People like this **** me off

The defence of Fresh Politics here has attacked Scott on the grounds that he asked someone to remove an image he had taken of them.

They then went on to speak about David Tennant or something. These are two completely different issues. Basically, you with David Tennant was taken as a personal memento with the permission of both parties. Whereas the picture of the unnamed person who Scott spoke to was taken on an editorial basis, when he was covering an event.

At the end of a day, Fresh Politics have broken the law. Using illegal images is grossly wrong, photographers work for a living and if their images are being used without permission they are losing out for someone else's "gain".
 
nathanadam said:
The defence of Fresh Politics here has attacked Scott on the grounds that he asked someone to remove an image he had taken of them.

They then went on to speak about David Tennant or something. These are two completely different issues. Basically, you with David Tennant was taken as a personal memento with the permission of both parties. Whereas the picture of the unnamed person who Scott spoke to was taken on an editorial basis, when he was covering an event.

At the end of a day, Fresh Politics have broken the law. Using illegal images is grossly wrong, photographers work for a living and if their images are being used without permission they are losing out for someone else's "gain".
Click to expand...

Welcome to the forum :p
 
im not boasting but im 16 and take business studies and media studies so you wont have a leg to stand on when it comes to me!

one of my mates decided to copy a review off IMDB for media studies coursework, he of course got in trouble for plagarism now you are doing exactly the same, are you not?
 
nathanadam said:
The defence of Fresh Politics here has attacked Scott on the grounds that he asked someone to remove an image he had taken of them.

They then went on to speak about David Tennant or something. These are two completely different issues. Basically, you with David Tennant was taken as a personal memento with the permission of both parties. Whereas the picture of the unnamed person who Scott spoke to was taken on an editorial basis, when he was covering an event.

At the end of a day, Fresh Politics have broken the law. Using illegal images is grossly wrong, photographers work for a living and if their images are being used without permission they are losing out for someone else's "gain".
Click to expand...

Nice summary of the thread. Although please read it, progress has been made and no harm has been caused.
 
nathanadam said:
People still seem to despise the fact that you have been using images that were not yours to use.
Click to expand...

And have been removed because of the advice of the not-arrogant posters in this thread. Now stop speaking for everyone.
 
Fresh Politics said:
And have been removed because of the advice of the not-arrogant posters in this thread. Now stop speaking for everyone.
Click to expand...

I am not being arrogant at all. I am displaying facts which the majority of this thread have backed up.
 
OK kids. Points have been made FP has cleaned his site, time for bed now.

Sorry that sounds too patronising........lets just put this thread to bed.
 
Guys, you all know each other apparently, so if you want to squabble, please do it in private ;) :D

The OP was in the wrong. He now knows that. He's now taking action to get himself in the right. No more digs required :)
 
chris321 said:
Guys, you all know each other apparently, so if you want to squabble, please do it in private ;) :D

The OP was in the wrong. He now knows that. He's now taking action to get himself in the right. No more digs required :)
Click to expand...

I don't know the person in question.
 
nathanadam said:
I don't know the person in question.
Click to expand...

No, but you are:

nathanadam said:
the photo editor of NND Scotland, a photo and news agency ran by myself and Scott Campbell (scottcampbell)
Click to expand...

I appreciate you have an interest in this, but please try and keep in constructive. And you don't want it to look like you've just signed up here to get involved in this matter, do you ;) :)

Not sure there really is much more to add to this thread now?

Chris
 
NigelPaul said:
OK kids. Points have been made FP has cleaned his site, time for bed now.

Sorry that sounds too patronising........lets just put this thread to bed.
Click to expand...

chris321 said:
Guys, you all know each other apparently, so if you want to squabble, please do it in private ;) :D

The OP was in the wrong. He now knows that. He's now taking action to get himself in the right. No more digs required :)
Click to expand...

:plusone: This is starting to sound all too like 2nd period history class. Im sure the OP has learned a thing or two and has hopefully taken it on board.
 
chris321 said:
No, but you are:



I appreciate you have an interest in this, but please try and keep in constructive. And you don't want it to look like you've just signed up here to get involved in this matter, do you ;) :)

Not sure there really is much more to add to this thread now?

Chris
Click to expand...

I know Scott, but he is not the person or persons in question. I do not know the person behind Fresh Politics, like I said. :)

This thread does not need to go any further and this is just prolonging it.
 
chris321 said:
No, but you are:



I appreciate you have an interest in this, but please try and keep in constructive. And you don't want it to look like you've just signed up here to get involved in this matter, do you ;) :)

Not sure there really is much more to add to this thread now?

Chris
Click to expand...

And seeing as you have looked up my page, you will have noticed I have been a member since before this thread started.

Anyway, I agree that this matter should now be laid to rest.
 
yeah...whatever happened to journalistic impartiality...lol
 
So.. back to the original post. Sorry found this thread and it's taken me a while to read it, especially after reading the pidgeon post.

Anyways... Has the invoice been sent to FP yet?

P.s. Vote Labour ;)



or Lib Dems..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top