King of Groove
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 6,956
- Name
- King
- Edit My Images
- Yes
In the March 2008 issue of Practical Photography there is a rant on the letters page about how water is shown in photography magazines. I reproduce it.
"I think I shall go mad and scream and stop buying photographic magazines altogether if I see another photograph showing water as a frozen, featureless slab of white nothing, as it is so often portrayed today. In all my long working, and photographic, life, I have never, never, never seen water looking like it is portrayed today. Water has life, depth, light and shade, it has form, and it has texture. Where are these in today's uncritical, slavishly copied, modern images? Are there no thinking photographers left? It's becoming a total bore."
The highlighting is his not mine.
So folks is the person right or wrong?
"I think I shall go mad and scream and stop buying photographic magazines altogether if I see another photograph showing water as a frozen, featureless slab of white nothing, as it is so often portrayed today. In all my long working, and photographic, life, I have never, never, never seen water looking like it is portrayed today. Water has life, depth, light and shade, it has form, and it has texture. Where are these in today's uncritical, slavishly copied, modern images? Are there no thinking photographers left? It's becoming a total bore."
The highlighting is his not mine.
So folks is the person right or wrong?