personally look at the Pixma Pro-1 and R3000 too. I bought a r3000 from fotospeed with there own inks. They will will make custom profiles for you with your chosen ink and media.
 
Unless you're already an expert (which judging by the question you're not) I'd forget home printing as a professional. Maintaining a pro quality workflow on a home printer requires the full suite of calibration tools and custom printer profiles if you stray away from standard inks and media.

Professional quality printing is now cheaper than ever - and better than all but the most dedicated home printing operator - there are people who do home printing that produce stunning results. Although you might find a printer that prints DVD's a useful tool - if you plan to deliver any digital files to customers.
 
All my photo printers are Canons - an s820 (A4) (now retired in favour of), an iX4000 (A3) and a Selphy 710 (postcard, dyesub). My wife has an Epson R220 (IIRC), but gets me to do anything important. Doesn't mean my choices were right but I looked at test prints from both Canons and Epsons and prefered the Canon results for accuracy and overall quality. If you can, get a shop to run you off a couple of test prints using the same source files and see which you prefer.

I have once used a compatible cartridge rather than genuine - NEVER AGAIN! poor colour rendition, terrible longevity of colour and the risk of nozzle blockage made me pull it out and replace it with a genuine Canon one ASAP. Yes, Canon carts are more expensive than 3rd party ones BUT, if you have to throw away a compatible cart after just a few prints, that's money wasted anyway, ignoring the genuine ink then used to flush the **** ink out of the system! I know some people swear by compatible carts - I just swore at the one I used.
 
Back
Top