Quite likely. We have employed people with degrees in electronics who didn't know the most basic of things so I don't see why it shouldn't be possible with other subjects.
Steve.
Gr8Shot said:
I don't think that you've read the thread that Mark is referring to. The answer is most definitely Yes.
Is it possible that you could pass a degree in photography and not understand some of the basic technicalities like apertures and shutters speeds and their effect on the final image?
Just curious![]()
I don't think that you've read the thread that Mark is referring to. The answer is most definitely Yes.
Highly unlikely, but not impossible. At some point you will just not be able to create work to a high enough standard if you do not have the technical ability.
[edit]
You may pass... but a pass degree is worthless.. you won't be getting honours... not on my watch anyway.
I didn't even comment on that thread so how do you know I was..........Oh
Right, so a pass is possible, and you'd be perfectly entitled to say you have a degree.
The problem is these days its all math and no practical work, so they arrive knowing furrier series calculations but not knowing which setting to test current on with a fluke.
Not an honours degree,...
So if you have a BA Hons in Photography, you should be able to understand why you're pictures of moving people aren't sharp?
Degrees are academic... if you feel that's somehow wrong, then degrees are not for you... go and do a HND or a FdA which are far more vocational.
So if you have a BA Hons in Photography, you should be able to understand why you're pictures of moving people aren't sharp?
But aren't those considered lesser qualifications?
We're intrigued now. What's the reason for your question?
Steve.
I don't want to point fingers as it seems a little harsh, but in another thread someone was asking why their pictures of moving people were not sharp, and their website says they have a BA Hons in Photography.